- Welcome to AntiPolygraph.org Message Board.
A forum for free and open discussion of polygraph-related topics
Posted by TALON
- Dec 12, 2002, 12:47 AMdon't worry about nerves. they are your particular baseline. employ countermeasures on control questions, laugh on inside at silly little machine. 
Posted by TALON
- Dec 12, 2002, 12:46 AMdon't worry about nerves. they are your particular baseline. employ countermeasures on control questions, laugh on inside at silly little machine.
Posted by TALON
- Dec 12, 2002, 12:39 AMdon't worry about nerves. they are your baseline, activate countermeasures above that line on control questions. laugh inside at silly little machine....
Quote from: not me again on May 09, 2002, 12:59 AM
A highschool diploma
Also I wrote those personnel people a letter. (I told them to carefully review my results and asked them to see if I failed to answer what is my true name also- cus i was a bit intimidated and I felt I chewed up in every question) To be honest I didnt expect to get polyied but I did everything in 3 days phys and all. They gave me another poly i really didnt ask for it. But that is what they decided to do and I decided to take their offer. The part where I got DQ was something I never did I swear.
My problem is I get nervous alot. I may not show it but I get nervous. What can I do. Hopefully knowledge is POWER.
Posted by Seeker
- Oct 30, 2002, 04:42 AMyes, little george...you do love the game...for to you, it is nothing more than that...a game.
By the way...are all of these spankings that you are getting turning you on? You sure do come back for more of it!
By the way...are all of these spankings that you are getting turning you on? You sure do come back for more of it!
Posted by Skeptic
- Oct 30, 2002, 03:25 AMQuote from: george on Oct 30, 2002, 03:05 AM
I guess I'm not as brilliant as all the PHDs who have signed the on-line petition.
I guess in order to be that intelligent you have to be in the cult or should I say one of maschke's malcontents.
I do love this game.
george,
You don't have to be as brilliant as anyone else. It would be nice, though, if you could make an attempt at engaging in honest debate regarding the polygraph.
Skeptic
Posted by george
- Oct 30, 2002, 03:05 AMI guess I'm not as brilliant as all the PHDs who have signed the on-line petition.
I guess in order to be that intelligent you have to be in the cult or should I say one of maschke's malcontents.
I do love this game.
I guess in order to be that intelligent you have to be in the cult or should I say one of maschke's malcontents.
I do love this game.
Posted by Skeptic
- Oct 30, 2002, 03:01 AMQuote from: Seeker on Oct 29, 2002, 11:05 PM
Polyman:
That is patently untrue!
The polygraph is biased against the truthful, and the NAS report supports this.
Of course it is, and Polyman knows it. You won't hear one word about the evidence of the polygraph's accuracy from these flacks. Their function is to mislead, not argue honestly.
These are just desperation propaganda tactics by a group of worried polygraphers.
Take it as a compliment. They may have felt they could ignore the end-the-polygraph movement before. We evidently have their attention now.
Skeptic
Posted by Fair Chance
- Oct 30, 2002, 12:59 AMDear little "george,"
Everytime you post, people hold their breath hoping something of substance will be forthcoming, why must you disappoint them so?
Everytime you post, people hold their breath hoping something of substance will be forthcoming, why must you disappoint them so?
Posted by george
- Oct 30, 2002, 12:37 AMFour days after my first post the Maschke cult is still at it.
You malcontents really have nothing to do.
Pretty good for a fifth grader. Don't ya think.
You malcontents really have nothing to do.
Pretty good for a fifth grader. Don't ya think.
Posted by Fair Chance
- Oct 30, 2002, 12:28 AMDear Seeker,
Do not be alarmed by Polyman2002's prattle. He has impressed me that he can put more then three sentences in one post. I am suspicous that he had help (from his twin brother little "george"). Please be happy that everytime he is reading your postings that you are helping him with his reading skills. If you look at his discourses on other threads, he is still having problems comprehending "the book." His special flare for inflammatory remarks is almost at the high school level. Please keep posting and maybe you will help him get to college.
When he presents us with serious discussion, we will then take him seriously.
Do not be alarmed by Polyman2002's prattle. He has impressed me that he can put more then three sentences in one post. I am suspicous that he had help (from his twin brother little "george"). Please be happy that everytime he is reading your postings that you are helping him with his reading skills. If you look at his discourses on other threads, he is still having problems comprehending "the book." His special flare for inflammatory remarks is almost at the high school level. Please keep posting and maybe you will help him get to college.
When he presents us with serious discussion, we will then take him seriously.
Posted by Seeker
- Oct 29, 2002, 11:05 PMPolyman:
That is patently untrue!
The polygraph is biased against the truthful, and the NAS report supports this.
While I can totally understand fears of future employment by the polygraphers, I am sure the Good Old Boy Network will find you suitable work elsewhere. Misinformation will do nothing to secure your livelihood.
With all due respect, until a scientifically accurate test can be developed, which the NAS says it has no evidence of such a possibility, such junk science does nothing but make absolute comical fools out of the proponents of this trickery.
Ms. Cleo has been exposed for her fraud, as will this fraud.
That is patently untrue!
The polygraph is biased against the truthful, and the NAS report supports this.
While I can totally understand fears of future employment by the polygraphers, I am sure the Good Old Boy Network will find you suitable work elsewhere. Misinformation will do nothing to secure your livelihood.
With all due respect, until a scientifically accurate test can be developed, which the NAS says it has no evidence of such a possibility, such junk science does nothing but make absolute comical fools out of the proponents of this trickery.
Ms. Cleo has been exposed for her fraud, as will this fraud.
Posted by Polyman2002
- Oct 29, 2002, 10:44 PMI can answer that question for you. Don't too many people pass the polygraph using counter measures. However, I can assure you that everyone pass the polygraph when being truthful. Your future, career, and destiny is in your own hands ladies and gentlemen. Just tell the truth.
Posted by Seeker
- Oct 25, 2002, 07:54 AMHow is it that it is totally acceptable to use review materials and to even be coached to pass tests such as the ASVAB, SAT, MCAT, LSAT, and many other life-determining tests, but some of you consider ANY assistance with the polygraph to be so patently immoral?
The polygraph doesn't come near to perfection in its results as even one of these above mentioned tests. Yet, every year there are thousands of seminars that help prospects hone their test taking skills, and looking at my class ads right now in the local paper, there are 18 ads for coaches to help folks pass these various tests. I find it utterly foolish to submit to any test without preparation.
When the test is flawed, as is the case with the polygraph, there should be an even more vigilant attempt to prepare oneself for such a test. To not do so, is merely stupid.
The polygraph doesn't come near to perfection in its results as even one of these above mentioned tests. Yet, every year there are thousands of seminars that help prospects hone their test taking skills, and looking at my class ads right now in the local paper, there are 18 ads for coaches to help folks pass these various tests. I find it utterly foolish to submit to any test without preparation.
When the test is flawed, as is the case with the polygraph, there should be an even more vigilant attempt to prepare oneself for such a test. To not do so, is merely stupid.
Posted by beech trees
- Oct 10, 2002, 03:17 AMQuote from: Watcher on Oct 09, 2002, 11:52 PM
It is amazing that you will actually be a law enforcement officer. LAPD must be hard up.
Yes, say hello to your polygraphing BI friends in the Los Angeles Police Department's Rampart Division. Their hard work really helped weed out the bad apples.
Posted by watcher
- Oct 09, 2002, 11:52 PMQuote from: Not Not MEEE on May 09, 2002, 12:54 AMIt is amazing that you will actually be a law enforcement officer. LAPD must be hard up.
Actually when I applied for the LAPD I thought nothing of it really and I did not complete the application until I was at the testing facility. Some of the administrtators complained that it was incomplete and other parts of the app were unreadable. Oh well.
I took a test passed that, I got an interview psch eval piss test phys and background invest and I paased it all. I manage to irritate my background investigator since I couldnt remember all the loations I lived atr since I moved alot.
All in all in order to make it to the LAPD you just need to complete those processes. Just complete not needed to do well. Im reading about the sting and im gonna read georges pdf file too.
It is shocking how little you need to know or be qualified to be a cop. All u need is a diploma, be healthy and pass the poly-SERIOUSLY