Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What color are the stars on the U.S. flag?:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Onesimus
 - Feb 08, 2006, 12:10 AM
Using notation (x, y) where x is the agency number and y is the polygraph text number within the agency...

During polygraph exam (3,3) my polygrapher mentioned a poster on this site by name and suggested they deserved to lose their clearance based on what they had said, presumably during a polygraph session.  He made these statements after I had signed a statement stating they would not release information obtained during the exam to family, friends, etc.  He even spent some time emphasizing this point during my exam.

He did not use the examinee's real name, and didn't say specifically what the person said.  But he did give me the name they use on this site and said they didn't deserve to have a clearance based on what he said.  As far as I'm concerned, they shouldn't be doing this and I'd be very angry if they bad-mouthed me during someone else's exam.  Be sure to let me know if you ever hear my name during an exam.