- Welcome to AntiPolygraph.org Message Board.
A forum for free and open discussion of polygraph-related topics
Posted by noone
- Aug 29, 2020, 11:30 AMDo you remember the questions you were asked in the test?
Posted by andnowyouknow
- Jan 31, 2017, 09:57 PMPosted by Joe McCarthy
- Jan 31, 2017, 09:16 PMQuote from: poochai on Sep 27, 2003, 12:50 AM9. Identify the sexual activities that you have been involved in over the last 12 months.
10. Describe the sexual activities you have engaged in since you have been in prison.
I have to say, this is one of the better ones I have seen. That being said, these two items above are problematic, as they violate guidelines.
A sexual history test, covers a period of time from the first sexual memory or experience to the conviction of the offense of conviction.
Any period of time after that, is inappropriate for a sexual history. This is actually one of the big problems I have had with PCSOT testing; there is no regulation of PCSOT, specifically.
Posted by xenonman
- Jan 31, 2017, 02:49 AMQuote from: Bennie on Oct 26, 2003, 03:15 PMYes I am interested in receiving that questionaire, as I am developing a website that will include secret recordings of probation officers, polygraph examiners, and sex offense specific treatment therapist. I want to expose all these frauds, and the States that utilize them to strip people of their integrity, liberties, and human rights.
Please send to me that questionaire. Please ensure it is free of viruses, trojans, and other pests.
Better yet, why not put it on a low cost hosted website? If you don't want to do that then please let me know how to receive this questionaire. I will compare it with the one I will eventually have to take, and then upload both onto my website for all to see what people are being put through in the name of public safety, warranted or not.
Be sure to post a link to your website, after you complete it!
Quote from: orolan on Oct 06, 2003, 03:05 PMQuoteAnd they think something is wrong with you?
I agree. Pretty "sick" mind that dreamed up this questionnaire.
Indeed! Sex with dead animals? That's a new one for me! lol
Posted by xenonman
- Jan 31, 2017, 02:35 AMQuoteThanks for posting this poochai!.Quote from: poochai on Sep 24, 2003, 12:34 AMI have just finished typing a Sexual Behavior History Questionnaire used in some counties in my state into word format. Would anyone be interested in reading it? It is about 9 pages in length. I have also just signed up for zip lip email service....do I use this to post with?
Thanks
One point I should make: Your questionnaire includes inquires about nudism/naturism.
Strictly speaking, these activities are not sexual.
Posted by xenonman
- Jan 31, 2017, 02:34 AMQuote from: Bennie on Oct 26, 2003, 03:15 PMYes I am interested in receiving that questionaire, as I am developing a website that will include secret recordings of probation officers, polygraph examiners, and sex offense specific treatment therapist. I want to expose all these frauds, and the States that utilize them to strip people of their integrity, liberties, and human rights.
Please send to me that questionaire. Please ensure it is free of viruses, trojans, and other pests.
Better yet, why not put it on a low cost hosted website? If you don't want to do that then please let me know how to receive this questionaire. I will compare it with the one I will eventually have to take, and then upload both onto my website for all to see what people are being put through in the name of public safety, warranted or not.
Be sure to post a link to your website, after you complete it!
Posted by james batholomew
- Jan 29, 2017, 06:04 PMi am intrested on this question, how do i adapt the complete questionnaire
Posted by clifford lampria
- Feb 19, 2009, 02:14 AMHi cliff, Iwant to have a copy of your report just for keepsaking thnks
Posted by jessica
- Jan 24, 2009, 11:32 AMQuote from: poochai on Sep 24, 2003, 12:34 AMI have just finished typing a Sexual Behavior History Questionnaire used in some counties in my state into word format. Would anyone be interested in reading it? It is about 9 pages in length. I have also just signed up for zip lip email service....do I use this to post with?
Thanks
Posted by Guest
- May 28, 2004, 12:20 AMAlright X that last post it took me a sec to figure out what forum i was in as pertaining to a job. But that stuff is still out of the question no ones business regardless.
Sorry about that
Sorry about that
Posted by Guest
- May 27, 2004, 10:55 PMAlright this questionaire has to be the most messed up thing ever to impose on someones personal life. And to add insult to injury you have to sit there and explain in detail to a polygraph examiner what you were thinking. Does this mean you tell all to someone you dont know and in the end he tells you that you are a sick human being and that you dont get the job? I can see that if you beat someone and raped them or molested a 10 year old but some of this stuff is off the wall. Someone give me some insight here on what is going on, is this to find out if your sexual activity has continued or what? Or is admitting to anything on here just going to get you dq'd from a job period?
Posted by poochai
- Nov 07, 2003, 07:11 PMBennie.....the questionaire is near the top of the string. Feel free to copy and paste it to where ever you would like. I am not sure if this is a standard form or not..but the county I reside in uses it...or at least the ppl providing S. O. classes..... Oh, and by the way, every document they use is marked...."Do Not Reproduce". We should get together and open our own S. O. program...it's gotta be a gold mine......@ $80 / Session...and there are 14 in my group...which meets on a weekly basis, plus individual sessions with the "Counsler" 
Posted by orolan
- Oct 26, 2003, 03:25 PMBennie,
Have you seen sexcriminals.com?
Have you seen sexcriminals.com?
Posted by Bennie
- Oct 26, 2003, 03:15 PMYes I am interested in receiving that questionaire, as I am developing a website that will include secret recordings of probation officers, polygraph examiners, and sex offense specific treatment therapist. I want to expose all these frauds, and the States that utilize them to strip people of their integrity, liberties, and human rights.
Please send to me that questionaire. Please ensure it is free of viruses, trojans, and other pests.
Better yet, why not put it on a low cost hosted website? If you don't want to do that then please let me know how to receive this questionaire. I will compare it with the one I will eventually have to take, and then upload both onto my website for all to see what people are being put through in the name of public safety, warranted or not.
Please send to me that questionaire. Please ensure it is free of viruses, trojans, and other pests.
Better yet, why not put it on a low cost hosted website? If you don't want to do that then please let me know how to receive this questionaire. I will compare it with the one I will eventually have to take, and then upload both onto my website for all to see what people are being put through in the name of public safety, warranted or not.
Posted by Mr. Truth
- Oct 06, 2003, 05:03 PMI agree and disagree. The behaviors are not thought up, rather, they are behaviors exhibited by offenders. Of course, "offenders" doesn't mean just those people who have been caught, but they just happen to be the ones in the spotlight (typically because of criminal conviction bonus that goes along with having to complete one of these surveys in the first place). And that doesn't mean every offender exhibits every behavior, but it does mean every offender is put into a one-size-fits-all category/presumption of deviant behavior until shown/proven/demonstrated otherwise. For example, just because (and I know saying "just" is a treatment no-no because it minimizes, rationalizes, ad nauseum) you were caught doing one thing doesn't mean you have other deviant behaviors.
The history portion is a good process - if you are willing to look at your past and evaluate/examine what you did in the past and how it may relate to your referring offense, plus it gives you a better understanding of yourself, kind of like "what makes me tick?" It's almost like L. Ron Hubbard's book, Dianetics, those commercials you see on TV once in a while ("Why am I so f**ked up?" page 454).
I know, from what I've seen, most people claim one (or a few) victims, but when looking back in retrospect, being armed with knowledge about what is appropriate or not using certain guidelines, people find they did have more than the stated number of victims. Granted, not all of them, or even any of them, were criminal in nature, but you can see where it leads (childhood roughhousing, teenaged agression, fondling as an adult, as an example). That woman you met in a bar, both of you were tipsy from alcohol, went to her place and had sex, she says no several times just before you climax because she's all of a sudden concerned about pregnancy, but you're too far gone to stop, and you continue to date for several months after that, engaging in unprotected sex again - was that rape?
What makes the process suck is the use of the polygraph. Being scored deceptive time and time again about what you've gone over and over in exquisite detail makes you ask why you were trying to drain the swamp in the first place. But other tools, like the plethysmograph, supposedly are accurate enough to show what arouses you. But on the other hand, the story line you have to listen too is pretty lame - I think the pl-graph only catches fairly unintelligent people, or people who really do have a deviant arousal pattern. For the rest, people who acted out for other reasons, sex being the drug of choice, whose interests are fundamentally adult, consensual contact, it is a waste of time and is insulting, not to mention demeaning.
The history portion is a good process - if you are willing to look at your past and evaluate/examine what you did in the past and how it may relate to your referring offense, plus it gives you a better understanding of yourself, kind of like "what makes me tick?" It's almost like L. Ron Hubbard's book, Dianetics, those commercials you see on TV once in a while ("Why am I so f**ked up?" page 454).
I know, from what I've seen, most people claim one (or a few) victims, but when looking back in retrospect, being armed with knowledge about what is appropriate or not using certain guidelines, people find they did have more than the stated number of victims. Granted, not all of them, or even any of them, were criminal in nature, but you can see where it leads (childhood roughhousing, teenaged agression, fondling as an adult, as an example). That woman you met in a bar, both of you were tipsy from alcohol, went to her place and had sex, she says no several times just before you climax because she's all of a sudden concerned about pregnancy, but you're too far gone to stop, and you continue to date for several months after that, engaging in unprotected sex again - was that rape?
What makes the process suck is the use of the polygraph. Being scored deceptive time and time again about what you've gone over and over in exquisite detail makes you ask why you were trying to drain the swamp in the first place. But other tools, like the plethysmograph, supposedly are accurate enough to show what arouses you. But on the other hand, the story line you have to listen too is pretty lame - I think the pl-graph only catches fairly unintelligent people, or people who really do have a deviant arousal pattern. For the rest, people who acted out for other reasons, sex being the drug of choice, whose interests are fundamentally adult, consensual contact, it is a waste of time and is insulting, not to mention demeaning.