Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by G Scalabr
 - Feb 13, 2002, 07:49 PM
Mortified,

This is indeed a good idea. It's actually something that crossed my mind a few months ago. At the time, I put the idea toward the back burner because we are not tremendously skilled with CGI scripting and JavaScript. As George said, our priority right now is the second edition of our book.

If you or any of the other message board readers have the requisite skills and would be interested in helping us out with this project, please e-mail us at info@antipolygraph.org.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Feb 13, 2002, 05:06 AM
Thanks for this suggestion; it is a good one, and one we could indeed implement, but I can't say when. Our immediate priority now is completion of the 2nd edition of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.
Posted by Mortified
 - Feb 11, 2002, 07:47 PM
You may want to consider putting some online tests on the site.  There would be a stream of questions and the user is tested on whether they are irrelevent, control or relevent questions.  Then they are scored.  It would provide practice for those going to take a test and will make them more confident.

Obviously, this may be time-consuming, but I think it would really help people.