Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Orion
 - Nov 22, 2001, 03:45 AM
Again thanks for you help... one little addition to your long post regarding controls vs. relevant,
You talk about drinking under the influence as being a control.... I would agree... however, if 'under the influence' is clearly defined in the pretest, it would become relevant.... this goes the same for commiting a crime, unless it is clearly defined what a crime is (afterall, j-walking is a crime and we've all done that), even if the examiner adds in the adverb 'serious' (what exactly constitues a serious crime?) the question remains a control.
Clearly defined questions are always relevant...

However, I am having trouble with distinguishing one thing.
Pretest, you admit to taking some minor office supplies.
Have you ever stolen from an employer.... control
Have you ever stolen more then $50 worth of merchandise/supplies from an employer?.... would I be correct in stating that that is a relative question since it is very specific?  Does the number value really matter?  Or is the whole point, that due to your past admission, you already have some stress/anxiety over the question, and thus it is used as a control?