Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What sport is the Super Bowl associated with?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by bugmenot
 - Nov 27, 2004, 03:59 AM

these people face bigger problems than the poly... :o
Posted by Administrator
 - Oct 17, 2004, 06:34 AM
"the-man" has been banned for violation of AntiPolygraph.org's posting policy.
Posted by G Scalabr
 - Oct 17, 2004, 02:24 AM
Quotethe man: Gino, you and George are obviously suffering from delusions of grandeur.  Get back on your meds.  And anxietyguy, it's your bedtime son.
Resorting to ad hominem attacks when you are getting crushed on the facts? You couldn't possibly be "I Smell BS" registered under another name, could you?

If you can't hang with the big dogs, perhaps you should get back up on the porch, little angry doggie.


Posted by the-man
 - Oct 17, 2004, 01:05 AM
Gino, you and George are obviously suffering from delusions of grandeur.  Get back on your meds.  And anxietyguy, it's your bedtime son.
Posted by anxietyguy
 - Oct 16, 2004, 11:50 PM
Quote from: Gino J. Scalabrini on Oct 16, 2004, 11:07 PM
Is he telling the truth when he says that he knows nothing about polygraphy? Or, is he trying his hardest to keep from laughing as you knowingly lie to him with your "explanations of how things work?" Unfortunately, you will never know...

I know it was hard to contain myself, seeing that the exam went EXACTLY how it was stated in TLBTLD. Actually I laughed all the way home. It doesn't stop there I still get a chuckle when I see polygraphers such as "the-man" post on here. I will continue to do my part in helping expose polygraphy for what it is. Sorry this angers you "little-man".
Posted by G Scalabr
 - Oct 16, 2004, 11:07 PM
QuotePerhaps you and George should take up another "hobby", maybe mud wrestling......  
Wishful thinking. Regrettably for you and the other polygraph examiners who wish we would walk away from what we are doing here, it's not going to happen.

Both George, myself and the others involved with this site would rather spend our time helping others protect themselves from potential damage to their reputations caused by polygraphy. Besides, as I said before, I get a special pleasure out of knowing just how angry I make people like yourself (as almost anyone who has submitted to one of these "tests" knows, polygraphers are not the most docile lot).

Your scam is being exposed. You are powerless to stop it—there is no way that the AntiPolygraph.org genie is going back into the bottle. Every time an applicant walks in, you know very well that you are second-guessing yourself. Is he telling the truth when he says that he knows nothing about polygraphy? Or, is he trying his hardest to keep from laughing as you knowingly lie to him with your "explanations of how things work?" Unfortunately, you will never know...
Posted by nunyun
 - Oct 16, 2004, 10:31 PM
Maybe you should keep your sexual fantasies to yourself, Your kind of marriage is not yet recognized ;).........

PS: as Dimas says "see ya in the discarded post"
Posted by the-man
 - Oct 16, 2004, 10:10 PM
Quote from: Gino J. Scalabrini on Oct 16, 2004, 02:56 AM
George and I don't sit at home 24/7 at the screen in front of this Web site. We both have jobs, families, etc. This is a part-time venture, essentially a hobby.


Perhaps you and George should take up another "hobby", maybe mud wrestling......
 ;D
Posted by G Scalabr
 - Oct 16, 2004, 02:56 AM
QuoteGeorge, since you continue to insert yourself into the conversation between Gino and myself, and since Gino doesn't have the guts to answser withl the truth
Or, perhaps I didn't happen to see your posts within the 6 or so hours that elapsed before you erroneously concluded that I lacked the fortitude to respond to you. Despite what you polygraphers may think, George and I don't sit at home 24/7 at the screen in front of this Web site. We both have jobs, families, etc. This is a part-time venture, essentially a hobby.

The only lack of guts with regard to AntiPolygraph.org is on the part of the multitude of polygraph examiners who visit this site each day. Nearly 1000 days have passed since former FBI Supervisory Special Agent and polygraph examiner Dr. Drew C. Richardson posted his Challenge to the Polygraph Community with respect to the claimed ability to detect countermeasures. Not a single person has stepped up to the mike in nearly three years. Now that's what I call cowardice.
QuoteAnd didn't you write an article prior to that in which you took the completely oppositive side of countermeasures?  Didn't you actually say they didn't work?
No. At no time did I ever write such an article. You are mistaken. As a person who makes a career determining truthfulness vs. deception on the basis of polygraph charts, I'm sure you are used to be wrong whether you know it or not.
QuoteAnd since you didn't dispute the fact that I also called it a purloined pile of shit, I guess we at least agree on that much.
Or, he neglected to dignify your comments with a response.
Quotebut first I want you to study what the word means and see if you can see any sign of it it your work.
  1.  To use and pass off (the ideas or writings of another) as one's own.
  2. To appropriate for use as one's own passages or ideas from (another).
v. intr.
   To put forth as original to oneself the ideas or words of another.
No, we don't see any sign of plagiarism. So, since you are the one advancing this argument, please enlighten us. As George said, Please point out any passage(s) of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector that you honestly believe to be plagiarized, along with the unacknowledged source upon which you believe such to be based. Put up, or shut up.

The Lie Behind the Lie Detector is well-referenced. In the areas where we drew upon the prior work of others, we provided full text citations.

I'm not exactly sure what the definition is for plagiarism is in the diploma mills that a number of luminaries in the polygraph field appear to have gotten their degrees from. In accredited academic institutions, however, mentioning something that others have written before and properly citing a source is the bedrock of all non-fiction writing. It most certainly is not plagiarism.

So once again, back up your baseless claims or go pound sand.
Posted by anxietyguy
 - Oct 15, 2004, 11:46 PM
Quote from: the-man on Oct 15, 2004, 12:42 AMI am sure he is only about 12 years old.  And I am glad to see you are back, I have been missing some adult conversation.  .

That was one of your previous posts if you have forgotten allready which is possible, with your pea-brain capacity that you have presented to all of us here.

Anxiety
Posted by anxietyguy
 - Oct 15, 2004, 11:42 PM


Maybe you should listen to your own advice regarding your posts about George and Gino. Although it is common for polygraphers to become confused with what is deception and what is the truth. Your claims that George is a liar hold as much validity that polygraphy is a [glb]profession.[/glb]
Posted by the-man
 - Oct 15, 2004, 08:31 PM
George, since you continue to insert yourself into the conversation between Gino and myself, and since Gino doesn't have the guts to answser withl the truth,  I will speak to your "formal challenge", whatever the hell that means .....  but first I want you to study what the word means and see if you can see any sign of it it your work.
   1.  To use and pass off (the ideas or writings of another) as one's own.
   2. To appropriate for use as one's own passages or ideas from (another).
v. intr.
    To put forth as original to oneself the ideas or words of another.


And since you didn't dispute the fact that I also called it a purloined pile of shit, I guess we at least agree on that much.
 ::)
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Oct 15, 2004, 04:30 PM
"the-man,"

I have formally challenged you to prove your accusation of plagiarism. Your initial unwillingness to do so suggests that you made up the accusation. Please put up or shut up.

Now you additionally claim that I have been "proven to be a liar." Please explain this allegation. What have I been proven to have lied about? And where is the proof to which you refer?
Posted by the-man
 - Oct 15, 2004, 04:24 PM
GEORGE, LET GINO SPEAK FOR HIMSELF.   ::)
YOU HAVE ALREADY BEEN PROVEN TO BE A LIAR.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Oct 15, 2004, 04:17 PM
"the-man,"

Please point out any passage(s) of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector that you honestly believe to be plagiarized, along with the unacknowledged source upon which you believe such to be based. I predict that you will not be able to point out even one...because there aren't any. But go ahead, prove me wrong, if you think you can. Your failure to do so will be a tacit admission on your part that your accusation was a baseless fabrication.

Your suggestion that Gino Scalabrini authored an article arguing that countermeasures do not work is patently absurd, and shows that you haven't done your homework.

;)