Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by jkorchids
 - Sep 15, 2002, 08:25 PM
On April 30th, Antipolygraph Org printed an article on "Backer suggests polygraphs for Priests". Please don't be fooled into thinking Attorney Ed Ricci believes in them. He has his own private examiner/investigator/etc. that does not print out any info, much less write reports on results. He is a smooth operator. He lulls clients in, and to stay within Florida ethics laws, claims clients failed exams and dismisses them. He is not a Criminal lawyer! Plain and simple. If there is not big bucks in the lawsuit, then its goodby client. Nice and neat. I know, my wife is one of his victims. Polygraphs work for him.. JK...