Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is the last name of the first U.S. president?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by George W. Maschke
 - May 15, 2009, 03:15 PM
Paula,

The polygraph can be useful for interrogating suspects who do not understand that the lie detector is a sham. People who think that the lie detector will detect any deception may choose to be more honest than they would otherwise be.

However, polygraph "testing" has no scientific basis. The procedure is inherently biased against the truthful, and deceptive persons who understand polygraph procedure can use simple techniques called countermeasures to pass.
Posted by paulia84
 - May 15, 2009, 03:04 PM
Welcome all,
The subject of possibility of detecting by poligraf the corruption be interested. Do some techniques exist , which make possible this ? Some books, article`s?
I am from Europe and I from mountain apologize for my English.
Paula