Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jun 22, 2005, 03:37 AM
Your poll is not likely to garner many respondents. But even if it did, because respondents would be self-selecting, the results would not be statistically meaningful.

You might, however, find it worthwhile reviewing some of the personal statements posted here:

http://antipolygraph.org/statements.shtml
Posted by confusednow
 - Jun 19, 2005, 11:22 PM
I would like folks in a quick poll in order to better understand the polygraph.

If you all can spare the time to answer the following questions when you reply to this post, it will be greatly appreciated.

1. Who conducted your test.
2. What was your test format (directed lie, probable lie or relevant/irrelavent).
3. Were you aware of how polygraph's are conducted before you took the test (did you know about control vs relevant etc)?
4. Did you use countermeasures?
5. Did you lie on control questions (regardless of answer to Question 3)?
6. Did you pass/fail?
7. Were you tricked into making admissions?
8. Did you lie on relevant questions?


Thanks all, I appreciate your time.