Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Sep 11, 2003, 05:26 PM
Yes, the "Backster technique" is just another form of probable-lie CQT.
Posted by mike
 - Sep 10, 2003, 12:13 PM
So basically it is just a better way of scoring the test, and asking the questions.  Other than that there is no real difference between that and other probable lie  CQT's right?  
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Sep 10, 2003, 03:45 AM
Marty,

See also, "The Plants Respond: An Interview With Cleve Backster" by Derrick Jensen.

It's also worth noting that Cleve Backster is the founder of the CIA's polygraph program.
Posted by Marty
 - Sep 08, 2003, 07:29 PM
Quote from: Mike on Sep 08, 2003, 01:26 PMWhat is the Backster Technique?  How does it work?

George has filled you in on one "Technique" Clive is known for, there is another George graciously didn't re-itterate this time.

He polygraphs plants. In fact he "discovered" that plants could be polygraphed. See the chapter on Clive in this book's cast of characters.

http://www.biomindsuperpowers.com/Pages/2.html

Here's an excerpt:

I protested that I had no idea how to influence plants. But he smiled and said that all I had to do was TO THINK of harming it. "Just think of lighting a match with the intent of burning one of its leaves."

So, I thought as much while staring at the plant. And Behold! The polygraph needle went haywire -- so much so that the tracing went off the paper graph sheet.
Backster, typically cool as a cucumber, now seemed to get a little excited. "Can you do that again?"
So I tried again, and bingo by Ingo! He asked me to keep on doing it. But after a few more attempts the polygraph needle started not to react as much and finally didn't at all.

"What does THAT mean," I asked.
"You tell me."
Then a very eerie thought occurred to me, so astonishing that it caused goosebumps.
"Do you mean," I asked, "that it has LEARNED that I'm not serious about really burning its leaf? So that it now knows it need not be alarmed."

-Marty
Posted by mike
 - Sep 08, 2003, 06:47 PM
Thank you for your response.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Sep 08, 2003, 05:42 PM
Cleve Backster developed a version of the probable-lie "control" question "test" that is known as the "Zone Comparison Test" (ZCT). In this technique, which is widely used for the interrogation of criminal suspects, reactions to relevant questions are compared with reactions to adjacent "control" questions. You'll find some sample ZCT formats in Appendix B of The Lie Behind the Lie Detector.
Posted by mike
 - Sep 08, 2003, 01:26 PM
What is the Backster Technique?  How does it work?