Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Ludovico
 - Sep 29, 2007, 02:10 PM
Someone email that pup a tin-foil hat. Quick.
Posted by 1904
 - Sep 28, 2007, 10:15 AM
Quote from: Red_Rider on Sep 25, 2007, 10:46 AMSorry Gents, I mis posted this yesterday. I have a question about these layered voice systems.  If there are old secret telephone recordings made without your knowledge or consent, and there was personal information about child pornography, pedophilia, kick-backs, hidden income, and other embarrassing information, could this be used against me in a court of law?  Can they really use this layered voice technology to verify it is my voice and I was involved in these activities?  My wife knows a lot of attorneys and I would be in big trouble if this is the case.  I know they can do this by analyzing computers, but can they also do it with voice recordings?  Any advice would be helpful.  It seems that paradiddle doesn't think these devices are very good, but the other guys seem to make a pretty persuasive case that they work.  I would think that if the U.S. military uses them they must be pretty good.  I hope you other gents are right and they don't work.

What I find to be even more intriguing is how any attorney would consort with stupid people.
The mind boggles.
Posted by Red_Rider
 - Sep 25, 2007, 10:46 AM
Sorry Gents, I mis posted this yesterday. I have a question about these layered voice systems.  If there are old secret telephone recordings made without your knowledge or consent, and there was personal information about child pornography, pedophilia, kick-backs, hidden income, and other embarrassing information, could this be used against me in a court of law?  Can they really use this layered voice technology to verify it is my voice and I was involved in these activities?  My wife knows a lot of attorneys and I would be in big trouble if this is the case.  I know they can do this by analyzing computers, but can they also do it with voice recordings?  Any advice would be helpful.  It seems that paradiddle doesn't think these devices are very good, but the other guys seem to make a pretty persuasive case that they work.  I would think that if the U.S. military uses them they must be pretty good.  I hope you other gents are right and they don't work.