Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color are the stars on the U.S. flag?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by anxietyguy
 - May 12, 2005, 04:47 PM
Your clues are worthless,are you informing me that you are a trained investigator too?
Posted by anxietyguy
 - May 11, 2005, 02:44 PM
Sorry darkcobra but where in my post did I say I lied? I simply stated that I knew the polygraph was a fraud. Learn to read. Oh I forgot you only need a GED to perform polygraphs.
Posted by anxietyguy
 - May 11, 2005, 01:03 AM
Well I have taken an passed numerous polygraphs...so as much as I dislike polygraphers I was able to look them in the face with a BS smile on. The key was doing my homework before I went in, and to know that you and your other polygraph buddies are a fraud. The whole time I was sitting there, I was laughing inside because I knew the game he was playing. Won't be long till everyone knows your game and you will be in the unemployment line. Cheers*
Posted by anxietyguy
 - May 10, 2005, 10:09 PM
At least my profession is not based on lies and ruining people's lives. They don't have time to look at all the data, but they can make a ruling on such? Sorry but we don't have time to hear all the facts, YOUR GUILTY. For your sake I hope so, because after all what is a polygrapher qualified to do? Maybe you will be taking my order at the drive through. Try looking in the mirror the next day when the polygraph is exposed,wish I could be there to see the look on your face.
Posted by anxietyguy
 - May 10, 2005, 05:58 PM
Well how bout you polygraph me in front of the Supreme Court and I will prove to you and them that your machine can be beaten? This will in fact prove how ignorant both of you are.

P.S.
Just because they don't question the validity does not mean they have examined all of the research in regards to "polygraphy". Thus enabling them to still be ignorant.
Posted by anxietyguy
 - May 10, 2005, 03:01 AM
I don't think even the Supreme Court has looked at all of the evidence behind polygraph testing. So in my opinion they are still ignorant.
Posted by anxietyguy
 - May 09, 2005, 07:50 PM
Sorry but ignorance is not knowledge dorkcorbra.
Posted by HomeSteader
 - May 09, 2005, 01:29 PM
What is it with the Texas oppressors?

Do they believe they hold the crystal ball and have all the answers
Posted by Mr. Truth
 - May 08, 2005, 12:44 PM
You can only begin to imagine the pleasure of failing one when you were telling the truth. How about 16 hours of community service to "incentive-ize" you to be more truthful?
Posted by HomeSteader
 - May 06, 2005, 04:10 PM
Is it true that Texas can force polygraph's on post convicted persons who are ordered to undergo SOTA treatment?

If so, will/can someone explain that since the US Supreme courts have found them totally unrealiable and without scientific basis how a state force what our highest courts do not allow in court...

Also, if a examiner claims that an exainmee has been deceptive what are the consequenses; even if the examinee does not disclose incriminating statements or denies the results?

GoFigure?