Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George Maschke (Guest)
 - Jan 26, 2001, 09:04 AM
This is a decision that ultimately, only you can make.

Gino Scalabrini and I discuss this "complete honesty" approach and the risks involved at pages 66-68 of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, and while we consider complete honesty to be, in principle, the ethically preferable choice, we do not subscribe to philosopher Immanuel Kant's view of the "moral imperative" to tell the truth in all situations, either.

In what context do you face polygraph "testing?"


Last modification: George Maschke - 01/26/01 at 06:04:35
Posted by Lostchild
 - Jan 25, 2001, 07:50 PM
Should I just tell the polygrapher that I have read about the poly and know how countermeasure work and I do understand the concept behind this polygraph??