Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Jul 22, 2014, 11:40 AM
I haven't seen any government-wide policy statement on such matters, but provided no admissions have been made that would preclude granting of a security clearance, I don't think failing an NSA polygraph necessarily means disqualification from holding a security clearance with another agency. However, I think the fact of the failed polygraph will be made known to adjudicators for the other agency, and that may make granting of a security clearance less likely.
Posted by anon12414132
 - Jul 20, 2014, 08:12 PM
suppose person fails all nsa polys & doesnt get ts/sci. what happens if they apply for secret or top secret clearance (no poly needed)? can they still get those clearances?