Quote from: 1904 on Jun 19, 2007, 11:22 AMQuote from: JunkMan on Jun 18, 2007, 05:06 PMQuote from: theaman8 on Mar 12, 2007, 04:38 AM
FYI
" The results of the polygraph examination shall not be used as evidence in a hearing to prove that a violation of supervision has occurred." Fla. Stat. Ann. § 947.1405 (10)(b)(1).
Well then, why test such a subject in the first instance..??
(Just for practice?? )
Quote from: JunkMan on Jun 18, 2007, 05:06 PMQuote from: theaman8 on Mar 12, 2007, 04:38 AM
FYI
" The results of the polygraph examination shall not be used as evidence in a hearing to prove that a violation of supervision has occurred." Fla. Stat. Ann. § 947.1405 (10)(b)(1).
Quote from: theaman8 on Mar 12, 2007, 04:38 AMi am just curious
i am a florida sex offender i am 22 and had sex with a 15 year old thinking she was 19...
and i have to take a polygraph test for councsing can this test be used agaisnt me in court or no..
also i have epilepsy can this stop me from talking the test i am on dilantin for the epilepsy
thanks for any help
Quote from: digithead on Mar 12, 2007, 04:27 PMGeorge,
As part of his or her release, the probationer or parolee signs a legal document that stipulates the conditions of supervision. Within the context of post-conviction supervision, the polygraph is stipulated in these conditions as part of the treatment and supervision protocols. The probationer "agrees" that polygraph results can be used as a basis for revocation, regardless if the revocation is by a parole board or judge...
All probationers and parolees should know their conditions of supervision by heart. The epileptic poster should check his own documents as they will state explicitly what he agreed to regarding the polygraph in his release papers...
At best, he can get a lawyer to argue that his epilepsy somehow "taints" the polygraph results but since there is no peer-reviewed research on this matter, the court or parole board likely will not give it much weight...
digithead