Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by pinned
 - Mar 31, 2006, 10:31 PM
IF... IF the footage on that news spot really showed an actual CVSA unit (a laptop), then I sincerely believe that it does less than "novelty" voice-stress lie detectors that are merely sound level meters and blinking lights. The CVSA on the news did less. The voice patterns did not match what was being said, nor any [real, true, physically possible voice waveform], but apparently was just a random predrawn scribblewave "card" appearing on the screen.

And After getting his PhD in biblical psychology, he (the CVSA pusher) sold his soul and many others to the devil.

There is a very famous and powerful cult that uses tester-controlled "lie detectors" for brainwashing. Hint: John Travolta.
a false lie detector + a confession = a lie + a false confession detector

Once there were pocket calculators and you could count on them
to give you the TRUE answer to a Math question.
Now there are computers with worms, bugs, viruses, trojan horses,
porn, hackers, false advertisements, and demons in their brains!
What do you expect?
OF COURSE!!!

http://www.google.com/search?&q=lies&btnG=Search
Posted by JunkMan
 - Mar 31, 2006, 03:04 PM
My question is:
If the polygraph is so scientifically unsound why doesn't Prime Time expose it's invalidity also?

Just as it appears on this forum, countless folks have been wrongfully accused and suffered great lose from polygraphy. Why are they any different than the victims on last nights show that were tormented by a CVSA?

Could it be someone is being paid to Hush Hush?

Hum :-/
Posted by Sleestack
 - Mar 31, 2006, 04:49 AM
I would like to get my hands on a CVSA and play back Charles Humble's interview through it and see if he is being deceptive  ;D
Posted by Mr. Mystery
 - Mar 31, 2006, 01:46 AM
I especially like the helicopter bringing the owner to work.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Mar 30, 2006, 05:57 PM
ABC News. chief investigative correspondent Brian Ross shines the spotlight on Charles Humble and CVSA in an article titled "Innocent Until Proved Guilty?":

https://web.archive.org/web/20060405214557/http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/story?id=1786421&page=1