Post reply

Welcome to AntiPolygraph.org Message Board.
Log in
Sign up

May 13, 2026, 05:48 PM

AntiPolygraph.org Message Board
► Polygraph and CVSA Forums
► Share Your Polygraph or CVSA Experience
► Post reply ( Re: What the agency actually sees. )

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:: Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Name
Email
Subject
Message icon

[quote author=Dustin link=msg=3392 date=1024913511]
Well, so I thought I was really a liar the first time I took this test, but after reading some of the posts, I realized I'm not alone. With this thinking, I called back the agency I failed with and asked them to tell me exactly what questions I supposedly "lied" on. After hearing the questions and which ones I reacted to, I finally asked the Sgt. what exactly he was looking at. I pressured him to ask if he was seeing a chart produced by the machine, some types of graphs, or anything. He said no. I asked if he heard the audio tape that was running during the test and had picked something up from that. He said no. So finally, after pressuring him, I asked what exactly he did have. So he said the only thing that he recieves is a written summary from the poly examiner telling him what I lied on and giving a reccommendation that I was untruthful. This I thought was total bull sh*t, seeing as he never was shown any hard evidence that I had lied. Maybe the examiner didn't like me, and I had been totally honest and passed, but what she writes down is what is the key to my getting the job. So, it really does go back to the examiner holding all the cards. You fail, but they can still say you passed. You pass, and they can still screw you over. Anyone else had this happen?
[/quote]

Attachments: (Clear attachments)

Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB

Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached

Click or drag files here to attach them.

Insert width (px):

Insert height (px):

(Clear attachments)

Other options

Return to this topic
Don't use smileys

Verification:

Please leave this box empty:

Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:

How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):

Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Dustin

- Jun 24, 2002, 06:11 AM

Well, so I thought I was really a liar the first time I took this test, but after reading some of the posts, I realized I'm not alone. With this thinking, I called back the agency I failed with and asked them to tell me exactly what questions I supposedly "lied" on. After hearing the questions and which ones I reacted to, I finally asked the Sgt. what exactly he was looking at. I pressured him to ask if he was seeing a chart produced by the machine, some types of graphs, or anything. He said no. I asked if he heard the audio tape that was running during the test and had picked something up from that. He said no. So finally, after pressuring him, I asked what exactly he did have. So he said the only thing that he recieves is a written summary from the poly examiner telling him what I lied on and giving a reccommendation that I was untruthful. This I thought was total bull sh*t, seeing as he never was shown any hard evidence that I had lied. Maybe the examiner didn't like me, and I had been totally honest and passed, but what she writes down is what is the key to my getting the job. So, it really does go back to the examiner holding all the cards. You fail, but they can still say you passed. You pass, and they can still screw you over. Anyone else had this happen?