Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Type the third word in this sentence: 'The quick brown fox jumps.' (answer in lowercase):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Persil_White
 - Apr 07, 2006, 05:23 PM
The only reason to do so is to set the stage to roll all or some of the CIA into the Department of State in the mother of all intelligence reorganizations.
Posted by Wallerstein
 - Apr 06, 2006, 06:13 PM
The article linked (at pages 31-32) indicates that State is toying with employing polygraphs for employee screening.  However, it makes it seem unlikely because, apparently, a good many people at State were influenced by the 2002 NAS study.

It also references some new technology regarding brain scans that apparently could be used for lie detection...
http://www.afsa.org/fsj/sept05/jones.pdf