Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by polyscam
 - Oct 19, 2005, 11:49 AM
George,

Thank you for the insight.  I am not familiar with the SF86 as I have never seen it.  I figure the governmental reliance on polygraph screening would surely apply to translators trusted with sensitive classified information thusly resulting in a full scope test, however I realize my assumption is conjecture as this is not mentioned in the linked report.  It would seem his background check, possibly including polygraph screening, was a complete failure.
Posted by George W. Maschke
 - Oct 19, 2005, 04:41 AM
Brandon,

I seem to recall reading somewhere that the Arabic translators Titan sent to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba had been required to submit to polygraph screening. Perhaps the same is true with regard to those sent to Iraq.

However, the DoD's standard polygraph screening technique, the "Test for Espionage and Sabotage," does not include any relevant questions about the examinee's identity or the accuracy of information provided in the examinee's Standard Form 86 (Questionnaire for National Security Positions).
Posted by polyscam
 - Oct 18, 2005, 10:14 PM
Below is a link to information found at thesmokinggun.com in regard to a man who managed to become naturalized as well as infiltrate US interests and receive a high level security clearance with use of fraudulent information including name, origin, date of birth, etc.  Although, nothing can be found in the report which states the man was subjected to a polygraph exam, he was subjected to a DOD background check which likely included a polygraph exam.

link:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/1017051malki1.html