Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by unknown
 - Aug 31, 2003, 02:07 PM
Quote from: George W. Maschke on Aug 31, 2003, 04:57 AMThere is no need to re-post questions. I've replied to your question in the thread CIA using relevant/irrelevant.

my apologoes, I was worried you would not see it.  My test is VERY soon
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Aug 31, 2003, 04:57 AM
There is no need to re-post questions. I've replied to your question in the thread CIA using relevant/irrelevant.
Posted by unknown
 - Aug 31, 2003, 12:00 AM
Can you explain this in more detail? (pg 152 in your book)
 
"In addition, recall that with this technique polygraphers look to "consistent, specific, and significant" responses to a particular relevant question over multiple charts.  You can prevent such a pattern from occurring by simply producing responses to two differing groups of two relevant questions within the different chart presentations."