Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by pailryder
 - Dec 15, 2022, 07:19 PM
Your story seems true to me and I find no fault in your approach.  And yes any experienced interviewer could have made a more reliable call, but it is less like a coin toss, which is at least fair, it is more likely a predetermined outcome.  They could never say your age is a factor, but wink wink, and I am not saying it happened here, sometimes as examiners we just know these things.

I am surprised that considering your background, you are just now discovering what preemployment polygraphs really are which is illegal in private employment since 1988.  The Employee Polygraph Protection Act. 

Oh yeah, the feds exempted themselves.