Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many states are in the United States? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by flechettes
 - Jul 26, 2006, 09:25 PM
Looks like polygraph exams are a good example of the 1% theory which states if there is a 1% chance of someone being guilty then they are guilty. ( or something like that) Maybe polygram exams have a chance of weeding out 1% of those who indeed are involved with harming national security, and those that are innocent (99%) are discarded because the supply of potential of future employees are unlimited.

When we kill bad guys we kill the innocent also. This is just the price of doing business and the business is national security. It is the shame how the innocent always bear the burdens of those who desire to do evil.