Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What sport is the Super Bowl associated with?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by beech trees
 - Jun 26, 2002, 01:47 AM
Fox News' show 'On the Record With Greta Van Susteren' this evening (as most evenings since this happened) discussed the missing girl. I wish I had taken note of the fellow's name, but an FBI representative (I think retired) being interviewed made the incredible assertion that 100% of the people the FBI have polygraphed that have 'failed' the poly were guilty. 100%. This was in response to the observation that this Ricci fellow apparently DI'd his poly.

If anyone saw the show perhaps they can flesh it out, as I had it on in the background.
Posted by BENNY
 - Jun 18, 2002, 02:00 PM
A polygraph "examiner" on one of the cable news stations yesterday was interviewed.  After reading this site its funny the perpective you when these guys are asked questions by the press and how they try to legitimize themselves.  During the interview the news ladys said "Polygraphs are not admissable in court:correct", to which he replied, "they are under stipulations" angry at the lady.  What a dumb remark, what he really meant is in some cases if both parties agree to the "polygraph". The newslady was also asking what did it mean when the girls uncles tested "inconclusive".  Is it me or does this really mean the polygraph is a copout in case they are found guilty.  They simply give a polygraph for such an important matter and its "inconclusive"????  What a sham.  I assume this really means he failed by the equipment but the examiners do not want to put their profession on the line.