Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Covert_1
 - Dec 13, 2001, 01:28 AM
FYI,

I read the CIA Applicant statements.  Yup, that's right on the mark....ha ha ha ha.  The Poly is secondary to the "intimidation", they try to get you to quit before you start.  They figure that the odds are, if that sort of thing bothers you....you'd quit after a sort while anyways.  So they rattle you as much as they can.  Shake you down and see how you react.

Hell, I got a call back after "I walked out" on the first Poly!  So what does that tell you?  I told them that "I wanted the job....I didn't NEED the job."   Then I unhooked myself from the box (much to the horror of my polygrapher) and walked the 5 miles down Rt 123 to the Admin building.  I wasn't riding in their F**KING Shuttle Bus.   Got in my car and went home.  I got a call from one of the Nurses that day asking "...where are you?"   I told them, "Well, since you called my house....and I'm talking to you....you figure it out."  Then she informed me that I had more medical tests to finish.  I told her, "No I don't."  The Nurse said "Yes you do, Sir."  I guess she didn't get it.  So I told her, "I am no longer seeking employment with your Agency."  and hung up the phone.

Two weeks later, I got a call form the Office Personell Director asking me to "try again"....it was amazing...in and out with a passing grade in 1 hour (vs the 7 hours previously).... funny....my years there were the most fun of my career.  Once you pass the hazing.....your in!

So, was it a Poly test.....or a Psych test?  You be the judge.

Posted by Covert_1
 - Dec 13, 2001, 01:00 AM
 8)  Tell those Page Building Pukes to shove it!!! ha ha ha.... Lord I really miss those boys.....NOT!

Just admit to nothing and that little "distortion" is just there little way to rattle ya.

They ALWAYS find SOMETHING wrong (they always do).  They'd find a distortion interviewing Mother Theresa.  Since Ames, they're as jumpy as a long tailed cat in room full of rockers.  

If you really wanna piss em off.....take a nap when they "... go to the lab to check the charts."  They never do, they go get coffee and chat with the guys behind mirror.  I guarentee if you just lean back in that ol' easy chair and close your eyes with relaxed look on your face....they'll be right back in in less than 2 minutes....and of course....there will be another "distortion."  They really hate it when you take a nap on em.  :D




Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Nov 26, 2001, 03:48 AM
cia2a,

It's impossible to say for sure what's going on, but it seems likely that your polygrapher thought you were deceptive and/or employed countermeasures. In reviewing the polygraph literature, I've found that polygraphers frequently use the term "distortions" rather than "reactions" when speaking of countermeasures. On the other hand, if your polygrapher truly suspected countermeasures, it wouldn't seem to make much sense to limit the accusation of "distortion" to a single question.

You might want to review Chapters 3, 4, & 5 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector before your follow-up polygraph interrogation (remember, it's an interrogation, not a valid test).

In addition, if your polygraph is with the CIA, as your screen name might suggest, the statements of two CIA polygraph victims on the Personal Statements page will be of interest.
Posted by cia2a
 - Nov 25, 2001, 11:38 PM
 ???
I recently took a poly and have to return for a second as the examiner said he was getting "distortion" on a particular question. He also did what your article mentioned about "Whats on your mind when I asked this question and other BS they try to pull.
Wht is this distortion crap another ploy to try to get me to admit to something that never happened?