Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jun 23, 2001, 03:11 PM
Twoblock is correct. The form was drafted by the Missouri Union of Law Enforcement (MULE) and is available here:

http://www.mule57.org/articles/polygrap.htm
Posted by Twoblock (Guest)
 - Jun 23, 2001, 02:45 PM
I think you maybe talking MULE. It's an organization representing law enforcement in Missouri. I remember seeing it on this site, I believe, but don't remember where. If my recollection is accurate, it is a contract preventing employment polygraph results to be used in a criminal investigation. This document is to be presented to the polygrapher. If the polygrapher won't sign it, then the officer refuses to take the exam.

I wish I could help you more.

Twoblock
Posted by beech trees
 - Jun 23, 2001, 01:28 PM
Recently I read a thread on these boards in which an external link to a document (I believe associated with a Missouri law enforcement organization) was given. This document was a wonderful legally binding form that, when signed by the polygrapher, would preclude the use of damaging admissions by the testee for criminal prosecution. If this rings a bell with anyone I would appreciate the link again. Thank you,