Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Attachments: (Clear attachments)
Restrictions: 4 per post (4 remaining), maximum total size 192 KB, maximum individual size 64.00 MB
Uncheck the attachments you no longer want attached
Click or drag files here to attach them.
(Clear attachments)
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
What is 10 minus 4? (numeral):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by importscout
 - Jul 08, 2005, 05:17 PM
Good advice.  I found out about all of this stuff a little late in the game (the night before) my first poly.  Live and learn on my part.
Posted by polyfool
 - Jul 08, 2005, 11:57 AM
Importscout:

Sounds like you may have mistook some controls for relevants based on your post. The calibration period is also known as the stim test. This is described in detail in TLBTLD. Maybe you should have spent more time reading the free information instead of shelling out money to read  Doug's online book. Also, if you had planned on lying I would think you would have spent a little more time studying.
Posted by importscout
 - Jul 08, 2005, 09:05 AM

I have no qualms in openly admitting that I have every intention of lying on my polygraph.  I do not believe that it is anybody's business to coerce information out of me that is not readily available in my spotlessly clean background record - simply because I am applying for a career in law enforcement.  

That said, I breifly read Doug's online book and did not have any time to practice before my first-ever Poly with my second-choice agency.  There were VERY few control questions & irrelevant questions used - a grand total of 3 questions, 1 of which was irrelevant, the remaining 13 were all relevant.  The chair I was in was made of wood with absolutely no padding, so I felt it safe to use the anal sphincter reaction for the controls.  This was not enough, and the fear of having lied when asked 'how many times i've used marijuana' showed enough of a result for me to fail the test.  I was shocked in how few controls were used.  

There was a 'calibration' period that consisted of only controls and irrelevants.  This was meant to adjust the computer and compensate for my level of nervousness.  I have not read anything about the 'calibration' series - is it a good idea to show elevated reactions for this period?

My interrogator was deliberately nasty and hardnosed.  After reading the information on this site, I am shocked at how subjective the 'test' is - and that even the way in which I answered 'yes' or 'no' may have swayed the test.  

Best of luck to everyone in their polygraph woes.  I will be sure to practice as much as possible for my first choice agency.