Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by lincoln
 - Sep 13, 2003, 01:29 AM
Twoblock,  great point!  Great post!
Posted by Twoblock
 - Sep 12, 2003, 01:29 AM
The article by Lisa Abraham posted in Polygraph News was interesting. Maybe a start in polygraphing politicians.

I sent her the following e-mail:

Dear Ms. Abraham:

I read your article with a great deal of interest because I am a part of a movement to force all politicains and their appointed officials, including judgeships, to pass a polygraph before they can take office or retain their incumbancy. If these officials truly believe the polygraph is such a valuable truthfinding machine, they would be happy to take a polygraph in order to eliminate corruption in government. OR WOULD THEY?

For a supporting opinion go to www.antipolygraph.org click on Reading Room and scroll down to "Open Letter to All Politicians And Appointed Officer Holders". There has been many of these letters sent to members of congress but, strangely, I have never heard of ONE sender getting a reply.

Therefore, I am in favor of polygraphing your Board of Elections and your whole state congressional body.

Twoblock