Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last month of the year?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Fair Chance
 - Sep 09, 2011, 09:49 PM
George has put it in a very polite way. My interpretation of the answer to your question:

"Do as we say you should do, not as we have done."

Yes, it reeks of sarcasm as elected officials are allowed to flaunt the responsibilities of their past because they are "elected." I blame the voters for not writing in any other candidate when they are frustrated, even if it is "Donald Duck."

Go figure.

Regards.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Sep 08, 2011, 08:35 AM
Polygraphs are for the ruled, not the rulers.
Posted by SantaClaus
 - Sep 06, 2011, 09:18 AM
He admitted to using cocaine, any LE department around here would disqualify you automatically for that, yet he can do it and become the president. Does this make any sense at all?