Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last name of the first U.S. president?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by wonderer
 - Sep 13, 2003, 02:00 AM
I was wondering...
I am about to take a polygraph test in a few weeks.  However, I left out a minor confession on my application about my drug history....

I said in my BI application that I have never used any drugs.  But in fact at the age of 14 I used marijuana only once (over 12 years ago); which of course isn't a big deal.   (According to the department's requirements, using marijuana experimentally less than 15 times, more than 5 years ago is not disqualifying. )
 
Why did I not state my 1 time drug use?  I worried, maybe unnecessarily, that because my application is for a federal agency--In the future when I compete to move to an agency with a stricter drug policy: I may automatically be DQed for my 1 time use as a minor.   I probably shouldn't have hid the fact but it's too late to change now.

Anyway, know I have not done anything else that can even be minutely construed and "wrong".  But since getting the notice to appear for my polygraph, I have been getting anxious, reexamining my life history over and over and over again.  And this issue for all stupid and not so stupid reasons is just circling my head.

I want to ask any of you experts including the polygraphist, honestly, would showing up to my test and stating in my pretest that I did use pot once DQ me because it differs from my Background Investigation application?  I have nothing else to hide.

I ask including the polygraphist because I feel if they have confidence in their profession, then my honesty is something that they would appreciate, not tear up.  Or would my revelations just be taken as supposed "deception"?

I would understand how career polygraphist would hate counter measures but I have read the book TLBTLD.   Like most people who have nothing to hide, I want to be honest on my test.   But would I, if  I confessed to something that isn't normally grounds for disqualification (like smoking pot once 14 years ago instead of 0 times like I said), because of inconsistencies setting myself up for a disaster?  

If it were, I might as well continue my denial and even use CMs if necessary.  

-wonderer