Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by pailryder
 - Mar 25, 2008, 07:20 AM
Mr Cullen

An excellent question and the first post that I think I could answer but choose to decline.

Countermeasures hold the possibility of success, but successful employment by an amature against pros, is a long, long shot.
Posted by T.M. Cullen
 - Mar 24, 2008, 09:48 PM
This was the format used way back when I had my test at the NSA.

They used a Relevant Control Test format in which there were 4 relevant test questions, each also serving as a control.  Assuming they were testing to see if a test subject reacted more to one relevant question than to the other three, how could one use countermeasures?

The relevant questions were on "unauth foreign contact", "disclosure of classified info", "membership in subversive organizations", and "Do you plan to answer all questions truthfully".

BTW, I didn't pucker.

TC