Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color are school buses in the United States?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by J.B. McCloughan
 - May 24, 2006, 02:44 AM
nonombre quite clearly stated, "(not to give anything away)[/u]".

There is very little substance to joeschmoe's post and a 2 year prep time would lend itself to few examination subjects (with pre-employment being my number one suspect).  

Some consider being found truthful on an examination, even though they told the truth, "beating the box".  This can be from past experiences of failed employment efforts.

So, two simple "(not to give anything away)[/u]" questions I have for joeschmoe.

1.  Was it a specific issue or screening examination
     that you participated in?

2.  Did you lie to any of the relevant questions?

As a side note, I believe that Drew Richardson warned not to use this type of medication.  If this was a pre-employment examination, good luck on the drug screening examination.
Posted by EosJupiter
 - May 24, 2006, 02:03 AM
Quote from: nonombre on May 23, 2006, 10:21 PM

Eos,

I skipped out for awhile.  The posts were just getting to insulting and people were attacking on form, not substance.  I am still not sure if I am back for good.  Let's just say I am sticking my toe in the water and hoping some shark doesn't bite it off...:)

Take Care,

Nonombre


Nonombre,

This medium wouldn't be any fun at all if it wasn't for an opposing view ... And where else can we have so much fun verbally sparring .... ALways highly entertaining. So do stay around, right now this website is the only hobby I have.

Regards ...


Posted by nonombre
 - May 23, 2006, 10:21 PM
Quote from: Twoblock on May 22, 2006, 09:51 PMjoeschmoe

nonombre is a polygrapher who thinks he has the deadwood on all CMs. However, he keeps asking questions on how people beats it. Evidently he is still learning and is trying to pick your brain on how you beat it. Then he can turn it on his next unsuspecting subject. Don't answer his questions.

Hey Twoblock,

Please explain to me how someone who tries to "beat" the polygraph can be a "unsuspecting subject?"

Seems to me to be a contradiction of terms.  In any case, I was honestly wondering what he lied about.  And by the way, I am always learning.  Aren't you?

Eos,

I skipped out for awhile.  The posts were just getting to insulting and people were attacking on form, not substance.  I am still not sure if I am back for good.  Let's just say I am sticking my toe in the water and hoping some shark doesn't bite it off...:)

Take Care,

Nonombre

Posted by EosJupiter
 - May 22, 2006, 11:31 PM
Quote from: joeschmoe on May 22, 2006, 06:33 PMAfter 2 years of mental preperation, the anal pucker technique and 100 mg of toprol, I beat the box. Thanks antipolygraph!

joeschmoe,

Congrats, but the bloodpressure med toprol helped you lower the bloodpressure response ? More info needed here ....  :-/  

Nonombre ... long time no hear ... where have you been lurking ??


Regards ...
Posted by Twoblock
 - May 22, 2006, 09:51 PM
joeschmoe

nonombre is a polygrapher who thinks he has the deadwood on all CMs. However, he keeps asking questions on how people beats it. Evidently he is still learning and is trying to pick your brain on how you beat it. Then he can turn it on his next unsuspecting subject. Don't answer his questions.
Posted by nonombre
 - May 22, 2006, 09:32 PM
Quote from: joeschmoe on May 22, 2006, 06:33 PMAfter 2 years of mental preperation, the anal pucker technique and 100 mg of toprol, I beat the box. Thanks antipolygraph!

In general terms(not to give anything away), what relevant question area did you successfully lie to?
Posted by joeschmoe
 - May 22, 2006, 06:33 PM
After 2 years of mental preperation, the anal pucker technique and 100 mg of toprol, I beat the box. Thanks antipolygraph!