Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the last letter of the word, "America.":
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by yankeedog
 - Jul 19, 2006, 10:58 PM
Yes, they can be! And they are!
Posted by cesium_133
 - Jul 06, 2006, 07:54 AM
I seriously doubt it.  Only New Mexico provides for any use of polys in its courts.  I don't know about stipulations as to the results of such a test, but any test that you and your lawyer had done, or that you did on your own, would be your property.  In the former case, it would be a "work product" covered by the attorney-client privilege.  In the latter, it's a piece of paper or a computer file that you had commissioned and that is inadmissible against you in court...
Posted by lost-009
 - Jun 06, 2006, 04:35 PM
Does anyone know if polygraph results can be subpoena in NC?  Thanks.