Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Apr 07, 2023, 07:43 AM
QuoteI wonder if federal agencies and contractors are giving stern warnings to applicants and employees about posting on this site.

Federal applicants and employees are well advised not to post here in their own name or without using Tor Browser or a VPN.

While I don't recall any specific reports of agencies admonishing applicants and employees not to post here, I am familiar with a case where a federal employee was advised against researching polygraphy.
Posted by Dead
 - Apr 06, 2023, 02:37 AM
I wonder if federal agencies and contractors are giving stern warnings to applicants and employees about posting on this site.  The forum has been pretty dead this year.  Is anyone out there willing to post here and tell us what their agency has said lately about visiting Antipolygraph.org? 
Posted by pailryder
 - Oct 27, 2022, 06:35 AM
The site is not dead, just the issue.
Posted by Dead
 - Sep 30, 2022, 08:53 AM
This site is dead.  Where is everyone?  Nobody has any polygraph stories or news to report anymore?  Or have the alphabet soup agencies told everyone to shut up and if they go to this site, let alone post on here, bad things will happen to them.