Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
How many sides does a stop sign have? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by gelb disliker
 - Nov 30, 2005, 06:22 AM
They just might find him guilty due to the fact that he was supposedly near the Holloway girl.  Media attention seems to make one guilty if held in the limelight long enough.   A failed polygraph would just bury him into morass of the guilty.
Posted by Smokey
 - Nov 30, 2005, 06:09 AM
I was just watching Fox News' "On The Record" and a part of an interview with Deepac Scalpo, a suspect in Natalie Holloway's disappearance, was aired in which an investigator advised him that he would be foolish to not take the poly if he was innocent.  I am personally led to believe that he had something to do or knows what happened with Natalie and would like to see him brought to justice if he is guilty, but I just wanted to get some opinions on him taking the ploygraph.