Polygraph Screening

Holdings of the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute

as of 1 December 1999

1.	Abuses in polygraph testing. Security Letter. 1986; 16(17, part 1, September 1). ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 7313Keywords: preemployment screening/ polygraph-professionCall Number: ODS, P 7313

2.	Anti-polygraph bill may actually improve business for contract guary companies. Security Business. 1988; 18(13, part 3).Rec #: 7078Keywords: preemployment screening/ anti-polygraph lawsCall Number: ODS, P 7078

3.	Anti-polygraph bill passes senate labor panel. But its not so anti anymore. Security Letter. 1986; 16(14, part 1, July 1). ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 7312Keywords: preemployment screening/ employee screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7312

4.	ASIS In Action: Finding Mr./Ms. Right. Security Management. 1990; 34(1):8.Rec #: 9700Keywords: screening/ stress/ American Society For Industrial SecurityCall Number: ODS, P 9700

5.	ASIS statement on S. 1904. Security Management. 1988:131-132, 135-136.Rec #: 7570Keywords: employee screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7570

6.	Bitter beercott: a dispute over privacy rights. Time. 1977 Dec 26:110.Rec #: 721Keywords: screening-commercial/ Coors Industries/ labor dispute-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 721

7.	. False-negatives in screening tests; 1987.Rec #: 6710Keywords: screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6710Notes: Paper presented at the Federal Interagency Polygraph Seminar FBI Academy, Juen 18, 1987

8.	Family chat. with polygraph. Time. 1992; 284(1704, May):22. ISSN: 0017-789x.Rec #: 7000Keywords: screening/ drug use/ childrenCall Number: ODS, P 7000

9.	Federal judge dismisses industry challenge to polygraph test restrictions. Corporate Security Digest. 1989; 3(4, February 1).Rec #: 7488Keywords: constitutional rights/ screening/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7488Notes: suited by security firm

10.	Federal polygraph law enacted. Personnel Journal. 1988; August:26.Rec #: 6353Keywords: preemployment screening/ background investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 6353, 9903

11.	Federal polygraph policies - Described in Senate testimony. Polygraph. 1985; 14(2):126-128.Rec #: 1699Keywords: applications-personnel security/ applications-espionage/ applications-counterintelligence/ screening-government/ U.S. Air Force Personnel Security program/ U.S. Army Personnel Security program/ screening-Air Force/ screening-Army/ screening-FBI/ Federal Bureau of Investigation/ Boyce, Christopher J.Call Number: Library

12.	Golden age of polygraph comes to an end as Reagan signs bill to limit its use. Security Letter. 1988; 18(13, part 1).Rec #: 7079Keywords: Employee Polygraph Protection Act/ investigations-commercial/ preemployment / preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7079

13.	Have you ever owed a bar bill? Harper's. 1986; 272(March):14-17.Rec #: 2301Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 2301

14.	How a lie detector works. McCall's. 1969(April ):52.Rec #: 2571Keywords: physiological responses/ screening/ breathing changes/ GSR/ electrocardiogramCall Number: ODS, P 2571

15.	If you're asked to take a lie detector test....... Changing Times. 1984; 38(7, July):66-70. ISSN: 0009-143x.Rec #: 2645Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism-rightsCall Number: ODS, P 2645

16.	It's a lie. Nation's Business. 1985; 73(12, December):12-13.Rec #: 2751Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2751, 9903

17.	Keith Anderson et al. vs. The City of Philadlephia et al., appellants. 198821.Rec #: 9824Keywords: preemployment screening/ casesCall Number: ODS, P 9824Notes: United Sates Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit No. 87-1546. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennesylvania (Civil Action No. 86-7571)

18.	Lie detector tests lose out. U. S. News & World Report. 1988(July 11):65-66. ISSN: 0041-5537.Rec #: 7192Keywords: employees/ applications-screening/ sexual harassmentCall Number: ODS, P 7192

19.	Lying for a job. Psychology Today. 1988; 22(July/August):80.Rec #: 7041Keywords: polygraph/ employment interview/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7041

20.	Lying in congress. Fortune. 1987; 116(December):186.Rec #: 7415Keywords: employee screening/ stressCall Number: ODS, P 7415

21.	Marines excluded from polygraph screening. Security Letter. 1987; 17(7, part 1, April 1). ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 7318Keywords: U.S. Marine Corps/ espionage/ false statementsCall Number: ODS, P 7318

22.	Maryland State Police applicant polygraph screening technique. Pikesville, MD: Maryland State Police; 1975; p. 11. Rec #: 3726Keywords: screening-police-Maryland/ question formulation-screening/ law-waiver-MarylandCall Number: ODS, P 3726, 9903

23.	Model guidelines for preemployment integrity testing programs. The Association of Personnel Test Publishers; 1990.Rec #: 9875Keywords: integrity testing/ screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 9875

24.	More on the Safire columns. Will biodata replace the polygraph? Security Letter. 1987; 17(7, part 1, April 1). ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 7317Keywords: preemployment screening/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 7317

25.	Now a furor over lie detectors in business. U. S. News & World Report. 1976(March 8).Rec #: 7100Keywords: screening-employment/ preemployment screening/ PSECall Number: ODS, P 7100

26.	Outlawing lie detector tests for private jobs? Nation's Business. 1975(June):23. ISSN: 0028-047X.Rec #: 4251Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4251, 9903

27.	Paper and pencil employment screening tests: No legal barriers to use in 48 states. Security Letter. 1987; 17(19, part 1, October 17). ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 7320Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ employee screening/ preemployment screening/ legal issuesCall Number: ODS, P 7320

28.	The polygraph: Another year of attacks begins. The Moscow embassy case. Security Letter. 1987; 17(7, part 1, April 1). ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 7319Keywords: Soviet Union/ employee screening/ labor relationsCall Number: ODS, P 7319

29.	The polygraph as a truth detector. The Office. 1970(August):39-41.Rec #: 4405Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4405

30.	Polygraph curbs implemented. Corporate Security Digest. 1989; 3(1).Rec #: 7577Keywords: American Civil Liberties Union/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7577

31.	Polygraph: Issues and answers. Polygraph . 1996; 25(2 ):134-146.Rec #: 5097Keywords: Employee-Screening/ Criminal InvestigationCall Number: Library

32.	The polygraph principle has not lost its importance. Corporate Security. 1988(June).Rec #: 7483Keywords: Los Angeles/ lying/ preemployment screening/ standardCall Number: ODS, P 7483

33.	Polygraph tests: lie detector or truth distorter? Personnel Journal. 1985; June:33.Rec #: 6349Keywords: preemployment screening/ reliability/ legislation-limitingCall Number: ODS, P 6349, 9903

34.	Polygraphers losing their businesses as the result of new national law. Corporate Security Digest. 1989; 3(6).Rec #: 7578Keywords: psychological testing/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7578

35.	Searching for honest employee. Employee Theft Resource Center . 1986(Fall).Rec #: 7247Keywords: employee screening/ APA/ paper and pencil tests/ blood pressure/ licensing/ deception/ polygraph techniques/ guilty knowledge/ Lykken, David T./ Reid ReportCall Number: ODS, P 7247Abstract: Articles included are Polygraph: Employer's ally or employee's enemy?. Polygraph vs. Pen & pencil test. Why is the polygraph worth all the furor?. The pen that's mightier than the lie. Choosing your honesty tool.

36.	Security closeup: The polygraph strikes back. Security Management. 1985; 1414(Section II):July 25.Rec #: 5134Keywords: utility/ Department of Defense/ Bush, George/ Central Intelligence Agency/ Devine, David/ American Polygraph Association/ screening-federal/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 5134

37.	. Security practices in the National Security Agency (Defection of Bernon F. Mitchell and William H. Martin). Report by the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives, 87th Congress, 2nd Session; 1962 Aug 13Washington, DC: GPO23 p.Rec #: 9916Keywords: NSA/ screening-national security/ defections/ Mitchell, Bernon F./ Martin, William H.Call Number: ODS, P 9916

38.	Shultz: A flutter. Newsweek. 1985; 106(December 30):20.Rec #: 6433Keywords: employee screening/ Shultz, GeorgeCall Number: ODS, P 6433

39.	Stehney v. Perry 1995 wl 688283 fed supp (d.n.j.). Polygraph . 1996; 25(1 ):81-99.Rec #: 9873Keywords: law-6th amendment/ Employees-ScreeningCall Number: Library

40.	Texas State Employees Union v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, et.al. 1987 Oct 28.Rec #: 6986Keywords: mental state/ employee screening/ deception cues/ physiological responses/ admissibilityCall Number: ODS, P 6986Notes: Opinion, Supreme Court of Texas, C-5384

41.	To catch a mole. Time. 1985; 125(January 28):45.Rec #: 6436Keywords: employee screening/ blood pressure/ breathing changes/ accuracy/ perspirationCall Number: ODS, P 6436

42.	To tell the truth. Security Management Plant & Property Protection. 1976(504):1-4.Rec #: 331Keywords: screening-commercial-ArtherCall Number: ODS, P 331

43.	U. S. District Court supports police polygraph screening. Polygraph. 1974; 3(4):412-416.Rec #: 7514Keywords: screening/ court rulingsCall Number: Library

44.	The victims of lie detector tests. UFCW Action. 1986(May-June):16-17.Rec #: 7126Keywords: polygraph-criticismCall Number: ODS, P 7126Notes: Includes The case of the man who knew his own name, The case of the missing drugs, The case of the ineffective state law, The case of the missing money, The case of the screening examiner, The case of the examiner's wandering hands, The case of the accused test minipulator, The case of the deodorant powder

45.	Why the polygraph is important to business, especially small business. Security Letter. 1980; 10(6):1-2.Rec #: 6025Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 6025

46.	Aberth, John. Pre-employment testing is losing favor. Personnel Journal . 1986; 65(9 ):96, 98, 101-102, 104.Rec #: 9215Keywords: preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 9215Abstract: Describes American Management Association survey findings with regard to the uses of pre-employment testing, as reported by 7,000 US human resource managers. Results show that most Ss did not test at all, and the average financial investment of those who did was $400. Psychological and job-skill tests comprised most of the testing still used, although there were indications of dissatisfaction with psychological tests. After psychological tests, job skills were the next most frequently used tests, followed by behavior simulation (recreation of the environment in which the candidate will work), and polygraphs. Testing distribution varied widely with regard to position, with high incidences among computer programmers, accountants, and human resources specialists and lower-level positions. Psychological testing was especially popular with high-level positions. Financial officers and sales managers received the most polygraph testing, whereas plant personnel managers and telemarketing managers underwent the most behavior simulation. Diversified conglomerates and government/military bureaus were the biggest users of job-skills testing. There was no correlation between testing and organization size, but smaller companies reported their intent to spend less on programs already in place.

47.	Abrams, Stanley; Marcy, Lynn P.; Weir, Raymond J.; Zimmerman, Charles H., and Zonn, Lincoln M. APA reviews the polygraph, employees and unions. Security World. 1972; 9(10):48-52.Rec #: 7Keywords: American Polygraph Association/ screening-commercial-generalCall Number: ODS, P 7

48.	Abramson, Gil A. To catch a thief.... Baltimore Labor. 1985(June):54.Rec #: 41Keywords: legislation-state/ Maryland/ screening-commercial-favorableCall Number: ODS, P 41

49.	Abzug, Bella S. Ban on polygraphs introduced. Congressional Record . 1976; 122(56, April 13):3346-3349.Rec #: 46Keywords: legislation-federal/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 46Notes: 94th Congress, Second Session

50.	Accelerated access authorization program (AAAP). Albuquerque, NM: Department of Energy; nd.Rec #: 8971Keywords: techniques-CSP/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 8971

51.	Admiral Inman recommends polygraph tests for national security. APA Newsletter. 1985; 18(3, May/June):8.Rec #: 67Keywords: applications-national security/ question formulation-screening/ screening-federalCall Number: Library

52.	AFL-CIO. The "lie detector" Guilty until proven innocent. Washington, DC: AFL-CIO Maritime Trades Department ; 1970 Feb 12.Rec #: 76Keywords: screening-commercial-opposed/ criticism-civilrights/ screening-commercial-unionsCall Number: Library 323.44 Af1lNotes: First in a series of reports on invasion of privacy in America

53.	Agee, Philip. Inside the company: CIA diary. New York: Stonehill Publishing Company; 1975; pp. 10-17, 29, 47-50. Rec #: 78Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ screening-CIA/ Central Intelligence AgencyCall Number: Library, 327.12094 Ag3iNotes: Reprinted New York: Bantam, 1976.

54.	Ahern, James D. Individuals who have failed urinalysis drug tests. 1986 Sep.Rec #: 6394Keywords: drug screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6394Notes: Unpublished manuscript

55.	All FBI Applicants Must Take Polygraph Test. Narcotics Control Digest . 1994; 24(6, March 16):6-7.Rec #: 9569Keywords: screening-preemployment/ FBI/ applicantsCall Number: ODS, P 9569

56.	Alleged toothpaste contamination solved by polygraph. APA Newsletter. 1983; 16(4):13.Rec #: 93Keywords: cases-contamination of product/ screening-commercial-product protectionCall Number: Library

57.	Allen, John. Memorandum for Dr. John F. Beary, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Health Affairs . 1983 Jul 223 p.Rec #: 95Keywords: regulations-Department of Defense/ screening-Department of Defense/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 168Notes: Comments on revised draft DoD 5210.48 and DoD draft regulation 5210.48-12

58.	Allen, R. E. Lie detector pays . American City. 1939; 54(150):15. ISSN: 0002-7936.Rec #: 99Keywords: screening-Toledo, Ohio/ historical interest-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 99

59.	American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Polygraph. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1986; 256(9):1172-1175.Rec #: 2342Keywords: criticism/ American Medical Association/ AMA/ researchCall Number: ODS, P 2342Notes: John H. Moxley, Chairman; William R. Hendee, SecretaryAbstract: Lie detector tests, recording blood pressure, pulse, respirations, and galvanic skin resistance while questions are asked, have been offered in court as evidence since the 1920's. The courts have still not entirely accepted polygraph evidence. However, employers are using it for security clearance, screening, cheating, and determination of paternity. These uses have not been adequately studied, but the test is not yet reliable enough to be the sole arbiter of guilt or innocence in a criminal trial. It is no more accurate when applied to personnel screening. Though the polygraph can recognize guilty suspects with an accuracy that is better than chance, error rates of significant size are possible. Until testing and its scoring can be shown to be valid with a high level of predictability, the AMA should not support the polygraphy test in industry or in the Federal Government as a preemployment test.

60.	American Psychological Association. APA resolution says reliability of polygraph test "unsatisfactory." [APA press release]. 1986 Feb 1.Rec #: 119Keywords: American Psychological Association/ criticism-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 119Notes: 2 p.

61.	---. Polygraphs unsuitable for employment screening, APA tells Congress [press release]. 1987(March 5).Rec #: 120Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ American Psychological Association/ criticism-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 120Notes: 2 p.

62.	American Society for Industrial Security. Statement concerning the Polygraph Protection Act of 1985 (Senate Bill S. 1815) . Hearings before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the United States Senate, 99 Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: GPO; 1986: 297-309. 11 p.Rec #: 122Keywords: legislation-federal-screening-ban/ screening-commercial-legislation/ American Society for Industrial SecurityCall Number: ODS, P 122, Library, 658.3112 Un3p

63.	An outline: psychological sources for pre-employment screening [Part 2]. Security Letter. 1979; 9(8):1-2.Rec #: 4252Keywords: screening-generalCall Number: ODS, P 4252

64.	Andrews, Lori B. How lie detectors lie. Parents. 1983; March:26-31.Rec #: 9680Keywords: applications/ preemployment screening/ psychological stress evaluator/ credibility assessmentCall Number: ODS, P 9680

65.	Ansley, Norman. Accuracy and utility of RI screening by student examiners at DoDPI. Fort Meade, MD: National Security Agency; 1989.Rec #: 6399Keywords: techniques-R&I/ utility/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 6399

66.	---. A comparison of two standard techniques in an operational polygraph setting. 198720 p.Rec #: 6262Keywords: techniques-counterintelligence screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6262Notes: identical paper also dated 1988in file

67.	---. Federal and state case law on polygraph screening. nd.Rec #: 6581Keywords: screening/ law-federal/ law-stateCall Number: ODS, P 6581Notes: in file

68.	---. House of Representatives hearing on Pentagon polygraph regulation. APA Newsletter. 1982; 15(6):5-10.Rec #: 200Keywords: legislation-federal/ screening-government/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: Library

69.	---. Police Applicant Screening--A Bibliography. Polygraph. 1993; 22(1):120-124.Rec #: 9572Keywords: screening-police/ applicants/ bibliographiesCall Number: Library

70.	---. Police screening - The results of 413 examinations. Maryland Polygraph Review. 1975(April):2-7.Rec #: 167Keywords: screening-police/ Maryland/ cases-screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 167

71.	---. Polygraph in the federal service. 1984 Oct 155.Rec #: 9683Keywords: preemployment screening/ detection of deceptionCall Number: ODS, P 9683Notes: Paper prepared for the SECOM meeting, October 15, 1984, Williamsburg, Virginia

72.	---. Research on the validity of the relevant-irrelevant technique as used in screening. Polygraph. 1980; 9(3):153-161.Rec #: 197Keywords: validity/ techniques-R&I/ screening/ bibliographiesCall Number: ODS, P 197, Library

73.	---. Statement of Norman Ansley, Chief, Polygraph Division, Office of Security, National Security Agency . Hearing before the Investigations Subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, 98th Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 4681, Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Sep 6: 45-62. Rec #: 211Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ screening-NSA/ validity-research/ validity-field research/ cases-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 211, Library 351.1325 Un3hNotes: Relating to the administration of polygraph examinations and prepublication review requirements by federal agencies

74.	---. Testimony of Norman Ansley, Chief, Polygraph Division, Office of Security, National Security Agency. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 98th Congress, First and Second Sessions, on Presidential Directive on the use of polygraphs and prepublication review Washington, DC: GPO; 1983 Apr 2156-64.Rec #: 206Keywords: screening-federal/ legislation-federal/ examiners-federal/ hearings-federalCall Number: ODS, P 206, Library 351.1325 Un3p

75.	---. Testimony of Norman Ansley, Chief, Polygraph Division, Office of Security, National Security Agency. Hearing before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, 98th Congress, Second Session, on Polygraphs for counterintelligence purposes in the Department of DefenseWashington, DC: GPO; 1984 Mar 7: 44-53, 87-94. Rec #: 209Keywords: screening-government/ cases-counterintelligence/ applications-counterintelligence/ surveys-CI test results/ Department of Defense-polygraph programs/ National Security Agency-polygraph programsCall Number: ODS, P 209Notes: Printed in Polygraph, 13, 166-176.

76.	---. U.S. District Court supports police polygraph screening. Polygraph. 1974; 3(4):412-416.Rec #: 156Keywords: screening-police-San Francisco/ law-screening-police/ San Francisco Police DepartmentCall Number: Library

77.	---. Validity and the relevant-irrelevant technique, abstracts of research. 1979 Nov 10.Rec #: 194Keywords: validity-relevant-irrelevant techniques/ reliability-relevant-irrelevant techniques/ screening-general/ research-validity/ techniques-RICall Number: ODS, P 194Notes: Paper presented at the annual seminar of the Maryland Polygraph Association, Anne Arundel Community College, Arnold, MD

78.	---. Vermont State Police polygraph service. Polygraph. 1973; 2(3):239-244.Rec #: 153Keywords: cases-criminal/ admissibility-Vermont/ surveys-statistical/ screening-police-VermontCall Number: Library

79.	Ansley, Norman and Abrams, Stanley. The polygraph profession. Linthicum Heights, MD: American Polygraph Association; 1980. Rec #: 233Keywords: history/ law/ psychology/ physiology/ techniques-general/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ American Polygraph Association/ bibliographies/ ethicsCall Number: Library 347.7362 An8p

80.	Ansley, Norman; Garwood, Marcia, and Barland, Gordon H. The accuracy and utility of polygraph testing. Washington, DC: Department of Defense; 1984. Rec #: 237Keywords: validity-field examinations/ validity-laboratory/ reliability-test data analysis-blind/ research-validity-field/ research-validity-laboratory/ research-reliability-field/ research-reliability-field/ cases-criminal/ cases-counterintelligence/ surveys-statistical-subjects/ applications-counterintelligence/ applications-criminal casesCall Number: Library 363.254 Ac2Notes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 13, 1-143. Reprinted as a separate publication by the American Polygraph Association, 1984.Abstract: Information on polygraph use in the Federal Goverment, particularly the Department of Defense, focuses on the number of examiners and annual polygraph utilization by Federal agencies. The polygraph as an aid in criminal investigation and exculpatory examination is discussed; data and examples on criminal conduct revealed during screening examinations are presented. The history of the use of polygraph examinations in intelligence, counterintelligence and security is included; specific examples of polygraph examinations revealing espionage are cited. A survey of the history of traditional polygraph methods from 1953 to 1983 looks at testing techniques, such as zone comparison, modified general question, relevant/irrelevant association, and peak of tension method. Also reviewed are (1)Research on Polygraph criterion validity and reliability based on laboratory and field studies, (2)studies investigating the relationship between the examiner's decision and the criteria of truth and deception, and (3)studies investigating the relationship between the decision of a blind examiner and actual truth or deception using verified polygraph cases. A discussion of problems and issues involved in lie detection finds evidence suggesting that control question tests may be more accurate in detecting the deception of the guilty person than in verifying the truthfulness of the < innocent person. Research studies to determine the validity and reliability of the polygraph in a field setting are also summarized. Tabular data and 38 references are provided

81.	Ansley, Norman and Horvath, Frank S. Bibliography on screening of police applicants with the polygraph. Polygraph. 1975; 4(3):282-284.Rec #: 238Keywords: screening-police/ bibliographiesCall Number: ODS, P 238, Library

82.	Ansley, Norman and Pumphrey, Janet K. Justice and the polygraph. Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association; 1985.Rec #: 243Keywords: cases-general/ applications-general/ surveys-subjectsCall Number: Library, 363.254 J98Abstract: Cases were selected from Government and American Polygraph Association publications. A brief note on the source is included with each citation. Cases are grouped by their use with innocent persons (eyewitnesses, the falsely accused, victims) and guilty persons (to obtain confessions, lead to evidence, or expose false testimony), as well as in applications to employment screening, parole and probation supervision, and espionage investigations. In addition, articles are included on such specific topics as polygraph employment screening, handling shoplifting, Federal statistics, and surveys of attitudes toward the use of the polygraph. An extensive index cites cases by offense committed, geographical location, name of examiner, agency involved, author, and other topics. (Author abstract modified)

83.	---. Survey results: Polygraph exams of 100 police and fire applicants. Journal of Healthcare Protection Management. 1986; 2:86-93.Rec #: 244Keywords: surveys-employees/ preemployment screening-generalCall Number: ODS, P 244

84.	Ansley, Norman and Weir, Raymond J. Statistical study on the use of the Polygraph as a personnel security screening aid. 195311, + 13 tables.Rec #: 9690Keywords: security screening/ background investigations/ statistical analysisCall Number: ODS, P 9690

85.	Arata, Clarence. Statement of the Metropolitan Board of Trade. Polygraph Review. 1975; 2(2, October):14-16.Rec #: 253Keywords: licensing-District of Columbia/ screening-commercial-District of ColumbiaCall Number: ODS, P 253

86.	Army Chief of Staff endorses polygraph tests in national security. APA Newsletter. 1985; 18(3, May/June):8-9.Rec #: 262Keywords: screening-federal/ applications-national securityCall Number: Library

87.	Arnold, David W. and Thiemann, Alan J. Psychological Testing In ADA's Wake. Security Management. 1994; 38(1):43-45.Rec #: 9577Keywords: screening-employment/ psychological testing/ legal status/ employees/ Americans with Disabilities Act/ discriminationCall Number: ODS, P 9577

88.	Arther, Catherine A. and Arther, Richard O. The effective alternative. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1988; 22(6, May-June):1-3.Rec #: 278Keywords: screening-commercial-interviewingCall Number: ODS, P 278

89.	Arther, Richard O. How many robbers, buglars, sex criminals is your department hiring this year? The Journal of Polygraph Studies. 1972; 6(6, May-June).Rec #: 316Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 316Notes: Reprinted in Pennsylvania Law Enforcement Journal, (1956, June), 50-55

90.	---. Periodic polygraph examinations. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1974; 9(1, July-August).Rec #: 324Keywords: periodic examinations/ screening-commercial-periodicCall Number: ODS, P 324

91.	---. Polygraph enemies: An update. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1986; 20(5):1-4.Rec #: 362Keywords: screening-generalCall Number: Library

92.	---. Polygraph picks potential policemen. The Journal of Polygraph Studies. 1967; 2(2, September-October).Rec #: 298Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 298

93.	---. Reducing company pre-employment "no-shows". Journal of Polygraph Science. 1980; 15(1, July-August):3-4.Rec #: 342Keywords: screening-commercial-Arther/ business aspectsCall Number: ODS, P 342

94.	---. The security clearance polygraph examination. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1988; 22(5, March-April):1-4.Rec #: 370Keywords: screening-police/ applicants/ techniques-ArtherCall Number: ODS, P 370

95.	---. The subversive in the police department. The Journal of Polygraph Studies. 1968; 2(6, May-June).Rec #: 301Keywords: screening-police/ applications-subversion-policeCall Number: ODS, P 301

96.	---. The value of polygraph pre-employments. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1975; 9(4):4.Rec #: 327Keywords: screening-police-ArtherCall Number: Library

97.	---. Why does law enforcement attract so many failures. Law and Order. 1964; 12(9, September):62-69.Rec #: 289Keywords: screening-police-ArtherCall Number: ODS, P 289

98.	Arther, Richard O.; Robertson, Bruce P., and Redstone, Philip L. Model polygraph guidelines for accreditation: Part One. The Journal of Polygraph Science. 1990; 25(2, September-October).Rec #: 6956Keywords: accreditation/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6956

99.	Ash, Philip. The polygraph in pre-employment screening: Research on pre-employment use. Polygraph. 1980; 9(1):17-26.Rec #: 384Keywords: screening-general-Reid/ validity-screening-commercial/ surveys-applicants/ surveys-employeesCall Number: Library

100.	---. Screening employment applicants for attitudes toward theft. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1971; 55(2):161-164.Rec #: 379Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 379, Library

101.	---. Validation of an instrument to predict the likelihood of employee theft; part 2. 1970. 579-580. 2 p.Rec #: 6271Keywords: applications-screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 6271Notes: Proceedings, 78th annual convention, American Psychological Association, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle

102.	Ash, Philip; Slora, Karen B., and Britton, Cynthia F. Police agency officer selection practices. Journal of Police Science and Administration. 1990; 17(4):258-269.Rec #: 9699Keywords: police selection/ screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 9699

103.	Atcheson, Marcia. Polygraph tests in pre-employment screening: Should they be controlled by law? Polygraph. 1980; 9(1):26-30.Rec #: 392Keywords: screening-commercial-law/ legislation-screening-commercialCall Number: Library

104.	Atwood, Walter F. Pre-test interviewing, a critical factor in applicant screening. 1962 Aug 17.Rec #: 400Keywords: screening-federal-pretest/ pretest interview/ errorsCall Number: ODS, P 400Notes: Paper presented to the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners, Chicago, IL

105.	Ayers, Janice and Heineman, Ronald E. Most cost-effective part of the hiring process. Security Management. 1985; 29(3, March):55-56.Rec #: 419Keywords: screening-commercial-applicantsCall Number: ODS, P 419

106.	Backster, Cleve. The lie detector: Fact or Fiction? Washington, D. C.: Lie Detection, Inc.; 1951.Rec #: 9708Keywords: skin conductance/ guilty knowledge/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 9708

107.	Badgley, Theodore M. Psychiatric screening for security. 1964 Oct 36 p.Rec #: 463Keywords: screening-psychiatric/ security screeningCall Number: ODS, P 463Notes: Address to the International Association for Polygraph Research, Munich, Germany

108.	Baker, Rick. Lie detector operator pulls a thread and unravels a murder. Peoria Journal Star. 1980(January 27).Rec #: 484Keywords: screening-commercial-Illinois/ cases-homicideCall Number: ODS, P 484

109.	Bales, John. Polygraph screening banned in Senate bill. APA Monitor. 1988; 19(April):10.Rec #: 487Keywords: criticism/ Raskin, David C./ McGuiness, Kevin/ Harvey, Jay/ Camara, Wayne/ Katkin, Edward/ Saxe, Leonard/ legislation-federal/ American Psychological AssociationCall Number: ODS, P 487

110.	Ban urged on federal use of lie detectors. Behavior Today. 1976(February 9):2-3.Rec #: 493Keywords: criticism-screening-government/ screening-federalCall Number: ODS, P 493

111.	Banks use polygraph tests more than background investigations. APA Newsletter. 1987; 20(4):8.Rec #: 497Keywords: applications-banking/ screening-commercial-bankingCall Number: Library

112.	Bar lie-detection use by private firms? U.S. News and World Report. 1986; 100(February 3):81.Rec #: 8414Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-legislation/ applications-commercial/ employee polygraph protection act/ Williams, Pat/ Talley, LarryCall Number: ODS, P 8414

113.	Barber, William E. Police applicant screening; Chicago, IL. Chicago, IL: Keeler Polygraph Institute; 1964 Jun 29-1964 Jul 3: 1-12. Rec #: 505Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 505Notes: Proceedings of the Keeler Polygraph Institute Alumni Association Seminar

114.	Barefoot, J. Kirk. The bottom line on lie detectors. Wharton Magazine. 1981; 5(2):66. ISSN: 0145-4188.Rec #: 520Keywords: screeningCall Number: ODS, P 520

115.	---. On the side of truth - APA discusses the polygraph, examiner and test - Part II. Security World. 1972(July/August):50-60.Rec #: 9137Keywords: techniques/ instrumentation/ screeningCall Number: ODS, P 9137

116.	---. Statement of J. Kirk Barefoot for the American Polygraph Association. Hearing before the U.S. Department of Labor Washington, DC: GPO; 1980 Jan 29.Rec #: 519Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-investigations/ American Polygraph AssociationCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in APA Newsletter, 13(1), 1-6

117.	---. Testimony of J. Kirk Barefoot, Chief of Security, Cluett, Peabody & Co., New York, representing the American Polygraph Association, accompanied by Charles Marino, Counsel, American Polygraph Association, Chicago. Hearings before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate, on S. 1845, Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection Act; 1977 Nov 15; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: GPO; 1978: 33-196. Rec #: 517Keywords: validity/ licensing-state/ screening-general/ legislation-federalCall Number: ODS, P 517, Library, 342.73 Un3

118.	---. Testimony of J. Kirk Barefoot for the American Polygraph Association. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities of the House Committee on Education and Labor. Polygraph. 1985; 14(3):239-242.Rec #: 521Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ surveysCall Number: Library

119.	Barefoot, J. Kirk; Bliss, George; Burki, Fred; Cohen, Donald, and Marino, Charles F., participants. Labor and legislation panel . In : Ansley, Norman, Ed. Legal admissibility of the polygraph. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1975; pp. 297-327. Rec #: 511Keywords: applications-screening-commercial/ law-screening-commercial/ labor unions/ legislationCall Number: Library 345 L

120.	Barland, Gordon H. (DoD Polygraph Institute). Analysis of DPI studies. Ft. McClellan, AL: DoD Polygraph Institute; 1990 Aug 109 p.Rec #: 567Keywords: research-DoDPICall Number: ODS, P 567Abstract: Comparison of mock crime accuracy at DPI v elsewhere, and mock crime versus mock screening.

121.	---. Bibliography: The use of polygraphs in pre-employment screening. Polygraph. 1974; 3(2):231-234.Rec #: 9455Keywords: screeninng-preemployment/ bibliographiesCall Number: Library

122.	---. The case for the polygraph in employment screening. Personnel Administrator. 1985; 30(9, September):58-65.Rec #: 573Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ cases-theftCall Number: ODS, P 573

123.	---. Polygraph practice and theory: An American perspectiveDepartment of Defense Polygraph Institute, Fort McClellan, AL.Rec #: 6439Keywords: history/ polygraph-theory/ screening/ foreign usage/ validity/ examiners/ utility/ cases-criminal/ cases-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6439

124.	---. The polygraph test in the USA and elsewhere. In : Gale, Anthony, Ed. The polygraph test: Lies, truth and science. London: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1988; pp. 73-95. Rec #: 565Keywords: history/ surveys-examiners/ surveys-foreign use/ theory-general/ theory-base rate/ screening-general/ utility/ theory-screening/ cases-kidnapping/ cases-homicide-Army/ cases-espionageCall Number: ODS, P 565, Library 363.254 P76

125.	---. Statement of Gordon H. Barland. Hearing before the Investigations Subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Forces, House of Representatives, 98th Congress, 2nd Session, on H.R. 4681, the utility of the polygraph in aperiodic testing; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Sep 6: 63-67. Rec #: 558Keywords: utility-screening/ validity-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 558, Library 351.1325 Un3hNotes: Relating to the administration of polygraph examinations and prepublication review requirements by federal agencies

126.	---. Statement on the polygraph technique in screening. 198513 p.Rec #: 562Keywords: screening-validity/ countermeasures/ examiners-qualificationsCall Number: ODS, P 562Notes: Prepared at the request of the Employment Committee, House of Commons, Great Britain

127.	---. A survey of the effect of the polygraph in screening Utah job applicants: Preliminary results. Polygraph. 1977; 6(4):318-323.Rec #: 539Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ surveys-UtahCall Number: Library

128.	---. A survey of the effects of polygraph in screening Utah job applicants. In : Ansley, Norman and Abrams, Stanley, Eds. The polygraph profession . Linthicum Heights, MD: American Polygraph Association; 1980; pp. 37-43, Appendix A. Rec #: 546Keywords: screening-commercial-Utah/ surveys-UtahCall Number: Library 347.7362 An8p

129.	---. Testimony of Gordon H. Barland, Ph.D., American Polygraph Association. Hearing on Pre-employment Security Procedures of the Intelligence Agencies, Subcommittee on Oversight, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, House of Representatives, 96th Congress, First Session; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: GPO; 1979 May 24: 100-117. Rec #: 545Keywords: screening-federal/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ countermeasures/ applications-arms control/ validity-laboratoryCall Number: Library, 353.0074 Un3p

130.	---. The utility of the polygraph in aperiodic screening. Hearing before the Armed Services Committee of the U.S. Senate Washington, DC: GPO ; 1984 Mar 77 p.Rec #: 9113Keywords: screening-aperiodic/ utility/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 9113

131.	---. A validation and reliability study of counterintelligence screening test. 1981 May.Rec #: 548Keywords: screening-counterintelligence/ validity/ techniques-directed lie control test/ reliability/ test data analysis/ numerical scoring/ global scoringCall Number: ODS, P 548Notes: Unpublished manuscript, Security Support Battalion, 902nd Military Intelligence Group, Fort Meade, Maryland.

132.	Barland, Gordon H.; Honts, Charles R., and Barger, Steven D. Studies of the accuracy of security screening polygraph examinations. 1989 Mar 24.Rec #: 569Keywords: validity/ screening-securityCall Number: ODS, P 569, Library 327.12 B24sNotes: Department of Defense Polygraph Institute, DODPI-89-P-0001Abstract: warehouse

133.	Barnes, Philip G. Should the polygraph be used to periodically screen all members of a police department. 1961 May 2217 p.Rec #: 583Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 583Notes: Unpublished manuscript, prepared for the 67th Session of the FBI National Academy

134.	Bartlett, Steven K. Law enforcement applicant polygraph screening. 1995 Aug 169 p.Rec #: 9075Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 9075Notes: Presentation at the American Polygraph Association National Training Seminar, Las Vegas, NV

135.	---. Polygraph examinations in Utah, 1979-1983. Utah Polygraph Association Newsletter. 1985(March):3-5.Rec #: 596Keywords: surveys-Utah/ screening-commercial-Utah/ licensing-UtahCall Number: ODS, P 596

136.	---. Standardization of law enforcement polygraph screening. 1991 May26 p.Rec #: 9115Keywords: applications-law enforcement/ standardizationCall Number: ODS, P 9115Notes: Unpublished manuscript

137.	Barton, Michael F. Polygraph as a police pre-employment selection tool. Polygraph. 1974; 3(4):401-411.Rec #: 597Keywords: screening-police-TexasCall Number: Library

138.	---. A study of admissions made during pre-employment polygraph examinations, 1964-1975, and their significance to the business community. Sam Houston State College; 197696 p.Rec #: 598Keywords: screening-commercial-Texas/ surveys-screening/ surveys-commercial/ dissertations and thesesCall Number: ODS, P 598Notes: Unpublished Master's thesis

139.	Bates, Norman D. Understanding the liability of negligent hiring. Security Management. 1990; 34(7):7A-10A.Rec #: 6315Keywords: employee screening/ background investigations/ paper and pencil tests/ Honesty testing/ drug screening/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6315, 9903

140.	Beach, Bennett H. Blood, sweat and fears. Time. 1980; 116(September 8):44.Rec #: 619Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 619

141.	Beason, George M. and Belt, John A. Verifying applicants's backgrounds. Personnel Journal. 1976; 55:345-348.Rec #: 623Keywords: screening-commercial-applicantsCall Number: ODS, P 623

142.	---. Verifying job applicants' backgrounds. Personnel Administrator. 1974; 19(8):29-32.Rec #: 622Keywords: screening-commercial-applicantsCall Number: ODS, P 622

143.	Belt, John A. The polygraph: A questionable personnel tool. Personnel Administrator. 1983(August):65-66, 68-69, 91.Rec #: 637Keywords: screening-commercial-applicantsCall Number: ODS, P 637

144.	Belt, John A. and Holden, Peter B. Polygraph usage among major U.S. corporations. Personnel Journal. 1978; 57(2):80-86.Rec #: 638Keywords: screening-commercial-major corporations/ applications-corporate useCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 7, 222-232.

145.	Ben-Shakhar, Gershon. Non-conventional methods in personnel selection . In : Harriot, Peter, Ed. Handbook of assessement in organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1988; p. -. Rec #: 654Keywords: applications-screening/ IsraelCall Number: ODS, P 654

146.	Ben-Shakhar, Gershon and Furedy, John J. Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1990.Rec #: 659Keywords: research/ Israel/ Canada/ techniques-control question test/ techniques-guilty knowledge test/ applications-screening/ validity/ reliability/ bibliographies-general/ theory/ polygraph-generalCall Number: Library 363.254 B43t

147.	Ben-Shakhar, Gershon; Lieblich, Israel, and Bar-Hillel, Maya. An evaluation of polygraphers' judgments: A review from a decision theoretic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1982; 67(6):701-713.Rec #: 669Keywords: theory/ test data analysis/ control question tests/ applications-screening/ validity/ research-test data analysis-field/ IsraelCall Number: ODS, P 669, Library

148.	Benson, Philip G. and Krois, Paul S. The polygraph in employment: Some unresolved issues. Personnel Journal. 1979; 58:616-621.Rec #: 672Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ psychological stress evaluator/ screening-periodic/ screening-investigations/ privacy/ legal status/ legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ criticism/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 672

149.	Bergmann, Thomas J.; Mundt, Daniel H., and Illgen, Elizabeth J. The evolution of honesty tests and means for their evaluation. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal . 1990; 3(3 ):215-223. ISSN: 0892-7545.Rec #: 9229Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ integrity tests/ screening-commercial/ privacy/ honesty testing/ honesty testing-legal issues/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 9229Abstract: Paper-and-pencil testing may be the most widely used method of employee honesty assessment. This technique, though, must be improved before it will be more widely accepted. Scoring must be reevaluated, validation standards must be further refined, additional research is needed regarding the accuracy of the tests, and future legal challenges probably will have to be met with respect to such testing relative to privacy, discrimination, and union busting.

150.	Bernstein, I. H. Measuring honesty. Security Management. 1982; 26(1, January):41-45, 47.Rec #: 7792Keywords: applications-preemployment/ applications-personality tests/ polygraph/ techniquesCall Number: ODS, P 7792Abstract: Straightforward questions about an applicant's honesty in past jobs is one of the least expensive methods for testing an applicant's honesty. The initial development of a polygraphy test, which is most effective when oriented toward the particular company's environment, is the most expensive aspect. The primary problem with these direct-method tests is that they can be easily faked. Polygraphing, which is basically a tool for detecting liars, is the most expensive testing method on a per person basis. The following are suggested as steps for reducing problems in typical polygraph tests where a large number of people are asked the same question: (1) tape the question ahead of time so an examiner's inflection cannot bias the respondent; (2) determine which involuntary reactions are the most responsive for each individual during a pretest session; (3) measure the differential response to critical versus neutral questions along the most responsive reaction channels; (4) translate this differential response to a yes-no decision, with a predetermined false alarm rate. The psychological stress evaluation focuses on the vocal tract as a way of detecting lying. The test is limited by its narrow reactive focus and sparse research on its validity. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) constitute an indirect method of honesty detection. The MMPI is best for screening applicants when concern for severe maladjustment is primary, and the CPI is best for measuring interpersonal skills for high visibility jobs. The securing of background data on employees can be helpful in identifying certain problem areas. The pros and cons of the aforementioned methods for measuring honesty are summarized in an exhibit.

151.	Berry, Robert L. and Malinowski, Benjamin F. Lie detection. The Military Police Journal. 1963(August):20-21.Rec #: 702Keywords: history-World War II/ screening-government-World War IICall Number: ODS, P 702

152.	Bierman, Leonard. Polygraph vs. white collar crime. Security Industry & Product News. 1978; 7(6):30.Rec #: 708Keywords: screening-commercial-investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 708

153.	Bird, Kai and Holland, Max. United States: American Legion snitches. The Nation. 1985; 240(1, February 2):105.Rec #: 719Keywords: applications-national security/ screening-federalCall Number: ODS, P 719

154.	Blaylock, Kenneth T.Letter To: All DOD Presidents, NEC National Representatives National Organizers. 1983 Oct 7. 3.Rec #: 6636Keywords: criticism/ screening-Department of Defense/ screening-federal/ screening-federal-DoD/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6636Notes: on polygraph

155.	Bledsoe, Anthony H. The lie detector and national defense. Police and Peace Officers' Journal of California. 1941; February:12.Rec #: 732Keywords: screening-government/ historical interest-screening/ applications-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 732

156.	Blinkhorn, Stephen; Bull, Ray; Carroll, Douglas, and Cunningham, Cyril. Report of the working group on the use of the polygraph in criminal investigation and personnel screening. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society. 1986; 39(March):81-94.Rec #: 735Keywords: polygraph-general-Great Britain/ screening-commercial/ research-review/ criticism-validity/ criminal investigations/ employee screening/ techniques-CQT/ techniques-GKTCall Number: ODS, P 735Abstract: Presents the report of the UK's Working Group on the use of the polygraph in criminal investigations and employment screening. Practices in other countries are surveyed, and the polygraph method is compared with other ways of identifying guilty individuals and investigating criminality. The issue of bias is analyzed, and the merits and disadvantages of the control-question and guilty-knowledge methods are outlined. Overall the report concludes that polygraph tests are well established in several countries and are generally used in criminal and forensic investigations, security-clearance screening, and preemployment evaluations. Procedures used in polygraph examinations are not standardized and there is no simple method of checking on the practices of individual polygraphers. The use of polygraph tests in commercial settings is not endorsed. Use in preemployment is recommended only if consent and participation are truly voluntary. Polygraphic methods must be introduced against a background of general cultural and societal norms and accepted business practices.

157.	Blocklyn, Paul L. Pre-employment testing. Personnel. 1988(February):66-67.Rec #: 742Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ paper and pencil tests/ screening-psychological/ screening-aidsCall Number: ODS, P 742

158.	Blum, Richard H. The polygraph examination in law enforcement personnel selection. Police. 1967; 12(2):60-75.Rec #: 746Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 746

159.	Blum, Richard H. and Osterloh, William. The polygraph examination as a means for detecting truth and falsehood in stories presented by police informants. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 1968; 59(1):133-137.Rec #: 747Keywords: screening-police informantsCall Number: ODS, P 747

160.	Bohardt, Paul H. Tucson uses new police personnel selection methods. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 1959; 28(September):8-12.Rec #: 755Keywords: screening-police-Tucson/ Tucson Police DepartmentCall Number: ODS, P 755, 9904

161.	Boyce, Christopher J. Statement of Christopher J. Boyce. Hearings before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, on U.S. Government Personnel Security Program; 1985 AprWashington, DC: GPO11 p.Rec #: 787Keywords: screening-counterintelligence/ applications-counterintelligence/ cases-espionage/ Central Intelligence AgencyCall Number: ODS, P 787, LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, (14)2, 128-238

162.	Boyd, David A. The effect of quality control on counterintelligence and personnel security polygraph testing. Joint Military Intelligence College; 1995138 p.Rec #: 9178Keywords: screening-federal/ quality control/ countermeasuresCall Number: Library, 327.12 B69eNotes: Unpublished Master's thesis

163.	Bradshaw, Jane W. Employer uses of polygraph. Polygraph. 1982; 11(2):159-184.Rec #: 810Keywords: screening-commercial/ National Labor Relations Act/ Civil Rights Act/ admissibility-stipulatedCall Number: ODS, P 810, LibraryAbstract: Employee misconduct has become a major concern of public and private employers in recent years, as employee crimes against property have been estimated to cost between $12 billion and $40 billion annually. Examination of recent cases and relevant laws indicates that employers may request that a prospective employee submit to and successfully take a polygraph examination as a condition of employment. However, if the employers' use of the polygraph examination has a disproportionately adverse impact on members of a protected group, such use violates Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Futhermore, employers violate the National Labor Relations Act if they use the polygraph to inquire into the applicant's union sympathies. Employers may require an employee to submit to a polygraph examination when the employee is the subject of specific evidence indication misconduct in employment or when the employers' use of the examination represents a bargained-for condition of employment. Generally, when employers have a lawful motive to use the polygraph examination, the employee's refusal to take the examination constitutes cause for discharge within the meaning of Section 10 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act. Many courts allow polygraph evidence to be used only if there has been a prior stipulation to such use by both parties. A total of 108 footnote references are proveded. (Author summary modified)

164.	Braxton, Mary C. Statement of Mary C. Braxton. Hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources; United States Senate, 99th Congress, 2nd Session, on S. 1815, Polygraph Protection Act of 1985; 1986 Apr 23Washington, D. C.: GPO; 1986: 87-91. Rec #: 9732Keywords: preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 9732

165.	Brazel, Christy. Taking a polygraph test. AFCW Action. 1986(May-June):18.Rec #: 7125Keywords: preemployment screening/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P 7125

166.	Brenner, Marie. American Nightmare: the ballad of Richard Jewell. Vanity Fair. 1997(February):100-165.Rec #: 7014Keywords: screening/ bombing suspect/ FBICall Number: ODS, P 7014

167.	Brisentine, Sharon. A study on the polygraph testing and clearance decisions of cases involving illegal drug use. 1984 Nov12.Rec #: 9736Keywords: security screening/ cases-drugsCall Number: ODS, P 9736

168.	Brobst, Karen E. and Brock, Randolph D., III. A winning combination. Security Management. 1987; 3(3, March):79-87.Rec #: 847Keywords: research-paper and pencil tests/ paper and pencil tests/ screening-commercial/ reliability-generalCall Number: ODS, P 847

169.	Brock, Randolph D., III. Politicians and the polygraph: Is pre-election screening as absurd as it sounds? 19762 p.Rec #: 849Keywords: applications-political candidatesCall Number: ODS, P 849Notes: Unpublished manuscript

170.	Brooks, Jack. Polygraph testing: Thoughts of a skeptical legislator. American Psychologist. 1985; 40(3):348-354. ISSN: 0003-066x.Rec #: 852Keywords: legislation-federal/ screening-federal/ applications-national security/ criticism-generalCall Number: ODS, P 852Abstract: The federal government, under the leadership of the Reagan administration, is expanding the use ofo polygraph tests for screening and investigative purposes. This artical reviews the history of debate within the government over the use of the polygraph, and it describes legislation that must be enacted to control the proliferation of unwarranted and inaccurate polygraph use.

171.	---. Statement of Congressman Jack Brooks. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Civil Service of the House Committee on the Post Office and Civil Service, on H.R. 4681 Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Feb 29.Rec #: 851Keywords: legislation-federal-counterintelligence/ applications-national security/ screening-DoD-counterintelligence screeningCall Number: ODS, P 851

172.	Brown, Abby. Employment tests: Issues without clear answers. Personnel Administrator. 1985; 30(9, September):43-56.Rec #: 854Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-EEOC/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 854

173.	Brownman, Harold L. Testimony of Harold L. Brownman, Deputy Director for Management and Service, Central Intelligence Agency. Hearing before the Foreign Operations and Government Information Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations Washington, DC: GPO; 1974 Jun 5.Rec #: 860Keywords: Central Intelligence Agency/ screening-CIA/ applications-counterintelligence/ research-CIACall Number: ODS, P 860

174.	Buckley, Joseph P. (John E. Reid and Associates, Inc.). Letter To: Richard H. Bolt. Chicago, Illinois; 1986 Jun 16. 14.Rec #: 9738Keywords: security screening/ counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 9738

175.	---. Guideline for the proper use of the polygraph technique by the employer.Rec #: 809Keywords: preemployment screening/ Accuracy/ John E. Reid & Associates/ applications-general/ drug use/ pretest interview/ GSRCall Number: ODS, P 809

176.	---. Honestly, it's the truth. Security Management. 1986(June):1-6.Rec #: 883Keywords: surveys/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-investigations/ utility-screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 883

177.	---. Interviewing for integrity: A presentation on job applicants for positions of trust. 1988 Aug 16.Rec #: 870Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ integrity testsCall Number: ODS, P 870Notes: Paper presented at the annual seminar of the American Polygraph Association, Miami Beach, FL

178.	---. Nobody's perfect. Security Management. 1987; 31(5):77-82.Rec #: 890Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 890

179.	---. Polygraph testing: The pros and cons. Management Review. 1986(January):59-61.Rec #: 885Keywords: screening-preemployment/ screening-investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 885

180.	---. Polygraphs in the workplace. Small Business Report. 1988; 6:July.Rec #: 868Keywords: American Polygraph Association/ screening-commercial/ ethicsCall Number: ODS, P 868

181.	---. The use of the polygraph in the workplace. Polygraph. 1988; 17(2):80-90.Rec #: 897Keywords: applications/ false positives/ false negatives/ American Polygraph Association policy/ licensing-states/ limiting-states/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-investigations/ validity/ OTA reportCall Number: Library

182.	---. The use of the polygraph in the workplace: The American Polygraph Association's view. Employment Testing. 1987; 1(20, December):4-5.Rec #: 894Keywords: screening-commercial-protection for subjects/ American Polygraph Association policyCall Number: ODS, P 894

183.	---. The use of the polygraph in the workplace: The American Polygraph Association's view. 1987 Jun 26.Rec #: 895Keywords: screening-commercial/ false positives/ false negatives/ licensing-states/ limiting-states/ admissibility/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-investigations/ validity/ American Polygraph Association/ Office of Technology ReportCall Number: ODS, P 895Notes: Paper presented at the Privacy Claims in the Workplace Conference, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC

184.	Buckley, Joseph P., III and Senese, Louis C. The influence of race and gender on preemployment polygraph examination results. Polygraph. 1991; 20(4):238-246.Rec #: 900Keywords: screening-preemployment/ race/ genderCall Number: Library

185.	Budiansky, Stephen. Some truths about lie detectors. The Atlantic Monthly. 1984; 28:31-32, 34-35.Rec #: 903Keywords: screening-government/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P 903

186.	Budman, Matthew. The honesty business. Across the Board. 1993; 30(9, November/December):34-37. ISSN: 0147-1554.Rec #: 9237Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ honesty tests/ screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 9237Abstract: Paper-and-pencil honesty testing has gained a foothold in hiring policies, but complaints and concerns linger.

187.	Bureaucracy: What is Truth? Newsweek. 1964(December 7):27.Rec #: 924Keywords: screening/ Possony/ Stanford University Hoover Institution/ uneasiness/ CIA/ sexual perverts/ communist sympathizersCall Number: ODS, P 924

188.	Burkey, Lee M. Lie detectors in industrial relations. Continuing Legal Education. 1963; 1(2):107-118.Rec #: 928Keywords: screening-commercial-labor/ law-arbitration-Illinois/ law-laborCall Number: ODS, P 928

189.	---. Lie detectors in labor relations. Arbitration Journal. 1964; 19:193.Rec #: 929Keywords: screening-commercial/ labor relationsCall Number: ODS, P 929

190.	---. Privacy, property and the polygraph. Labor Law Journal. 1967; 18:79-89.Rec #: 931Keywords: screening-commercial/ examiners-competence/ ethics-examiners/ privacy rights/ historyCall Number: ODS, P 931

191.	Business buys the lie detector. Business Week. 1978(February 6):100-101, 104.Rec #: 950Keywords: screening-commercial/ voice stress analysis/ surveys-businessCall Number: ODS, P 950

192.	Business uses the lie detector. Business Week. 1960(June 18):98, 105-106.Rec #: 952Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 952

193.	Cahill, William. Lie detector finds daily use testing honesty of employees. Chicago Journal of Commerce. 1950(October 5).Rec #: 962Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 962

194.	Call, Barbara J. Polygraph regulations: A trend toward tougher standards. Employee Relations Law Journal. 1986; 11:585-603.Rec #: 969Keywords: EEOC/ law-suits-employees/ regulations/ law-state/ screening-commercial-law/ law-labor-NLRBCall Number: ODS, P 969

195.	Can you get into trouble by asking workers to submit to a lie detector test? Protection Management. 1978(2174, March 15):2-3.Rec #: 984Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-employment/ law-employee rightsCall Number: ODS, P 984

196.	Canty, Henry L. Testimony of Henry L. Canty. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Post Office and Civil Service, on H.R. 4681, Federal Polygraph Limitations and Anti-Censorship Act of 1984 Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Feb 29.Rec #: 998Keywords: legislation-federal-counterintelligence/ screening-federal-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 998

197.	Capps, Michael H. Can we still pick out the bad apples? Security Management. 1989(June):126, 128.Rec #: 1000Keywords: screening-commercial/ EPPA/ paper and pencil tests/ reference check/ background check/ drug testing/ security interviewCall Number: ODS, P 1000

198.	Carlyle-Gordge, Peter. Truth shall not be free: Proposal to outlaw use of polygraph and voice stress analysis in job interviews. Macleans. 1979; 92(April 23):27.Rec #: 1028Keywords: legislation-federal/ voice stress analysis/ screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 1028

199.	Carroll, Douglas. Testimony before the House of Commons Employment Committee, 1983-84 Session. In. The implications for industrial relations and employment of the introduction of the polygraph. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1984 Jun 20; pp. 55-139. Rec #: 1037Keywords: techniques-compared/ validity/ screening-commercial/ Great Britain/ screening-national security/ ethics/ examiners-trainingCall Number: Library, 331.0941 G79i

200.	Central Intelligence Agency. Letter to Bella S. Abzug. APA Newsletter. 1976(March/April):3-5.Rec #: 1061Keywords: screening-CIA/ legislation-federal/ reliability-general/ applications-counterintelligence/ Central Intelligence AgencyCall Number: Library

201.	Chamberlin, Charles S. The polygraph, while not foolproof, can serve as a useful adjunct tool in employee screening. Security World. 1985; 22(8):22.Rec #: 1064Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 1064

202.	Chambers, Ray W. An argument against anti-polygraph legislation. Security Management. 1977(July):21-24.Rec #: 1066Keywords: legislation-federal/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 1066

203.	Chatham, Russell B. The polygraphic truth test: Further developments, recent legislation in New York. Tennessee Law Review. 1953; 22:916-918.Rec #: 1078Keywords: legislation-New York/ applications-counterintelligence/ historical interest-law/ applications-national security/ test data analysis-inconclusive/ screening-federal-Atomic Energy CommissionCall Number: ODS, P 1078

204.	---. Public employee screening. In: Ansley, Norman and Weir, Raymond J., Jr., Eds. Selected papers on the polygraph. Washington, DC: Board of Polygraph Examiners; 1956; pp. 86-89. Rec #: 1079Keywords: screening-federal-Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge, TN/ cases-sabotage-Cuba/ surveys-examiners/ historical interest-screening/ Atomic Energy Commission/ ethics/ trainingCall Number: ODS, P 245

205.	Chocolate chips - yes! Barbed wire - no! Unions use of the polygraph. APA Newsletter. 1977; 5(September/October):7.Rec #: 1088Keywords: screening-commercial-bakery/ cases-industrial sabotage/ law-laborCall Number: Library

206.	Clark, Alma Ann McArthur. Employee theft and methods of deterrence; 1984 Aug.Rec #: 1105Keywords: dissertations and theses/ applications-commercial/ cases-theft/ screening-commercial/ background investigations/ paper and pencil tests/ graphology/ surveys-retail stores/ surveys-specialty storesCall Number: ODS, P 1105Notes: Doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman's University

207.	Cobb, Jean; Brooks, Jack; Safire, William; Lykken, David T.; Wilson, George C.; Saxe, Leonard; Edwards, Don; Young, C. W.; Boyce, Christopher J.; Levchenko, Stanislav; Inman, Bobby; Stilwell, Richard G., and Ansley, Norman. To tell the truth: Do national security concerns warrant the expanded use of polygraphs by federal government? Common Cause Magazine. 1985(September/October):33-37.Rec #: 1124Keywords: screening-federal-counterintelligence/ applications-counterintelligence/ criticism-validity/ cases-espionageCall Number: ODS, P 1124

208.	Cochetti, Philip M. and Gordon, Nathan J. The effectiveness of polygraph in the personnel selection process. nd. Philadelphia, PA. 33.Rec #: 9749Keywords: screening/ pretest interview/ preemployment screening/ background investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 9749

209.	Coffey, Kenneth J., Associate Director National Security and International Affairs Division. Statement of Dr. Kenneth J. Coffey. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Legislation and National Security House Committee on Government Operations; 1983 Oct 19; Washington, D. C. 19837.Rec #: 9750Keywords: security screeningCall Number: ODS, P 9750

210.	Coghill, Mary Ann. The lie detector in employment: An examination of some of the problems. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Industrial and Labor Relations Library; 1968 Jul.Rec #: 1129Keywords: screening-commercial-labor/ criticism-laborCall Number: ODS, P 1129

211.	Cole, William L. Statement of William L. Cole, on behalf of Borg-Warner Corporation. Hearing before the Employment Opportunities Subcommittee of the Committee on Education and Labor, U.S. House of Representatives, on Polygraph Tests in the Workplace Washington, DC: GPO; 1985 Jul 30.Rec #: 1139Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-commercial/ cases-commercialCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 14, 252-255.

212.	Commission to review the DoD security policies and practices. Keeping the nation's secrets: A report to the Secretary of Defense. 1985114 p.Rec #: 1151Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ screening-federal-counterintelligence/ Stilwell Commission/ Department of DefenseCall Number: Library, 353.0071 Un3k

213.	Confessions of a polygraph examiner. Corporate Security. 1982(April):2-3 & 6.Rec #: 1162Keywords: screening-commercial/ cases-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 1162

214.	Congress told lie detectors are needed by stores. Crime Control Digest. 1977; 11(46, November 21):6.Rec #: 1168Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 1168

215.	Control questions approved by U. S. Court of Appeals. APA Newsletter. 1986; 19(1):11.Rec #: 1179Keywords: law-Constitutional-control question tests/ question formulation-control question tests/ screening-city-firemen/ control question tests/ law-federal court decisionCall Number: Library

216.	Coors Industries polygraph survey. APA Newsletter. 1980; 13(2):2-5.Rec #: 1187Keywords: surveys-Coors/ screening-commercial/ Coors IndustriesCall Number: Library

217.	Cormack, Robert W. The police candidate polygraph examination program of John E. Reid and Associates. 1963 Sep.Rec #: 1197Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 1197Notes: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners, Chicago, IL

218.	Corporate lie detectors come under fire. Business Week. 1973(January 13):88, 90.Rec #: 1200Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism/ industrial espionage/ alcoholism/ drug use/ voice tremors/ pulse/ blood pressure/ perspiration/ MMPI/ physical responses/ applications-drug testingCall Number: ODS, P 1200

219.	Correa, Eileen J. and Adams, Henry E. The validity of the pre-employment polygraph examination and the effects of motivation. Polygraph. 1981; 10(3):143-155.Rec #: 1202Keywords: screening-preemployment/ validity/ pneumo/ motivationCall Number: LibraryAbstract: Subjects were 40 research participants (20 male, 20 females), undergraduates from the University of Georgia. Five females and five males were randomly assigned to each of four groups: Lying-Motivated, Lying-Unmotivated, Truthful-Motivated, Truthful-Unmotivated. Validity of experimenter B's subjective ratings of polygraph records as overall Truthful or Lying was 100%, significantly more accurate than chance (p < .01); validity of experimenter B's subjective identifications of individual lie items ranged from 68% to 100%. Objectively, lying responses were characterized by significantly larger increases in conductance for SRL and larger decreases in heart rate than truthful responses; motivation had no overall main effect but interacted with other independent variables on several physiological measures. Results were discussed in light of previous research.

220.	Cowden, Gary W. Preemployment screening: Is polygraph the answer? Security Management. 1988; 32(80, March):80,82-84.Rec #: 1211Keywords: screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 1211

221.	Crenshaw, John R. Management's use of polygraph examinations. Employer-Employee Relations. 1981; 12(6, Novermber-December):1.Rec #: 1218Keywords: law-labor/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 1218

222.	Criscuoli, E. J., Jr. Statement of the American Society for Industrial Security concerning the Polygraph Protection Act of 1985. Polygraph. 1986; 15(1):69-77.Rec #: 1226Keywords: screening-commercial-investigations/ cases-commercial/ surveys-employees/ legislation-federal-commercial/ EPPACall Number: LibraryNotes: Also printed in Security Management, p. 63-67

223.	Crowley, Carolyn H. The truth about polygraph . Security Management. 1982; 26(12, December):29-35.Rec #: 1237Keywords: psychophysiology-polygraph theory/ applications-screening/ validity/ computerized polygraphCall Number: ODS, P 1237Abstract: The polygraph measures a person's respiration, blood pressure, and perspiration. Its premise is that lying will involuntarily and inevitably lead to a quickening of the monitored physical processes. The use of the polygraph is expanding. Polygraphers regularly test individuals in such agencies as the FBI and the CIA. Polygraph examinations are cheaper and quicker than background investigations for job applicants, and many employers now use the polygraph for this reason. Approximately 6,000 polygraphers practice in the United States, administering an estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 tests each year. The standard polygraph format is the Control Question Test. Questions are asked in a monotone, sometimes so softly that the examinee must strain to hear. Despite efforts to defend its use, controversy still surrounds the use of the polygraph in criminal trials. No state freely admits polygraph evidence in criminal cases, although about 25 do when both the prosecuting and defense attorneys agree before the testing. The American Polygraph Association cites studies indicating that polygraph accuracy rates range from 87.2 percent to 96.2 percent. Radical advances in instrumentation are not anticipated. However, refinements, such as computer analysis of polygraph charts, will probably play an increasing role in future polygraph procedures. One photograph is included.

224.	Curtis, Sargeant J. The value of the lie detector to business and industry. In : Ansley, Norman and Weir, Raymond J., Jr. Eds. Selected papers on the polygraph. Washington, DC: Board of Polygraph Examiners; 1956; pp. 83-86. Rec #: 1246Keywords: screening-commercial/ cases-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 245

225.	Dallas Police Department. Pre-employment polygraph booklet. Dallas, TX: Dallas Police Department; nd.Rec #: 9659Keywords: screening-law enforcementCall Number: ODS, P 9659

226.	Darden, Buddy. Testimony of the Honorable Buddy Darden of Georgia. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities, Committee on Education and Labor, U.S. Congress Washington, DC: GPO; 1987 Mar 5.Rec #: 1284Keywords: screening-commercial/ legislation-federal-commercialCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in APA Newsletter, 20(2), 5-7.

227.	Davis, John R. Combating theft from within: What is the answer? Police. 1965; 9(3):66-68.Rec #: 1307Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 1307

228.	---. The use of the polygraph in private industry. Police. 1960; 5(1):44-46.Rec #: 1308Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-periodicCall Number: ODS, P 1308

229.	Davis, Mendel J. Remarks of Congressman Mendel J. Davis on behalf of the American Polygraph Association. Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 95th Congress, 2nd Session Washington, DC: GPO; 1978 Sep 19.Rec #: 1310Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ American Polygraph Association/ admissibilityCall Number: ODS, P 1310

230.	---. Statement of Congressman Mendel J. Davis. Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, on S. 1845, Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection ActWashington, DC: GPO; 1978 Sep 19: 356-391. Rec #: 5322Keywords: screening-commercial/ validity/ reliability-general/ admissibility/ licensing/ American Polygraph Association/ law-labor-privacy/ cases-general/ Davis, Mendel J./ Fochtman, John/ Barland, Gordon H./ Orne, Martin T./ Horvath, FrankCall Number: Library, 342.73 Un3Notes: Presented by John Fochtman, Executive Director, American Polygraph Association; Gordon H. Barland, Ph.D., President, Polygraph Screening Service, Salt Lake City, Utah; Martin T. Orne, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Pennsylvania;=and Frank Horvath, Ph.D., School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

231.	Davis, Walter; Bayh, Birch; Smith, Robert E., and Linowes, David. No more lie detector test. Retail Clerks Advocate. 1978; 81(1, February-March):18-22.Rec #: 1314Keywords: screening-commercial-retail/ criticism-privacy/ voice stress analysis/ PSE/ legislation-federal-screening/ law-laborCall Number: ODS, P 1314Abstract: Article includes comments by each of the authors concerning legislation to prohibts lie detector tests in employment.

232.	Days Inn of America, IncorporatedLetter To: Employment Committee, House of Commons Session 1984-1985. Atlanta, GA; 1985. 2 p.Rec #: 1324Keywords: screening-commercial-utilityCall Number: Library, 331.0941 G79iNotes: Memoranda laid before the Committee, p. 16-17

233.	Defense Department officials took polygraph tests during investigation. APA Newsletter. 1982; 15(1):9.Rec #: 1351Keywords: cases-national security/ screening-governmentCall Number: Library

234.	Denver Career Service Authority, Research Division. The polygraph as a pre-employment selection device. 1972 Jun.Rec #: 1370Keywords: screening-police-Denver/ Denver Police DepartmentCall Number: ODS, P 1370Notes: Unpublished manuscript, 26 p.

235.	Department of Defense. Department of Defense Polygraph Program: Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1986. 1987.Rec #: 1375Keywords: surveys-statistical/ bibliographies/ biographies-Barland, Gordon H./ research-Department of Defense/ screening-Department of Defense/ applications-counterintelligence/ cases-counterintelligence/ Department of DefenseCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 16, 53-71.Abstract: A review of fiscal year 1986 polygraph test program results covers the number and purpose of examinations conducted, results of examinations, and uses of examination results. In analyzing the utility of the counterintelligence polygraph, the report presents various categories of anecdotal accounts of polygraph interviews which produced data of vital security importance not otherwise obtainable. The report also presents results from a periodic counterintelligence-scope examinations and discusses the polygraph's use in personnel security, the positive collection effort against U.S. intelligence, counterespionage operations, damage assesment following espionage convictions, and the polygraph's deterrent value. Other issues addressed in the report are polygraph program expansion, polygraph training, polygraph research, and difficulties in program expansion.

236.	--. Department of Defense Polygraph Program: Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 1987. 1988.Rec #: 1378Keywords: surveys-statistical/ research-Department of Defense/ screening-Department of Defense/ applications-counterintelligence/ cases-criminal/ cases-counterintelligence/ Department of DefenseCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 17(2), 56-79.

237.	--. Personnel security program; 1987 Jan; DOD Regulation 5200.2-R. Rec #: 6638Keywords: security programs/ CSP/ applications-screening/ application-federal governmentCall Number: ODS, P 6638

238.	Department of Defense Regulation Number 5210.48-R. DoD Polygraph Program. Washington, DC: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Policy; 1985 Jan.Rec #: 1373Keywords: regulations-Department of Defense/ screening-Department of Defense/ applications-counterintelligence/ examiners-training/ examiners-selection/ instruments-Department of Defense/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 1373, LibraryNotes: Republished in Polygraph Law Review, 8.

239.	Department of Justice defends limited use of polygraph. American Bar Association Law and National Security Intelligence Report. 1983; 5(12):1, 2, 6-8.Rec #: 1380Keywords: screening-government/ applications-national security/ validityCall Number: Library

240.	Devine, David. Benefits derived from corporate polygraph program. Jack Eckerd Drug Company memorandum; 1978 Jan 253 p.Rec #: 1421Keywords: screening-commercial-drug industry/ surveys-pharmaciesCall Number: ODS, P 1421

241.	Devine, David and Bayh, Birch. Polygraphs: Should they be used in business? Drug Topics. 1980; 124(23, December 12):12-16.Rec #: 1422Keywords: screening-commercial-drug industryCall Number: ODS, P 1422

242.	Devitt, Mary K.; Honts, Charles R., and Vondergeest, Lynelle. Truth or just bias: The treatment of the psychophysiological detection of deception in introductory psychology textbooks. The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology. 1997; 1(1):9-32.Rec #: 7028Keywords: detection of deception/ preemployment screening/ security clearanceCall Number: ODS, P 7028

243.	Dickson, Billy. Pre-employment polygraph screening of police applicants. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 1986; 55(4, April):7-9. ISSN: 0014-5688.Rec #: 1428Keywords: screening-police/ Florida/ surveys/ quality controlCall Number: ODS, P 1428

244.	Dishlacoff, Leon and Shaugnessy, R. B. Police Applicant polygraph program. 1964; Unpublished report to Denver Civil Service Commission. Rec #: 1444Keywords: screening-police/ Denver Police DepartmentCall Number: ODS, P 1444

245.	Duggar, Robert. Passing the pre-employment lie detector test.: Command Publications.; 1984. Rec #: 1487Keywords: countermeasures/ screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 1487

246.	Dumaine, Brian. The new art of hiring smart. Fortune. 1987; 116(4):78-81.Rec #: 1491Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 1491

247.	Dunn, Donald H. When a lie detector is part of the job interview. Business Week. 1981(July 27):85-86.Rec #: 1495Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 1495

248.	Edel, Eugene C. and Jacoby, Jacob. Examiner reliability in polygraph chart analysis: Identification of physiological responses. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1975; 60(5, October):632-634.Rec #: 1507Keywords: examiner reliability/ test data analysis/ screening-national security/ physiological responsesCall Number: ODS, P 1507

249.	Edel, Eugene C. and Moore, L. A., Jr. Analysis of agreement in polygraph charts. Polygraph. 1984; 13(2):193-197.Rec #: 1508Keywords: reliability/ test data analysis/ screening-national security/ research-test data analysis-fieldCall Number: Library

250.	Edwards, DonLetter To: The Honorable Caspar Weinberger, Secretary Department of Defense. 1982 Nov 29.Rec #: 1511Keywords: legislation-federal/ screening-Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 1511Abstract:

251.	---. Polygraph examinations. Congressional Record. 1983(May 17):E2323-2324.Rec #: 1512Keywords: screening-government/ criticism/ applications-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 1512, Library Notes: Reprinted in APA Newsletter (1983, May/June).

252.	Elam, Gerald. Polygraph: An aid in recruiting. Law and Order. 1960; 8(7, July):24, 26-27.Rec #: 1571Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 1571

253.	Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988: Law and explanation. Chicago, IL: Commerce Clearing House; 1988.Rec #: 1592Keywords: Employee Polygraph Protection Act/ law-federal-screening-commercial/ law-limiting/ law-labor-rights/ law-EPPACall Number: ODS, P 1592

254.	Ennis, Daniel R. The effect of a pre-polygraph briefing on polygraph outcome. 1986 Jul 31.Rec #: 6712Keywords: screening/ counterintelligence/ security screening/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 6712

255.	Ertel, Chris. Science or scapegoat? The debate over polygraph testing. CSG Backgrounder. 1987(April):18 .Rec #: 1604Keywords: validity/ law-licensing-state/ law-limiting-state/ criticism/ legislation-federal/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-theft/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 1604Notes: [Council of State Governments]

256.	FBI statement before Foreign Operations and Government Information Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Operations. 1974 Jun 5.Rec #: 1688Keywords: law/ screening-FBI/ applications-federal/ surveys/ Federal Bureau of InvestigationCall Number: ODS, P 1688

257.	Fedor, William. Speech on DoD use of the polygraph presented to the Standing Committee on Law and National Security, American Bar Association. 1983 Dec 2:-.Rec #: 1702Keywords: screening-federal/ applications-counterintelligence/ cases-espionage/ surveysCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph (1983), 12(4), 333-340.Abstract: The DOD protects the country's sensitive resources through physical, information, and personnel security. The keystone topersonnel security has been the field investigation, but budget cuts an limitations placed on records access since the mid-1970's have severely limited the DOD's capabilities in this area. At the same time, espionage has been on the upswing. Due to the worsening situation, a panel of representatives from themilitary services and mililtary intelligence agencies was charged with reviewing the DOD personnel security program in 1982. It recommended tighter controls on issuing clearances, improved adjudication of security cases, reinstitution of periodic reinvestigations of employees, and a counterintelligence scope polygraph examination to help determine the eligibility of a limited number of individuals in positions requiring access to extremely sensitive classified information. This meant no lifestyle questions, but questions relating strictly to espionage activities. The DOD recognizes that the polygraph is not infallible and is dependent on the examiner's quality and professionalism. Consequently, the DOD relies on other sources of information and has stringent standards for its examiners. In addition, experiences of the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency for over 30 years have demonstrated the polygraph's usefulness in indentifying applicants who clearly are unsuitable for assignment to these agencies. The proposed change in DOD policy that certain adverse consequences may follow an individual's refusal to take a polygraph examination has drawn considerable attention. All these actions, however, are appealable, and they do not include termination of employment. Several safeguards also have been incorporated into the proposed policy to protect the rights of individuals.

258.	Ferguson, Robert J., Jr. and Gugas, Chris. Pre-employment polygraphy. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 1985. Rec #: 1726Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: Library 658.3112 F38p

259.	Five Guidelines On Integrity Tests. Security . 1995; 32(4):65.Rec #: 9283Keywords: employee screening/ Psychological TestingCall Number: ODS, P 9283

260.	Flanagan, Susan M. Employer-employee relations - The Employee Polygraph Protection Act: Eliminating polygraph testing in private employment is not the answer. Southern Illinois University Law Journal. 1987; 11:355-380.Rec #: 1762Keywords: law-employment/ screening-commercial/ legislation-federal-commercial/ licensing/ EPPACall Number: ODS, P 1762

261.	Fletcher, C. H. Three systems which protect both personnel and management. Bankers Monthly. 1949; 66(February):30, 32, 34. ISSN: 0005-5476.Rec #: 1767Keywords: screening-commercial-bankingCall Number: ODS, P 1767

262.	Fochtman, John. Remarks by John Fochtman on behalf of The American Polygraph Association and the American Association of Police Polygraphists. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations of the Committee on Education and labor, U.S. House of Representatives, 96th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC: GPO; 1979 Dec 15.Rec #: 1777Keywords: screening-commercial/ legislation-federal-commercialCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in APA Newsletter, 15(6), 7-8.

263.	Focus - spy catchers: (Analysis of spy case - Aldrich Ames). MacNeil/Lehrer Newshour. 1994(March 1).Rec #: 6488Keywords: screening-CIA/ counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 6488Notes: Transcript of show #4874Abstract: on file

264.	Fox, Dean. Screening police applicants. Polygraph. 1972; 1(2, June):80-83.Rec #: 1797Keywords: screening-police-Kalamazoo/ Kalamazoo Police DepartmentCall Number: Library

265.	Frankel, Edward B. Why I'm a believer in lie detector tests. Medical Economics. 1986; 63(August 11):127.Rec #: 1807Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 1807

266.	French, Marilyn. Oh, all my employees are honest. American Business Magazine. 1951(August):5-8.Rec #: 1816Keywords: cases-theft/ screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 1816, 9903

267.	Fried, Monte. The truth about lie detectors in Maryland. Maryland Bar Journal. 1985; 18(9, November):6-8.Rec #: 1824Keywords: screening-commercial-Maryland/ law-MarylandCall Number: ODS, P 1824

268.	Frosh, S. B. Polygraphs: A balancing of the interests. Polygraph. 1975; 4(4):341-355.Rec #: 1839Keywords: screening-commercial-investigations/ legislation-municipalCall Number: Library

269.	Gale, Anthony, Ed. The Polygraph Test: Lies, Truth and Science. London: Sage Publications, Inc; 1988. Rec #: 1890Keywords: Lykken, David T./ techniques-CQT/ validity/ research-laboratory/ research-field/ countermeasures/ applications-screening/ techniques-GKT/ criticismCall Number: Library 363.254 P76

270.	Gallagher, Cornelius E. Why house hearings on invasion of privacy. American Psychologist. 1965; 20(11):881-882.Rec #: 6308Keywords: screening-government/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P 6308

271.	Gambino, Robert. Testimony of Robert Gambino, Director, Office of Security, Central Intelligence Agency . Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, House of Representatives, 96th Congress, 1st SessionWashington, DC: GPO; 1979 May 16: 30-54. Rec #: 1896Keywords: Central Intelligence Agency/ screening-government/ applications-counterintelligence/ cases-espionageCall Number: Library, 353.0074 Un3p

272.	Gardella, Stephen L. How the combat polygraphist can save lives. The Journal of Polygraph Studies. 1967; 1(5, March/April).Rec #: 7018Keywords: interrogation/ screening/ pretest interviewCall Number: ODS, P 7018

273.	Gardner, Susan. Wiretapping the mind: A call to regulate truth verification in employment. San Diego Law Review. 1984; 21(March):295-324.Rec #: 1914Keywords: screening-commercial-legislation/ legislation-federalCall Number: ODS, P 1914

274.	Garwood, Marcia. Factors influencing polygraph test validity. 1985 Aug 614 p.Rec #: 9058Keywords: screening-validityCall Number: ODS, P 9058Notes: Unpublished manuscript

275.	---. Issues on the validity of personnel screening polygraph examinations. 1985 Aug 6.Rec #: 1922Keywords: screening-validity/ theory-base rateCall Number: ODS, P 1922Notes: Paper presented at the 20th annual seminar of the American Polygraph Association, Reno, NV

276.	---. Question wording in screening for illegal drugs and narcotics. nd4 p.Rec #: 6310Keywords: question formulation/ drugsCall Number: ODS, P 6310Notes: Unpublished manuscript

277.	---. Two issues on the validity of personnel screening polygraph examinations. Polygraph. 1985; 14(3, Sept.):209-216.Rec #: 1921Keywords: validity/ screening/ retestingCall Number: ODS, P 1921, LibraryAbstract: Polygraph examination validity is influenced both by the decisionmaking system of which the polygraph examination is a part and the number of deceptive people in the population. Validity can be increased by retesting subjects and/or using information in addition to polygraph test outcome.

278.	Gastwirth, Joseph L. The statistical precision of medical screening procedures: Applications to polygraph and AIDS antibody test data. Statistical Science. 1987; 2(3):213-238.Rec #: 1923Keywords: conditional probability/ test data analysis/ validity/ base rate/ statistical models/ PVP/ PVNCall Number: ODS, P 1923

279.	Gates, Edgar D. Polygraph examinations for pre-employment screening: A personnel administrator's viewpoint. Polygraph. 1980; 9(1):30-33.Rec #: 1927Keywords: screening-generalCall Number: Library

280.	Gelb, Edward I. Pre-employment screening. SEMA News. 1979(July):4-5.Rec #: 1957Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 1957

281.	Gest, Ted. When employees turn into thieves. U.S. News and World Report. 1983(September 26):79-80.Rec #: 1984Keywords: screening-commercial-theft/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 1984

282.	---. When employers turn to lie detectors. U.S. News and World Report. 1983(April 4):78.Rec #: 1985Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 1985

283.	Goldberg, Lewis R.; Grenier, Julia R.; Guion, Robert M.; Sechrest, Lee B., and Wing, Hilda. Questionnaires used in the prediction of trustworthiness in pre-employment selection decisions: An A.P.A. task force report. American Psychological Association; 1991 Feb40 p.Rec #: 8976Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 8976

284.	Gooch, Charles D. An inquiry into the use of the polygraph in applicant evaluation and personnel screening. Michigan State University; 1964.Rec #: 2038Keywords: screening-police/ dissertations and thesesCall Number: Library, 658.3112 G59aNotes: Unpublished thesis

285.	Gordon, David F. Polygraph testing needed for trucking industry to ensure highway safety and nation's security. 1986.Rec #: 6776Keywords: polygraph general/ preemployment screening/ security screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6776

286.	Gorsuch, Lou A. Polygraph tests: Sure-shot crime stopper? The Sporting Goods Dealer. 1981(February):117-118.Rec #: 2055Keywords: screening-commercial-sporting goodsCall Number: ODS, P 2055

287.	Government is testy about polygraphs. Security World. 1983; 20(6):27.Rec #: 2060Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 2060

288.	Grafton, Kermit S. The laws that apply to honesty testing. Security Management. 1985; 29(8):33-36.Rec #: 2061Keywords: law-screening-commercial/ law-screening-paper and pencil tests/ paper and pencil tests-law/ EEOC/ law-statutes-statesCall Number: ODS, P 2061

289.	Greenberg, Eric R. Workplace testing: Results of a new AMA survey. Personnel. 1988; 65(April):38-44.Rec #: 2078Keywords: surveys-commercial-applications/ screening-commercial-surveys/ American Management AssociationCall Number: ODS, P 2078

290.	---. Workplace testing: Who's testing whom? Personnel. 1989; 66(May):39-45. ISSN: 0223-5692.Rec #: 2079Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ screening-commercial/ EPPA/ surveysCall Number: ODS, P 2079, 9903Abstract: A 1988 survey by the American Management Association of 1,005 companies examined the current trends in drug testing, polygraph testing, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in the workplace. The survey results revealed that the number of companies that tested new-hires for drugs increased from 27.7% in 1987 to 38.2% in 1988, and the testing of current employees increased 27.8% in 1987 to 36.2% in 1988. Thirey-eight percent of service firms reported using some form of drug testing, while two-thirds of manufacturing companies reported using drug testing. Results also showed that polygraph testing ecreased because of the Employee Polygraph Protection Acto of 1988, but its use ws still most prevalent in retail, wholesale, and banking and finance companies. Of the companies that reported having compulsory or voluntary HIV testing, two-thirds were in the health care field and 14% were military or government employers. Almost half of the health care firms and 13.6% of the non-health care firms surveyed offer AIDS education.

291.	Gregory, Alex L. Let's understand the lie detector. Michigan State Bar Journal. 1951; 30(2):6-11.Rec #: 2091Keywords: subjects/ countermeasures/ history/ screening-commercial/ applications-paternity/ instruments/ International Society for the Detection of Deception/ examiners-generalCall Number: ODS, P 2091Notes: Reprinted in ISDD Bulletin, 4(2), 1, 4-8.

292.	Griffith, Clyde. The pros and cons of using a polygraph to screen employees. NRA News. 1983(October):-.Rec #: 2100Keywords: screening-commercial-restaurantsCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in APA Newsletter, 17(2), 43-44. Reprinted in N. Ansley and J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 47). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

293.	Grimsley, Douglas L. and Yankee, William J. The effect of multiple retests on examiner decisions in applicant screening polygraph examinations. Charlotte, NC: A. Madley Corporation; 1986 Oct 8; NSA Contract MDA 904-85-C-A962. 91 p.Rec #: 6319Keywords: screening-preemployment/ retestingCall Number: ODS, P 6319

294.	Gugas, Chris. Better policemen through better screening. Police. 1962; 6(6, July-August):54-58.Rec #: 2143Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 2143

295.	---. Cutting losses in small business. Security World. 1976(April):35.Rec #: 2148Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2148

296.	---. The high cost of thievery. Security World. 1978; 15(12):48.Rec #: 2151Keywords: screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 2151

297.	---. New Beginning for polygraph??? The Truthseekers. 1989; 1(2, Winter).Rec #: 7325Keywords: preemployment screening/ accuracy/ anti-polygraph lawsCall Number: ODS, P 7325

298.	---. Polygraph employment screening: How it helps - Part 1. Security World. 1977; 14(9):38, 53.Rec #: 2149Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2149Notes: Reprinted in Empire State Polygraph Society Newsletter, 2(2), 27-28.

299.	---. The polygraph in business. 19859 p.Rec #: 2155Keywords: screening-commercial-CaliforniaCall Number: ODS, P 2155Notes: Paper presented before the Van Nuys Chamber of Commerce, Van Nuys, CA

300.	---. The pre-employment polygraph. APA Newsletter. 1973(2, February/March):4-10.Rec #: 2147Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: Library

301.	---. A scientifically accurate method of personnel screening. Police. 1961(November/December):19-24.Rec #: 2142Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 2142

302.	---. What the polygraph means to you. The Employee Publication of General Plant Protection Co. 1971:-.Rec #: 2145Keywords: screening methodsCall Number: ODS, P 2145

303.	Gugas, Steven. When you polygraph, do it right! Security World. 1976; 13(5):22-23.Rec #: 2161Keywords: screening-commercial/ examiners-competenceCall Number: ODS, P 2161

304.	Gunn, Bruce. The polygraph and personnel. Personnel Administration. 1970(May/June):32-37.Rec #: 2166Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-commercial-periodic/ admissibility-stipulated/ law-licensing-state/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P 2166

305.	--. Polygraph: Hoax or panacea? 1966.Rec #: 2165Keywords: screening-commercial-theft/ history/ law-licensingCall Number: ODSNotes: p. 46-58.

306.	Gurvitz, Milton. Fact versus fantasy. In : Ansley, Norman and Weir, Raymond J., Jr. Eds. Selected papers on the polygraph. Washington, DC: Board of Polygraph Examiners.; 1956; pp. 75-81. Rec #: 2168Keywords: ethics/ memory/ screening-psychological/ personality variablesCall Number: ODS, P 245

307.	Hafline, W. R. Psychologist warns against business use of lie detectors. 1976(January 13):-.Rec #: 2183Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism-validityCall Number: ODS, P 2183Notes: University of Minnesota News Service, 2 p.

308.	Hager, Philip. Lie tests for police applicants affirmed. The Truthseekers. 1989; 1(2, Winter):4.Rec #: 7324Keywords: background investigations/ reliability/ deception/ screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7324

309.	Hamilton, Neil C. Police candidate polygraph examinations: A study of statistics and opinion survey findings. 1984 Jan; Report to the Commissioner, Buffalo Police Department. 4 p.Rec #: 2197Keywords: surveys-statistical/ screening-police-Buffalo/ statistics/ Buffalo Police DepartmentCall Number: ODS, P 2197

310.	Hansen, Joyce Y. The employer's right to use the polygraph. Tucson Polygraph, Inc. Newsletter. 1977(June):-.Rec #: 2230Keywords: screening-commercial-Arizona/ cases-theftCall Number: ODS, P 2230Notes: 4 p.

311.	Hanson, Herbert M. and Esderts, William J. Polygraph: how it can help your business. Phoenix, Arizona: Hanson & Assoicates, Inc.; 1979.Rec #: 6769Keywords: examiners-expert / theft losses/ employee embezzling/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6769

312.	Hardin, M. A. What employers want to know. Polygraph. 1976; 5(4):309-314.Rec #: 2234Keywords: surveys-employers/ applications-screening-commercial/ screening-commercial-surveysCall Number: Library

313.	Harlan, John P. and Thomas, Charles C. Book review of "Applicant investigation techniques in law enforcement". The Interrogation News. 1986; 4(2, April):3-4.Rec #: 6684Keywords: FBI/ preemployment screening/ background investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 6684

314.	Harman, George W. How the polygraph can aid industry. Industrial Security. 1963; 41(October):109.Rec #: 2245Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ screening-theftCall Number: ODS, P 2245

315.	Harrelson, Leonard H. Applicant screening. nd.Rec #: 2254Keywords: subjects-banking employees/ surveys-statistical/ screening-commercial-banking/ cases-commercial/ utilityCall Number: ODS, P 2254Notes: Paper presented at the annual seminar of the Keeler Polygraph Association Alumni Association, Chicago, IL

316.	---. Euphemism and Euphony; 1961.Rec #: 6874Keywords: examiners-general/ Harrelson/ preemployment screening/ polygraph examinerCall Number: ODS, P 6874Notes: Presented to The Keeler Polygraph Institute Alumni Asssocation, Fourth Annual Seminar, Chicago, Illinois

317.	---. Selecting the right personnel with the use of the polygraph. 1969.Rec #: 2266Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ surveys-commercial/ cases-commercial/ question formulation-Keeler techniqueCall Number: ODS, P 2266Notes: Unpublished manuscript.

318.	---. Speech before the Illinois Association of Boards of Fire and Police Commissioners. 1969 Jul.Rec #: 2268Keywords: screening-firefighters/ screening-police/ question formulation-Keeler techniqueCall Number: ODS, P 2268

319.	Hartsfield, William E. Investigating employee wrongdoing in Texas. Texas Bar Journal. 1985; 48(8, Sept.):908-917.Rec #: 2283Keywords: screening-commercial-Texas/ law-Texas/ EEOC/ cases-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2283

320.	Hatch, Orrin. Statement of Sen. Orrin Hatch. Hearing before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, U.S. Senate, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23.Rec #: 2293Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2293

321.	Hayden, Trudy. Polygraphs and employment: The myth of lie detection. New York: NYCLU Privacy Project; 1981 May; pp. 1-74. Rec #: 2309Keywords: criticism-privacy/ screening-commercial/ law-laborCall Number: ODS, P 2309

322.	Hecht, Chic. Statement of Senator Chic Hecht. Hearing before the Labor and Human Resources Committee, U.S. Senate, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23.Rec #: 2318Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2318

323.	Heidinger, Robert and DeSantis, Dale. Comparison of the Reid written test to a pre-employment polygraph examination. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1987; 21(4, Jan.-Feb.):1-4.Rec #: 2322Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ paper and pencil tests/ research-paper and pencil tests/ utility/ reliability-paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 2322

324.	Heinley, David R. Congress is poised to restrict lie detector tests in private business. Security World. 1986; 23(1):19.Rec #: 2329Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2329

325.	---. The polygraph vs. the U.S. Congress. Security World. 1986; 23(6):56-60.Rec #: 2330Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2330

326.	Hemsley, Gordon D.; Heslegrave, Ronald J., and Furedy, John J. Can deception be detected when stimulus familiarity is controlled? 1979 Oct 18-1979 Oct 21.Rec #: 2341Keywords: research-screening/ psychophysiology-stress-reactions/ research-electrodermal/ techniques-screening/ Canada/ GKT/ emotional arousal/ detection of deception/ validity/ SCRCall Number: ODS, P 2341Notes: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Cincinnati, OH

327.	Henderson, Michael. Big bucks: The price Americans pay for dishonesty. Review. 1984(January 24):-.Rec #: 2343Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in APA Newsletter, 17(2), 49. Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 28). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

328.	Herbert, W. Study disputes Reagan lie detector policy. Science News. 1983; 124:292.Rec #: 2348Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 2348

329.	Hermann, Donald H. J., III. Privacy, the prospective employee and employment testing: The need to restrict polygraph and personality testing. Washington Law Review. 1971; 47(1):73-154.Rec #: 2356Keywords: screening-preemployment-legal issues/ criticism-law/ criticism-privacy/ law-laborCall Number: ODS, P 2356

330.	Herron, Daniel J. Statutory restrictions on polygraph testing in employer-employee relationships. Labor Law Journal. 1986; 37(9, Sept.):632-638.Rec #: 2358Keywords: law/ screening-employment/ law-labor/ law-limitingCall Number: ODS, P 2358

331.	Heuer, Richards J.Jr. Alcohol Use And Abuse. Polygraph. 1993; 22(1):17-45.Rec #: 9598Keywords: alcoholism/ screening-employment/ national securityCall Number: Library

332.	Hiatt, Deirdre and Hargrave, George E. Predicting job performance problems with psychological screening. Journal of Police Science and Administration. 1988; 16(2, June):122-125.Rec #: 9803Keywords: screening-law enforcement/ psychological tests/ clinical interview/ job performanceCall Number: ODS, P 9803

333.	Hibler, Russell J.; Kolski, Alan R., and Chapman, Ronald K. Pathological indices in personnel with high security clearances. nd.Rec #: 6941Keywords: personnel security assessment/ pathological behavioral indices/ security screening/ DSM-IIICall Number: ODS, P 6941Notes: Unpublished manuscript, United States Air Force

334.	Hindle, Kathleen B. The use of the polygraph in private industry. Polygraph Review. 1977; 4(1, April):7-12.Rec #: 2398Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2398

335.	Hitchings, Bradley. Lie detectors: What to do when asked to take a test. Business Week. 1978(September 4):85-86.Rec #: 2406Keywords: screening-generalCall Number: ODS, P 2406

336.	Holcomb, Richard. Ban the polygraph? The Police Chief. 1961(May):41-42.Rec #: 6824Keywords: polygraph/ legislation-California/ employee screening/ law-licensingCall Number: ODS, P 6824

337.	Holcomb, Richard L. Reader column. The Police Chief. 1962; 29(1, January):46.Rec #: 2426Keywords: criticism-screening-replyCall Number: ODS, P 2426

338.	Holden, Constance. New security measures denounced. Science. 1983; 222(November 4):487.Rec #: 2430Keywords: screening-government/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 2430, Library

339.	Holden, Peter B. Testomony of Peter B. Holden . Hearing before The Subcommittee on the Constitution, The Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection Act, 1978 Sep 21Washington, D. C.: GPO: 508-523. Rec #: 9805Keywords: preemployment screeningCall Number: Library, 342.73 Un3

340.	Holiday thefts expected to be huge. APA Newsletter. 1977(6, November/December):7.Rec #: 2435Keywords: screening-commercial-theftCall Number: Library, 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 43). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

341.	Holmes, S. F., Jr. The polygraph: Does it have a place in personnel selection? Journal of the American Polygraph Association. 1969; 1(3, November):1.Rec #: 2445Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 2445

342.	Holmes, Sam F. Jr. The polygraph: Should banks use it in selecting personnel? Southwestern Graduate School of Banking, Dallas; 1968.Rec #: 2444Keywords: dissertations and theses/ applications-screening-banking/ cases-bankingCall Number: ODS, P 2444Notes: Unpublished thesis

343.	Honesty questionnaire enables employers to determine applicant's trustworthiness. Mid-Continent Banker. 1969(October).Rec #: 2454Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ integrity tests/ bank protection act/ honesty questionnaires/ Reid ReportCall Number: ODS, P 2454

344.	Honts, Charles R. Converging evidence indicates invalidity for national security screening polygraph tests. 1991 Jun.Rec #: 2473Keywords: security screening/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 2473Notes: Paper presented at the 31st annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, October 9-13, 1991, Chicago, IL. Printed in Psychophysiology, 28(3A) (Supplement), S30. [SPR abstract]

345.	---. Counterintelligence scope polygraph (CSP) test found to be poor discriminator. Forensic Reports. 1992; 5(2):215-218.Rec #: 6330Keywords: techniques-CSP/ screening-counterintelligence/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 6330

346.	---. The emperor's new clothes: Application of polygraph tests in the American workplace. Forensic Reports. 1991; 4(2, April-June):91-116. ISSN: 0888-692X.Rec #: 6331Keywords: screening-national security/ criticism/ techniques-CQT/ techniques-R&I/ Department of Defense/ techniques-CSPCall Number: ODS, P 6331

347.	---. Psychophysiological detection of deception. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 1994; 3(3, June):77-82.Rec #: 2475Keywords: criticism-security screening/ DLCQ/ decision making/ computerized test data analysisCall Number: ODS, P 2475Abstract: Argues that security screening ought to be cut back because of FNs. DLCQs and computerized scoring make PDD more scientific and acceptable.

348.	---. A study of the reliability and validity of a polygraph test used for national security screening. 1994 Dec.Rec #: 6504Keywords: screening-national security/ techniques-CSP/ validity/ reliability/ DoDPICall Number: ODS, P 6504Notes: Unpublished manuscript

349.	Honts, Charles R.; Barland, Gordon H., and Barger, Steven D. The relative validity of criminal and screening approaches to the detection of deception. 1989.Rec #: 2478Keywords: research-laboratory/ techniques-CQT/ theory-delay/ question formulation-research/ validity-laboratory/ detection of deception/ rights-Miranda/ screening/ espionage/ interviewing/ relevant-irrelevant methodCall Number: ODS, P 2478, LibraryNotes: Paper presented at the 29th annual meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, October 18, 1989, New Orleans, LA., Abstracted in Psychophysiology, 26(4A), 33.

350.	Hooper, Dennis. Pre-employment examination uncovers 20-year-old mercy killing. APA Newsletter. 1983; 16(4):13.Rec #: 2500Keywords: screening-police/ cases-homicideCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 53). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

351.	Horvath, Frank and Meesig, Robert T. The relative utility and effectiveness of pre-employment polygraph screening for positions of trust: a concept paper. 1993 Apr 15. Monterey, CA. Rec #: 6699Keywords: preemployment screening/ applications-federalCall Number: ODS, P 6699

352.	Horvath, Frank S. Considerations in polygraph research. nd10 p.Rec #: 9811Keywords: research/ screening-preemployment/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 9811Notes: Unpublished manuscript

353.	---. In defense of pre-employment polygraph testing. 1984.Rec #: 2535Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 2535Notes: Paper presented at AAAS Symposium Detection of Deception, May 29, 1984

354.	---. Job screening. Society. 1985; 22(6, Sept-Oct.):43-46.Rec #: 2536Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 2536

355.	---. Liars and lie detection: Job screening. Society. 1985; 22(6, September/October):43-46. ISSN: 0147-2011.Rec #: 2537Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 2537

356.	---. The police candidate polygraph examination: Consideration for the police administrator. Police. 1972; 16(10):33-40.Rec #: 2521Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 2521

357.	---. Polygraphic screening of candidates for police work in large police agencies in the United States: A description of practices, policies and evaluative comments. 1991 Apr 10.Rec #: 2544Keywords: screening-police/ surveysCall Number: ODS, P 2544Notes: Unpublished manuscript, APA Archives.

358.	---. Polygraphic screening of candidates for police work in large police agencies in the United States: A survey of practices, policies, and evaluative comments. American Journal of Police. 1993; 12(4):67-86.Rec #: 9483Keywords: screening-police/ surveysCall Number: ODS, P 9483

359.	---. Pre-employment polygraph screening of candidates for police work in police agencies in the United States: A comparative survey of practices, policies and evaluative comments. 1993 Jul 2714 p.Rec #: 9484Keywords: screening-police/ surveysCall Number: ODS, P 9484Notes: Paper presented to the American Polygraph Association, Newport Beach, CA

360.	---. Public attitudes on polygraph testing: A national survey. Polygraph. 1987; 16(1, March):1-18.Rec #: 2540Keywords: surveys-public/ applications-public employees-classified access/ screening-public attitudeCall Number: LibraryAbstract: Each respondent was asked seven questions about polygraph testing and several questions about respondent characteristics. The support for polygraph testing was in circumstances of suspected criminal activity and employment that involve public safetly and national security. There was less support for the widespread, seemingly arbitrary use of polygraph testing. Respondents were almost evenly divided on the issue of mandatory periodic testing of government employees. The majority of respondents feels that neither employees nor job applicants ought to be routinely subjected to polygraph testing. Respondants who were young (18-34 years old), male, and college graduates were less likely to favor polygraph testing than older attainment. Race and political party affiliation were not generally related to attitudes toward polygraph testing. 6 tables and 12 references.

361.	---. Self-reported work-place theft, use of illicit drugs and the personal characteristics of job applicants. Security Journal. 1990; 1(4):226-234.Rec #: 2545Keywords: confessions/ screening/ utilityCall Number: ODS, P 2545, Library Notes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 21(1), pp. 23-28.

362.	Horvath, Frank S. and Phannenstill, Richard J. Pre-employment polygraph testing: The attitudes of applicants and their relationship to personal characteristics. Polygraph. 1987; 16(1):18-32.Rec #: 2549Keywords: surveys-examinees/ subjects-attitudes/ screening-commercial-attitudesCall Number: Library

363.	House committee calls for ban on government use of polygraphs. APA Monitor. 1976; 7(4):8, 10.Rec #: 2553Keywords: screening-government/ voice stress analysis/ PSE/ criticism-validityCall Number: ODS, P 2553

364.	House committee notes use of polygraph screening in federal service. APA Newsletter. 1979(5, September/October):1.Rec #: 2554Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: Library

365.	House hears testimony on bills to ban use of polygraphs by private industry employers. Narcotics Control Digest. 1985; 15(16, August 7):7.Rec #: 2555Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2555

366.	House of Commons Employment Committee. The implications for industrial relations and employment of the introduction of the polygraph. 1983-1984 Session. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1984 May 16. Rec #: 2557Keywords: techniques-compared/ validity/ screening-commercial/ Great Britain/ screening-national security/ ethics/ examiners-trainingCall Number: Library, 331.0941 G79i

367.	--. The implications for industrial relations and employment of the introduction of the polygraph. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1985.Rec #: 2558Keywords: techniques-compared/ validity/ screening-commercial/ Great Britain/ screening-national security/ ethics/ examiners-trainingCall Number: Library, 331.0941 G79iNotes: (Third report from the committee session 1984-1985. Together with the proceedings of the committee).

368.	--. The implications for industrial relations and employment of the introduction of the polygraph. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1985; Second Special Report from the Committee. Observations by the government on the Third Report of the Committee in Session 1984-85. Rec #: 2070Keywords: techniques-compared/ validity/ screening-commercial/ Great Britain/ screening-national security/ ethics/ examiners-trainingCall Number: Library, 331.0941 G79i

369.	House of Commons, Employment Committee. The implications for industrial relations and employment of the introduction of the polygraph . London : Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1984 Jun 20; Minutes of evidence. 55 p.Rec #: 2069Keywords: Great Britain/ screening-commercial-Great Britain/ applications-counterintelligence-Great Britain/ criticism-screening-Great BritainCall Number: Library, 331.0941 G79i

370.	--. The implications for industrial relations and employment of the introduction of the polygraph. London : Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1985; Memoranda laid before the Committee, Session 1984/1985. Rec #: 2071Keywords: screening-commercial-utility/ screening-commercial-Great Britain/ criticism-screening-Great Britain/ criticism-trade unions-Great Britain/ GCHQ-Great Britain/ Great BritainCall Number: Library, 331.0941 G79i

371.	House of Commons Security Commission. Report of the Security Commission May 1983. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1983; p. -. Rec #: 2559Keywords: techniques-compared/ validity/ screening-commercial/ Great Britain/ screening-national security/ ethics/ examiners-trainingCall Number: ODS, P 2559, Library, 331.0941 G79i

372.	House of Representatives - Reports on Brooks/Schroeder Bill. Polygraph. 1985; 14(2):158-190.Rec #: 2560Keywords: legislation-federal-counterintelligence/ screening-government/ applications-counterintelligence/ cases-counterintelligenceCall Number: Library

373.	How many times can employees be compelled to take polygraph tests? Protection Management. 1980(2223):1-2.Rec #: 2575Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-laborCall Number: ODS, P 2575

374.	Hunter, Fred L. How the world's largest drug wholesaler drastically reduced narcotics thefts. The Journal of Polygraph Studies. 1968; 2(4, January-February).Rec #: 2600Keywords: screening-commercial/ cases-theft/ surveys-commercial/ applications-drug industryCall Number: ODS, P 2600

375.	Hunter, Harry C. Statement of Harry C. Hunter on behalf of the National Association of Convenience Stores. Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, on S. 1845, A bill to prohibit the use of polygraphs Washington. DC: GPO; 1977 Nov 16.Rec #: 2604Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2604, Library 342.73 Un3

376.	Hurd, Sandra N. Congressional update: House bans polygraphs in the private sector. Employment Testing. 1987; 1, December(20):1-3.Rec #: 2609Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2609

377.	---. Pre-employment polygraph examinations: Proposed legislation. 1985.Rec #: 2607Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ law/ licensing/ screening-generalCall Number: ODS, P 2607Notes: Unpublished manuscript, 24 p.

378.	---. Use of the polygraph in screening job applicants. American Business Law Journal. 1985; 22(Winter):529-549.Rec #: 2608Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 2608

379.	Hutton, E. Jeremy and Larkin, Murl A. Polygraph and other stress tests. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service; 1978 Sep 27; Report No. 78-194-A. Rec #: 2616Keywords: research-laboratory/ applications-counterintelligence/ screening-commercial/ admissibility/ licensingCall Number: ODS, P 2616

380.	Iacono, William G. and Patrick, Christopher J. What psychologists should know about lie detection. (Chapter 17). In : Hess, Allen K. and Weiner, Irving B., Eds. Handbook of forensic psychology . New York: John Wiley.; 1986; pp. 460-489. Rec #: 2635Keywords: techniques-CQT/ validity/ techniques-GKTCall Number: ODS, P 2635Abstract: The most commonly used technique in specific incident investigations is the controlled question test (CQT), in which the subject responds to a series of questions about a crime posed in multiple-choice format. Field and laboratory studies on the validity of CQT results have produced mixed results: some have found the CQT accurate with both guilty and innocent subjects, while others have found it quite fallible and strongly biased against the innocent. Although the GKT has been found to be accurate in laboratory studies and should provide safeguards for the innocent, no field research has been done; and it is rarely used. Uses for polygraph tests have included testing of witnesses, suspects, and complainants; employment screening; and deterrence of employee theft and misconduct.

381.	In the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: William Scott Hepburn, Plaintiff v. Joseph L. Alioto, et al, Defendants. The Journal of Polygraph Science. 1975; 9(4):1-4.Rec #: 2675Keywords: screening-police-San Francisco/ law-labor-policeCall Number: Library

382.	Inbau, Fred E. Integrity Tests And The Law. Security Management. 1994; 38(1):34, 36, 39-41.Rec #: 9599Keywords: integrity tests/ screening/ legal issues/ psychological testing/ discriminationCall Number: ODS, P 9599

383.	Inglin, Raymond D. Applicant screening in the Los Angeles Police Department. Polygraph. 1974; 3(2):177-188.Rec #: 2725Keywords: screening-police/ Los Angeles Police/ surveys/ utilityCall Number: Library

384.	---. Police applicant polygraph examinations - Los Angeles Police Department. 1973.Rec #: 2724Keywords: screening-police/ surveys/ utility/ Los Angeles Call Number: ODS, P 2724Notes: Unpublished manuscript, 10 p.

385.	Israel, Eileen J. The validity of the pre-employment polygraph examination and the effects of motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International . 1977; 38 (11-B):5573.Rec #: 2750Keywords: research-laboratory/ validity-screening-commercial/ screening-commercial-research/ dissertations and theses/ motivationCall Number: ODS, P 2750, Library 363.254 Is7Notes: (University Microfilms No. AAD78-06008), 77 p.

386.	Janssen, John. Deterring employee theft. The Office. 1974(August):58-59. ISSN: 0030-0128.Rec #: 2774Keywords: screening-commercial-thef/ theft-employees/ preemployment screening-general/ honesty/ PSE/ background investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 2774

387.	Jaycox, Thomas H. Lies, truths: Progress report covering three years of use of the lie detector, Wichita, Kansas. Scientific American. 1939(July):8-9.Rec #: 2783Keywords: historical interest-Wichita Police Department/ screening-police/ Wichita Police Department/ Keeler polygraphCall Number: ODS, P 2783

388.	Jayne, Brain C. A prosecutor's Guide to the use of polygraph results. The Prosecutor. 1991; 24(4, Spring ):17-22.Rec #: 6698Keywords: admissibility/ evidence/ screening/ polygraph techniques/ Frye case/ confessions-admissibilityCall Number: ODS, P 6698

389.	Jayne, Brian C. A comparison between the predictive value of two common pre-employment screening procedures. The Investigator. 1989; 5(3, Summer):3-5.Rec #: 2796Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ validity-paper and pencil tests/ validity-field examinations/ research-fieldCall Number: ODS, P 2796, LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, Vol. 18, (4), 203-207, (1989)

390.	---. Interviewing Strategies That Defeat Deceit. Security Management. 1994; 38(2):37-38, 40,42.Rec #: 9602Keywords: interviewing/ screening / discrimination/ corporate security/ employees-legal status/ sex discrimination/ U.S. Supreme CourtCall Number: ODS, P 9602

391.	---. The Search For An Honest Work Force. Security Management . 1994; 38(1):47-48, 50.Rec #: 9603Keywords: screening-employment/ psychological testing/ computer technologyCall Number: ODS, P 9603

392.	Jenkins, John A. Business' little black box. TWA Ambassador. 1979(June):53-55, 57.Rec #: 2801Keywords: criticism/ screening-commercial-PSECall Number: ODS, P 2801

393.	John E. Reid and Associates, Inc. Guidelines for th proper use of the polygraph technique by the employer. nd10.Rec #: 7472Keywords: accuracy/ preemployment screening/ deceptionCall Number: ODS, P 7472, 9903

394.	Johnson, Lyndon B.Letter To: The President of United States. 1966 Jul 29. 10.Rec #: 6799Keywords: validity/ employee screening/ cases-criminalCall Number: ODS, P 6799

395.	Johnson, William R. The ambivalent polygraph. Et Cetera. 1987; 44(4, Winter):354-365.Rec #: 2824Keywords: applications-intelligence/ applications-counterintelligence/ screening-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 2824Notes: Reprinted from International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, 1(3) (1986)

396.	Johnston, Alva. The magic lie detector. Saturday Evening Post. 1944; 216(April 15, 22 & 29):9-11, 20, 26-27.Rec #: 2825Keywords: screening-general/ historical interest-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 2825

397.	Johnston, David L. Flunk those test cheats. Security . 1995; 32(7):55.Rec #: 9315Keywords: employee screening/ psychological testsCall Number: ODS, P 9315

398.	Jones, E. A., Jr. "Truth" and the polygraph as arbitrator: The deception of "detection" in the "diagnosis of truth and deception". 1978 Apr 684 p.Rec #: 6345Keywords: polygraph-general/ criticism/ validity/ reliability/ techniques-CQT/ screening-commercial/ law-federal/ admissibility/ arbitrationCall Number: ODS, P 6345Notes: Paper presented at the National Academy of Arbitrators, New Orleans, LA

399.	Jones, Hugh E. The employee polygraph protection act: What are the consequences? The Narc Officer. 1989; 5(5, May):41-42.Rec #: 6343Keywords: employee polygraph protection act/ screening-commercial-applicants/ EPPACall Number: ODS, P 6343

400.	Jussim, Daniel. Lies, damn lies - and polygraphs. The Nation. 1985; 241(21):681-684.Rec #: 3452Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3452

401.	Kaler, Irving K. A mole among gerbils (lie detector usage in hiring practice). Newsweek. 1985; 105(March 11):14-15. ISSN: 0028-9604.Rec #: 2876Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ criticism-privacyCall Number: ODS, P 2876

402.	Kantor, Seth. How to foil employe crime. Nation's Business. 1983(July):38-39.Rec #: 2884Keywords: screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 2884

403.	Kantrowitz, Laura. Polygraph testing for employment. The Privacy Report. 1975; 2(6, April):1-9.Rec #: 2885Keywords: screening-preemployment/ screening-federal/ criticism/ ACLUCall Number: ODS, P 2885

404.	Katkin, Edward S. Polygraph testing, psychological research, and public policy: An introductory note. American Psychologist. 1985; 40(3, March):346-347. ISSN: 0003-066X.Rec #: 2897Keywords: legislation-federal/ applications-national security/ screening-federal/ American Psychological AssociationCall Number: ODS, P 2897

405.	Keeler, Leonarde. Lie detector applications. In : Dilworth, Donald C., Ed. Silent witness . Gaithersburg, MD: International Association of Chiefs of Police.; 1931; pp. 151-153. Rec #: 2920Keywords: historical interest/ screening-commercial-investigations/ stimulation tests/ techniques-Keeler/ techniques-peak of tension/ techniques-stimulation tests/ question formulation-relevant-Keeler techniqueCall Number: ODS, P 2920, Library 364.128 SilNotes: Reprinted from IACP Proceedings, 1931, p. 184.

406.	Keeping secrets secret. The Lipman Report. 1981(November 15):1-2.Rec #: 2940Keywords: screening-government/ Central Intelligence AgencyCall Number: ODS, P 2940

407.	Kelley, Ty. Statement by Ty Kelley for the National Association of Chain Drug Stores, Inc. Polygraph. 1977; 6(4):350-355.Rec #: 2944Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-commercial-pharmacies/ surveys-pharmacies/ utility-pharmacies/ National Association of Chain Drug StoresCall Number: Library

408.	---. Statement of Ty Kelley on behalf of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores . Hearing before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution, on S. 1845, The Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection Act of 1977 Washington, DC: GPO; 1977 Nov 16.Rec #: 2945Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ National Association of Chain Drug StoresCall Number: ODS, P 2945, Library, 342.73 Un3

409.	Kelly, Richard B. and Fisher, John A. Polygraph cuts inside theft, but faces legal opposition. National Jeweler. 1978(September):1, 14.Rec #: 2950Keywords: screening-commercial-jewelers/ surveys-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2950

410.	Kemp, Jack F. Legislation to prohibit the use of lie detectors in hiring practices. Congressional Record. 1980(June 16):E2978-2979.Rec #: 2955Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 2955

411.	Kendrick, Delvin H. Use of polygraph by law enforcement agencies: A survey. Polygraph. 1983; 12(1, March):18-37.Rec #: 2958Keywords: surveys-law enforcement/ screening-police/ examiners-training/ examiners-compensation/ applications-internal investigations/ techniques-used in law enforcement/ licensing-stateCall Number: Library

412.	Kirby, A. J. The machine is the jury. Business Journal. 1962(January):62.Rec #: 2984Keywords: screening-commercial/ Great BritainCall Number: ODS, P 2984

413.	Kleiman, Lawrence S.; Faley, Robert H., and Denton, David W. Legal issues concerning polygraph testing in the public sector. Public Personnel Management. 1990; 19(4, Winter ):365-379.Rec #: 9328Keywords: screening-government/ legal issues/ privacyCall Number: ODS, P 9328Abstract: Examines the legal issues related to the use of the polygraph in the public employment setting. 19 written judicial decisions were reviewed to determine the legal parameters surrounding the administration of the polygraph and the use and dissemination of polygraph results. Implications pertaining to polygraph testing are discussed in terms of privacy rights, defamation of character, due process rights, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and involuntary self-incrimination.

414.	Kleinmuntz, Benjamin. Lie detectors fail the truth test. Harvard Business Review. 1985(July/August):36-37, 40, 42.Rec #: 3017Keywords: criticism-screening/ criticism-validityCall Number: ODS, P 3017

415.	Klump, Carl S. Honesty testing. Security World. 1984; 21(8):71-74.Rec #: 3037Keywords: honesty/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3037

416.	---. Understanding polygraph use in retail security. Security World. 1974(December):29, 71, 73.Rec #: 3034Keywords: screening-commercial-retailCall Number: ODS, P 3034

417.	Koch, Edward I. On polygraph testing. Congressional Record - Extension of Remarks. 1975(March 5):E913-915.Rec #: 3054Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-general/ criticism-privacyCall Number: ODS, P 3054

418.	Kouri, James J. Federal polygraph law: A blow to private security. The Narc Officer. 1989; 5(5, May):37-39.Rec #: 6351Keywords: screening-preemployment/ EPPA/ Employee Polygraph Protection ActCall Number: ODS, P 6351

419.	Krapohl, Donald J. and Heckman, R. Preemployment polygraph practices in the private sector - A survey. Polygraph. 1984; 13(3, September):251-262.Rec #: 7912Keywords: applications-screening-preemployment/ surveys/ constitutional rightsCall Number: ODS, P 7912, LibraryAbstract: Data show that the average pretest interview was 33.5 minutes in length, and that the average examination minutes in length, and that the average examination period was 59.4 minutes. Respondents reported a very low rate of applicant test refusal (.5 percent) and noncooperation with specific areas of inquiry (.4 percent). Most polygraphers employed a deceptive/nondeceptive rating system, as opposed to pass/fail, recommended/nonrecommended, or other scoring systems. All examiners offered applicants an opportunity to explain difficulties, and none inquired into sexual activities. Results suggest that unethical practices and invasions of privacy in the administration of pre-employment polygraph examinations may not be as pervasive as claimed by critics. The patterns of use reported by these respondents contrast strikingly with the negative image often popularized by the press.

420.	Krupka, William M. Statement of William M. Krupka, Vice President of Perry Drug Stores, Inc. Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate Washington, DC: GPO; 1977 Nov 16.Rec #: 3103Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ applications-pharmacies/ screening-commercial-pharmaciesCall Number: ODS, P 3103

421.	Lambert, Robert W. The Psychological stress evaluator: A recent development in lie detector technology. University of California Davis Law Review. 1974; 7:332-354.Rec #: 3158Keywords: voice stress analysis/ PSE/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3158

422.	Lampert, J. Lie detectors: Industrial use of the polygraph. DePaul Law Review. 1964; 13:287-296.Rec #: 3159Keywords: legislation/ industrial use/ screening-commercial/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P 3159

423.	Landau, Jack C. Statement of the reporters committee for Freedom of the Press. Before the Subcommittee on Legislation and Natinal Security the committee on Government Operations, U. S. House of Representatives; Washington, D. C. 1983 Oct 19.Rec #: 6763Keywords: employees/ background investigations/ security screening/ Reagan administrationCall Number: ODS, P 6763

424.	Lander, David. To tell the truth: One dealer's experience with polygraph testing. Audio Retailer. 1986; 2(1, January):42-46.Rec #: 3161Keywords: screening-commercial/ cases-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3161

425.	---. The truth about polygraphy: Examining the lie detector. Audio Retailer. 1986; 2(2, February):1-6.Rec #: 3162Keywords: screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 3162

426.	Largent, R. E. Nuclear command and control: Should personnel selection criteria include the polygraph? Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College; 198975 p.Rec #: 6354Keywords: screening-nuclear command and controlCall Number: ODS, P 6354Notes: A defense analytical study submitted to the faculty in fulfillment of the curriculum requirement

427.	Law limits Department of Defense from expanding polygraph use. APA Newsletter. 1983; 16(4):1-2.Rec #: 3241Keywords: law-federal/ applications-national security/ screening-governmentCall Number: Library

428.	Lawrence, G. H. Noted psychiatrist views the polygraph. Police. 1965; 10(2):46-48. ISSN: 0032-2563.Rec #: 3243Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 3243

429.	---. The psychiatrist, the polygraph, and police selection. Security World. 1966(March):23-25.Rec #: 3244Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 3244

430.	Lawton, Mary C. Keynote addressed to the personnel security research symposium. 1988 Jun 2115.Rec #: 6725Keywords: polygraph general/ screening/ background investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 6725

431.	Laxer, Bern. Nine imperative and far-reaching reasons why the polygraph bill should be vetoed!; 1988. Rec #: 3246Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3246Notes: Privately printed, 30 p.

432.	Lee, Clarence D. I cannot tell a lie. Forbes. 1941(January 15).Rec #: 3263Keywords: cases-commercial/ screening-commercial-theft/ screening-commercial-investigations/ applications-bonding/ historical interest-screening/ historical interest-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3263

433.	Leishman, Katie. Lie detectors at work. McCall's. 1978; 105(9):57.Rec #: 3282Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3282

434.	Leistler, Ken. On the path to wearing blue. The Professional Polygraphist. 1989(October):5.Rec #: 6758Keywords: preemployment screening/ background investigations/ applications-policeCall Number: ODS, P 6758Abstract: The polygraph examiner for the City of Cincinnati Police Department tabulated the results of city civil service screening of police and fire department applicants for the year 1988. the Personnel Department of the City of Cincinnati processed 5,651 applicants for police and fire department positions in 1988. The written examinations were administered to 3,489, of whom 1,047 (30%) failed. Of those who passed the examination, 1,029 scored high enough for further processing (30%), involving a medical examination, psychologic screening, and a physical ability test. There were 345 candidates who survived that phase of processing, and they were scheduled for pre-employment polygraph examinations. Of the 345 applicants for police and fire department positions, 170 were disqualified based on their admissions made during polygraph testing. The elimination of 52% of those tested was, in 92% of the cases, based on admitted use or sale of illegal substances. Other causes for rejection were thefts from employers, false statements on the application, cheating during other testing procedures, and driving while under the influence or driving without an operator's license. There were 113 applicants certified for appointment in 1988, and 80 were appointed. The 80 represented 1.4% of those initially processed.

435.	Levine, Edward L. Introductory remarks for the symposium: Polygraph examining for pre-employment screening. Polygraph. 1980; 9(1):1-3.Rec #: 3305Keywords: screening-generalCall Number: Library

436.	Lewe, William T. Warehouse security. Security World. 1964(November):22-24, 29.Rec #: 3314Keywords: utility-commercial/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3314

437.	Libbin, Anne E.; Mendelsohn, Susan R., and Duffy, Dennis P. The right to privacy at the workplace, Part 5: Employee medical and honesty testing. Personnel. 1988; 65(11):38-48. ISSN: 0031-5702.Rec #: 9497Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment-medical/ honesty tests/ screening-commercial-preemployment/ Title VII/ privacy rights/ screening-commercial-preemployment-legal issuesCall Number: ODS, P 9497

438.	Liddicoat, Britt D. Polygraph testing of employees in private industry. 1985 Aug 719 p.Rec #: 3327Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ criticism/ privacy/ screening-commercial/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 3327Notes: Congressional Research Service #85-929A, Library of Congress

439.	Lie detectors for employees. Labor and Management.Rec #: 3417Keywords: theft losses/ lie detectors and detection/ employee screening/ store thefts/ labor unions/ Deception Tests Service Co/ applications-commercial/ applications-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 3417

440.	Lie detectors to private eyes: Anti-shoplifting battle heats up. U.S. News and World Report. 1977(November 28):61.Rec #: 3427Keywords: screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 3427, Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in APA Newsletter , 6, 7. Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 43). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association

441.	Life after EPPA: Polygraphers cope with testing limits and learn some political lessons. Security Letter. 1989; 19(18, October 2):p. 2, Part I, Corrected copy. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 3453Keywords: EPPA/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3453

442.	Lindberg, George W. Progress in polygraph research. nd.Rec #: 3457Keywords: polygraph-general/ research/ field/ Reid/ instruments/ cases-theft/ cases-homicide/ screening-police/ admissions/ utility Call Number: ODS, P 3457Notes: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph ExaminersAbstract: Pneumotach, spirometer, infrared flow, oxygen ratios, doppler pneumo, doppler movement, plethysmograph.

443.	--. The Reid police candidate selection program. nd; Inter-office report, John E. Reid & Associates. Rec #: 3459Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 3459

444.	--. The Reid polygraph in employee evaluations. 1964; Interoffice report, John E. Reid & Associates. Rec #: 3463Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ Reid reportCall Number: ODS, P 3463

445.	---. A test for truth. Security World. 1968(January).Rec #: 3466Keywords: screening-preemployment/ applications-investigations/ Reid reportCall Number: ODS, P 3466

446.	Linehan, John G. An aspect of World War II use of the polygraph. Polygraph. 1978; 7(3):233-239.Rec #: 3473Keywords: applications-counterintelligence-World War II/ screening-World War II/ history/ applications-prisoners of war-GermanCall Number: Library

447.	---. The Oak Ridge polygraph program, 1946-1953. Polygraph. 1990; 19(2):131-137.Rec #: 9067Keywords: screening-government/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 9067, Library

448.	Link, Frederick C. What is the best method of lie detection? an essay on the state of the art (part I). The Interrogation News. 1985; 3(4, October):7-8.Rec #: 6683Keywords: security screening/ attitudesCall Number: ODS, P 6683

449.	Linowes, David F. Antipolygraphy. The Wharton Magazine. 1981; 5(2):66. ISSN: 0145-4188.Rec #: 7546Keywords: preemployment screening/ privacy/ witnesses/ anti-polygraph lawsCall Number: ODS, P 7546, 9903

450.	List, Brian E. The utility of polygraph in counterintelligence: A viable screening and investigative tool. 1997 May 9.Rec #: 7404Keywords: counterintelligence/ screening/ detection of deception/ computerized polygraph/ autonomic nervous system/ systolic blood pressure/ validity/ espionageCall Number: ODS, P 7404

451.	Livingston, Robert L. Testimony of the Honorable Robert L. Livingston. Polygraph . 1985; 14 (3):228-229.Rec #: 3501Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: LibraryNotes: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities of the House Committee on Education and Labor

452.	Lopez, Peggie L. Effects of pre-employment polygraph testing on employee attitudes. Polygraph. 1986; 15(3, Sept.):195-202.Rec #: 3520Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ research-attitudes/ surveysCall Number: ODS, P 3520, LibraryAbstract: Some researchers have suggested that requiring job applicants to take preemployment polygraph tests may cultivate negative attitudes toward the employer likely to motivate employee theft. To test this hypothesis, this study selected 24 job applicants for retail sales or restaurant positions who had already volunteered to take preemployment polygraph polygraph examination. A questionnaire administered to the subjects measured anticipated employee satisfaction, applicant awareness of the employer's antitheft policy, and anticipated chance of apprehension for employee theft. Half of the subjects were randomly chosen to be given the questionnaire just prior to the polygraph exam, and the other half were administered the questionnaire after the test. There were no statistically reliable differences in the two groups' responses to the questionnaire. Since the complete sample consisted only of those who had already consented to the polygraph test, the subjects may differ from persons who would not agree to the polygraph exam. Future studies should measure applicant attitudes at various stages in the employment process. 2 tables, 7 references, and the questionnaire.

453.	---. Results of law enforcement pre-employment drugs survey. NAWP Journal. 1987; 2:24-26.Rec #: 3521Keywords: surveys-drug use/ screening-police/ utilityCall Number: ODS, P 3521

454.	Lowe, Richard A. Regulation of polygraph testing in the employment context: suggested statutory control on test use and examiner competence. University of California, Davis Law Review . 1981; 15(1, Fall):113-133.Rec #: 6728Keywords: preemployment screening-general/ Accuracy/ testingCall Number: ODS, P 6728

455.	Lydon, Kerrigan. Employee theft: A costly fringe benefit. Security World. 1984(April):27-31.Rec #: 3534Keywords: screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 3534

456.	Lykken, David T. The case against the polygraph in employment screening. Personnel Administrator. 1985; 30(9, September):58-65.Rec #: 3572Keywords: criticism-screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3572

457.	---. David T. Lykken replies . Psychology Today. 1975; 9(3, August):13.Rec #: 3549Keywords: polygraph-criticism/ applications-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 3549Abstract: [Letter to the editor] Lykken defends article in March issue

458.	---. ...In a tumor in the brain (sic! sic! sic!). A book review of Pre-employment polygraphy, by Robert J. Ferguson and Chris Gugas, Sr. Contemporary Psychology. 1985; 30:880-881.Rec #: 3574Keywords: book reviews/ screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 3574

459.	---. Introductory comments. 1984 May 24-1984 May 295 p.Rec #: 6362Keywords: techniques-CQT/ techniques-GKT/ screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6362Notes: AAAS Symposium the Detection of Deception in 1984, New York City

460.	---. The lie detector industry - Just nine more years to 1984. Modern Medicine. 1975(October 1):59-63.Rec #: 3551Keywords: criticism/ validity/ screening-employmentCall Number: ODS, P 3551

461.	---. Physiological detection of deception: The theory and the evidence. 1984 May 24-1984 May 296 p.Rec #: 6363Keywords: criticism-validity/ techniques-CQT-criticism/ theory-polygraph/ screening-criticismCall Number: ODS, P 6363Notes: AAAS Symposium the Detection of Deception in 1984, New York City

462.	---. Polygraphic interrogation: Statement prepared for the Royal Commission into Metropolitan Toronto Police Practices. 1975 Jun28 p.Rec #: 9861Keywords: history/ theory/ test procedures/ validity/ screening-employment/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P9861Notes: Unpublished manuscriptAbstract: on file

463.	---. The probity of the polygraph. In: Kassin, Saul M. and Wrightsman, Lawrence S., Eds. The psychology of evidence and trial procedure: Sage Press; 1985; pp. 95-123. Rec #: 3575Keywords: criticism-validity/ techniques-CQT/ countermeasures/ jurorsCall Number: ODS, P 3575Abstract: Polygraph evidence is admissible under stipulation in some jurisdictions and not admissible in others. At least two categories of tests and two categories of examiners exist. The control-question test is now the standard technique, other test forms exist as well. A recent literature survey revealed that no evidence exists regarding the validity of the preemployment screening test widely used by Federal security agencies. In addition, the psychological assumptions underlying the tests are implausible. Credible scientific evidence regarding validity exists only for the control-question test and indicates that it is wrong one-third of the time. Its accuracy rate in particular applications depends on the base rate of lying in the population being tested. As used by defense counsel, its accuracy may be less than 50 percent. Moreover, the test is also biased against innocent, truthful witnesses, who have more than a 40 percent chance of being inaccurately diagnosed as deceptive. The test is unavoidably subjective. It can also be undermined by guilty suspects using self-stimulation during control questions. Studies using mock juries have found that unrebutted polygraph evidence is influential with a majority of jurors. However, competent scientific rebuttal testimony can convince juries that the use of the polygraph indicates a weakness in the case. Notes and 46 references.

464.	---. Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist. 1974; 29(10, October):725-739.Rec #: 3547Keywords: polygraph-theory/ history/ criticism-screening-commercial/ techniques-guilty knowledge test/ instrumentation/ test data analysis/ criticism-validity/ examinersCall Number: ODS, P 3547

465.	--. Psychology and the lie detector industry. Minneapolis, Minnesota : University of Minnesota ; 1974 Jan 25; Reports from Research Laboratories No. PR-74-1 . 44 p.Rec #: 3548Keywords: criticism-general/ techniques-guilty knowledge test/ examiners/ screening-commercial/ polygraph-generalCall Number: ODS, P 3548

466.	---. Testimony of David T. Lykken. Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, on S. 1845, Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection Act Washington, DC: GPO; 1977 Nov 15: 8-33. Rec #: 3555Keywords: validity-surveys/ screening-general/ criticism-validity/ legislation-federal-commercialCall Number: Library, 342.73 Un3

467.	Lyle, Herbert P. Arson and the polygraph - 1952 revisited. Polygraph. 1980; 9(4):272-281.Rec #: 7942Keywords: applications-arson/ polygraph/ techniquesCall Number: LibraryAbstract: The polygraph examiner may assist the arson investigator by screening suspects, witnesses, informants, and complainants. Suspects are examined by asking them specific questions (e.g., how the fire started) to which only "yes" or "no" answers can be given. More detailed questions are asked after the screening process is completed. The questions may concern the identity of the arsonist, the circumstances, and the motives of the crime. The close cooperation between the investigator and the polygraph examiner is essential. For example, accurate information must be given to the polygraph examiner prior to the test since false reactions of the subject will be obtained when false information is given. Since the polygraph technique involves the recording of changes in the physiology of certain bodily systems, the subject's physiology should be normal at the test time (e.g., the subject should not be tired). Frequently, the question is raised as to the advisability of the polygraph since the results may not be used in court. However, the polygraph is useful in helping investigators decide on the right course of action. Cases in which the polygraph helped determine guilt or innocence are described.

468.	Lynch, Michael B. Pre-employment technique & structure for law enforcement. 19916.Rec #: 6749Keywords: validity/ relevant-irrelevant method/ preemployment screening-general/ law enforcement/ applications-policeCall Number: ODS, P 6749Notes: submitted to Polygraph Jan.91, rejected

469.	MacNitt, Reginald D. In defense of electrodermal response and cardiac amplitude as measures of deception. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 1942; 33(3, September-October 1942):266-275.Rec #: 3614Keywords: research-screening-commercial/ historical interest-electrodermal/ historical interest-cardio/ validity-commercial/ cases-commercial/ test data analysis-global/ cardio/ electrodermalCall Number: ODS, P 3614

470.	Making government clam up. Time. 1983; 122(October 31):40.Rec #: 3631Keywords: screening-federal/ applications-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 3631

471.	Malinowski, Benjamin F., CWO (Instr, LD Comm, DSI, USAMPS). Report of TDY. 1963 Oct 17.Rec #: 6987Keywords: employee screening/ security screening/ CIA/ National Security AgencyCall Number: ODS, P 6987

472.	Manual on defeating the polygraph through countermeasures. nd39 p.Rec #: 9152Keywords: countermeasures/ screening-general/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 9152Notes: Unpublished manuscript

473.	Markman, Stephen J. Statement of Stephen J. Markman, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Policy. Hearing before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, U.S. Senate concerning s.1815: The Polygraph Protection Act of 1985. Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23: 24-56. Rec #: 3687Keywords: screening-general/ legislation-federal-commercial/ U.S. Department of JusticeCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in Polygraph, 15, 318-324 and in Security Management, 31(10), 55-59.Abstract: Principles to be weighed when deciding whether a function belongs at the State or Federal level include dispersal of power, accountability, participation, diversity, competition, experimentation, and containment in regard to disposal of power. For example, States can recognize polygraph abuse by private employers as well as the Federal Government, especially since accountable are at stake. Seventy pecent of the States have already provided polygraph legislation. Polygraph use should be evaluated by the States in terms of other investigative alternatives and consumer, employee, and employer interests. The test is useful in screening airport security personnal involved with nuclear materials and truck drivers who transport hazardous materials. States that have regulated polygraphs testing have done so in diverse ways, allowing for alternatives according to citizen opposition or support. Nineteen States regulate employer use of the test, some completely ban it, others prohibit it to be an employment requirement, and six States regulate polygraph examiners.

474.	Martin, Richard. Federal pulses quicken over "bloodless third degree.". Insight. 1986; 2(3, January 20):18-21.Rec #: 3722Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 3722

475.	Matarazzo, Joseph D.; Allen, Bernadene V.; Saslow, George, and Wiens, Arthur N. Characteristics of successful policemen and fireman applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1964; 48(2):123-133.Rec #: 3735Keywords: screening-police/ screening-firefightersCall Number: ODS, P 3735

476.	Matthews, Herbert R. Statement of Herbert R. Matthews, on behalf of the American Trucking Associations. Hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, on S. 1815 Employee Polygraph Protection Act Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23.Rec #: 3762Keywords: screening-commercial-trucking/ legislation-federal-commercial/ American Trucking AssociationCall Number: ODS, P 3762

477.	Mazzei, John. Hearing before the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary. Testimony of John Mazzei, Director of Security, Transcom Lines, Inc. and President, American Trucking Association Security Council on behalf of American Trucking Associations, Inc. Washington, DC: GPO; 1977 Nov 16.Rec #: 3777Keywords: screening-commercial/ applications-theft/ legislation-federal-commercial/ American Trucking AssociationCall Number: ODS, P 3777, Library, 342.42 Un3

478.	McCubbin, James A.; Wilson, John F.; Bruehl, Stephen; Brady, Marianne; Clark, Kevin, and Kort, Eva. Gender effects on blood pressures obtained during an on-campus screening. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1991; 53(1, Jan-Feb):90-100.Rec #: 6652Keywords: BLOOD PRESSURE/ SEX DIFFERENCES/ STRESS REACTIONSCall Number: ODS, P 6652Abstract: During a blood pressure (BP) screening of 77 male and 71 female college students (aged 18-35 yrs), the gender of the screener was varied. Four repeated determinations of resting systolic and diastolic BP were obtained, and Ss completed tests to assess sensitivity to psychosocial stress. Females showed higher initial systolic BP levels when tested by a male. Males showed similar initial systolic BP regardless of screener gender. Males high in anger suppression showed lower BPs than males low in anger suppression. Females high in anger suppression showed higher BPs than females low in anger suppression. Ss reporting high hostility showed significantly higher initial systolic BPs than Ss reporting low hostility.

479.	McEvoy, J. P. I cannot tell a lie! Forbes. 1941(January 15):-.Rec #: 3798Keywords: screening-commercial-theft/ screening-commercial-investigations/ cases-commercial/ historical interest-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 3798Notes: [reprint]

480.	---. The lie detector goes into business. Reader's Digest. 1941; 38(February):69-72. ISSN: 0034-0375.Rec #: 3799Keywords: screening-commercial/ historical interest-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 3799

481.	McInerney, Charles A. Routine screening of criminal suspects by the polygraph (lie detector) technique. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 1955; 45(6, March-April):736-742.Rec #: 3811Keywords: screening-suspects/ techniques-peak of tension/ surveys-statistical-criminal cases/ cases-burglaryCall Number: ODS, P 3811Notes: Allegheny County Police Crime Laboratory, PA

482.	McKinney, Stewart B. Testimony of the Honorable Stewart B. McKinney (R-CT). Hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources Polygraph in the workplace Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23.Rec #: 3822Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3822

483.	Meesig, Robert T. Usage, practices and policies of polygraph ("lie detector") screening in police agenices in the United States. Dissertation Abstracts International. 1994; 33(3):989.Rec #: 4344Keywords: preemployment screening/ policyCall Number: Library, 658.3112 M47uAbstract: To determine the extent of use and perceptions of pre-employment polygraph screnng (PEPS) among police agencies in the United States.

484.	Meesig, Robert T. and Horvath, Frank S. Changes In Usage, Practices And Policies In Pre-Employment Polygraph Testing In Law Enforcement Agencies In The United States 1964-1991. Polygraph . 1993; 22(1):1-16.Rec #: 9604Keywords: screening-preemployment/ law enforcement/ applicantsCall Number: Library

485.	---. A national survey of practices, policies and evaluative comments on the use of pre-employment polygraph screening in police agencies in the United States. Polygraph . 1995; 24(2):57-131.Rec #: 9353Keywords: applications-police/ surveys-police/ preemployment screeningCall Number: Library

486.	Menocal, Armando M., III and Williams, James M. Lie detectors in private employment: A proposal for balancing interests. George Washington Law Review. 1965; 33:932-954.Rec #: 3850Keywords: screening-commercial/ validity/ reliability/ privacy/ legislation/ law-laborCall Number: ODS, P 3850

487.	Mervis, Jeffrey. Defense fights tide in plan to expand use of polygraph. Monitor. 1984; 15(5):3.Rec #: 3859Keywords: screening-government/ legislation-federal/ criticism-general/ American Psychological Association/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 3859

488.	---. In leak hubbub, DoD skirts issue: Do lie detectors lie? APA Monitor. 1983; 14(2):28. ISSN: 0001-2114.Rec #: 3858Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ screening-government/ criticism-general/ American Psychological Association/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 3858

489.	Metzgar, Herbert D. Pre-employment polygraph APLT. nd12 p.Rec #: 9029Keywords: screening-police/ techniques-alternate probable lie testCall Number: ODS, P 9029Notes: Unpublished manuscript

490.	Moeller, Leonard R. Loss prevention pays off for banks as a result of planned protection. 1953(May 15):-.Rec #: 3940Keywords: screening-commercial-bankingCall Number: ODS, P 3940Notes: Excerpts from an address before the North Dakota Bankers Association

491.	Moffatt, John E. An integrated program of pre-employment and routine polygraph examinations. 1963 Sep.Rec #: 3950Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 3950Notes: Paper presented at the annual seminar of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners, Chicago, IL

492.	Mondello, Anthony L. Statement of Anthony L. Mondello, General Counsel of the United States Civil Service Commission. Hearing before the Foreign Operations and Government Information Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Operations Washington, DC: GPO; 1974 Jun 5.Rec #: 3955Keywords: screening-federal/ legislation-federal/ regulations-U.S. Civil Service CommissionCall Number: ODS, P 3955

493.	Moran, Kenneth W. The polygraph and the employer. 1962 Aug.Rec #: 3966Keywords: pretest interview/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 3966Notes: Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners, Chicago, IL

494.	---. Use of the polygraph in police applicant screening. 1963 Sep.Rec #: 3967Keywords: pretest interview-screening-police/ screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 3967Notes: Paper presented at the 10th annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners, Chicago, IL

495.	Moree, William T. and Flynn, Walter L. Lie detector valuable aid in bonding field. The Weekly Underwriter. nd:-.Rec #: 3971Keywords: applications-bonding/ screening-commercial-bondingCall Number: ODS, P 3971Notes: Reprinted in Truth - The polygraph story, Associated Research.

496.	Moretti, Donald M. The prediction of employee counterproductivity through attitude assessment. 1982 Sep.Rec #: 3973Keywords: screening-commercial-paper and pencil tests/ theft-attitudes/ surveys-counterproductivity/ subjects-attitudes/ paper and pencil tests-research/ research-paper and pencil tests/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 3973Notes: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

497.	Morris, Jim. Pre-employment polygraph screening of police recruits. APA Newsletter. 1987; 20(4):16-17.Rec #: 3982Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 3982, Library

498.	Morse, Wayne. Use of lie detectors on applicants for government agencies. Congressional Record. 1952; 98(7, January 17):-.Rec #: 3993Keywords: applications-counterintelligence-screening/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 3993Notes: Reprinted in ISDD Bulletin, 5(4), 3-7.

499.	Moss, Debra Cassens. Lie detectors in the workplace: Fired employees may have cause for action. ABA Journal. 1986(October 1):22. ISSN: 0747-0088.Rec #: 3999Keywords: law-screening-commerical-fired employees/ screening-commercial/ law-labor-rightsCall Number: ODS, P 3999

500.	Mosser, Frederick W., Vice President, General Manager (The Speghetti Machine & Noodle Works Restaurant, Kensington, M. D.). Statement of Frederick W. Mosser. Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate. Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Proctection Act, September 21, 1978. Washington, D. C.: GPO; 1978: 504-508. Rec #: 9877Keywords: preemployment screeningCall Number: Library, 342.73 Un3

501.	Mueller, William. Truth or consequences. Security Systems Administration. 1985; 14(1, January):22-24.Rec #: 4015Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4015

502.	Murderer confesses during screening test. APA Newsletter. 1977(3, May/June):10.Rec #: 4038Keywords: cases-homicide/ screening-admissionCall Number: Library

503.	Murphy, Betty S. Developments in job related polygraph examinations. Personnel Journal. 1988; 67(January):26-28.Rec #: 4041Keywords: screening-commercial/ legislation-federalCall Number: ODS, P 4041

504.	Must a suspect have freedom of choice in "volunteering" for a lie detector test. Protection Management. 1975(2118):3-4.Rec #: 4053Keywords: law-commercial-screening/ law-labor-rights/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4053

505.	Must failing a polygraph test cost an employee his job. Corporate Security. 1984; 11(November):8.Rec #: 4054Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-labor-rightsCall Number: ODS, P 4054

506.	Nagle, David E. The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988: Compromise or cop out? Legal Backgrounder. 1988(June 17):1-4.Rec #: 4071Keywords: law-federal-commercial screening/ Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988Call Number: ODS, P 4071

507.	---. The polygraph in employment: Applications and legal considerations. Polygraph. 1985; 14(1, March):1-33.Rec #: 4070Keywords: screening-commercial-legal issuesCall Number: ODS, P 4070, Library

508.	---. The polygraph in the workplace. University of Richmond Law Review. 1983; 18(1, Fall):43-76.Rec #: 4069Keywords: screening-employment/ law-limiting/ polygraph generalCall Number: ODS, P 4069

509.	---. Polygraph in the workplace; nd.Rec #: 4068Keywords: history/ instrumentation/ examinees/ examiners/ reliability/ validity/ applications-screening-preemployment/ applications-screening-periodic/ applications-screening-specific/ constitutional rights/ legislation-state/ legislation-federal/ National Labor Relations Act/ arbitration/ applications-police/ applications-public employeesCall Number: ODS, P 4068Notes: An unpublished paper. (Available from Department of Defense Polygraph Insitute).

510.	---. The polygraph shield. Personnel Administrator. 1989; 34(2):18-19, 21, 23.Rec #: 6364Keywords: constitutional rights/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6364, 9903

511.	Nardini, William. The Polygraph technique: An overview. Journal of Police Science and Administration. 1987; 15(3):239-249.Rec #: 4079Keywords: polygraph-general/ screening-commercial-law / history/ research-validity/ research-reliability/ admissibility/ law-rights/ psychophysiology-polygraph theoryCall Number: ODS, P 4079Abstract: The apparatus used for testing is described, and the psychophysiological foundations of polygraph testing are discussed. The extent of use of polygraphs by the public and private sectors is delineated, and State licensure and certification requirements are reviewed. A review of research into polygraph validity and reliabilty and factors affecting it covers laboratory, criminal case, and employee studies. Legal issue examined include the right to privacy, the right to avoid self-incrimination, civil rights, and admissibility of polygraph evidence. The legal status of polygraph screening by employers also is discussed. Finally pros and cons of polygraph testing are presented in the context of legal, moral, and reliablility/validity issues. It is concluded that the polygraph technique is valid and reliable when quality instrumentation is used by well-trained and educated examiners of impeccable character. It provides a source of data that is as accurate as such legally admissible evidence as expert and eyewitness testimony and psychiatric and psychological findings. It also provides an effective and relatively inexpensive method for employment screening and reduction of internal theft. 16 references.

512.	National security, polygraph, and information protection. Security Letter. 1984; 14(17, September 4):1-2, part II. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 4091Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 4091

513.	Nedrud, Duane R. Thank God I'm pure. 1962 Aug.Rec #: 4096Keywords: screening-commercial/ question formulation-relevant/ public relationsCall Number: ODS, P 4096Notes: Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners, Chicago, IL

514.	New York jewelers say they will move out if polygraph banned. APA Newsletter. 1977(2, March/April):2.Rec #: 4122Keywords: screening-commercial-jewelers/ legislation-state/ New YorkCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 41-42). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

515.	Nineteen sixty-six: A year of decision for the polygraph. Occupational Hazards. 1965(December):1-3.Rec #: 4145Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-limiting/ legislation/ prohibit/ retail clerks/ congressional hearings/ AFL-CIO/ appropriations/ anti-polygraph laws/ Gallagher's billCall Number: ODS, P 4145

516.	NSASAB study on polygraphy. National Security Agency; 1990 Apr 137 p.Rec #: 8931Keywords: screening-federalCall Number: ODS, P 8931

517.	Nye, David. Son of the polygraph. Across the Board. 1989; 26(6, June):21-25. ISSN: 0147-1554.Rec #: 9365Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ integrity tests/ screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 9365Abstract: Are paper and pencil honesty tests more reliable or fairer in screening job applicants than lie-detector machines? There are no short answers.

518.	O'Brien, Thomas J. A spy's address to Congress. Security Management. 1985 Jul:(Pentagon Corner Column), pp. 16-18.Rec #: 4168Keywords: cases-espionage/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 4168

519.	O'Keefe, Jack A. Background check by polygraph interview a useful tool. Police Chief. 1960; 27(August):5-6, 8.Rec #: 4178Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 4178

520.	O'Leary, John. Polygraphs and police. The Police Chief. 1977; 44(5, May):18.Rec #: 4180Keywords: screening-police/ applications-internal investigations/ law-labor-police/ law-labor-refusalCall Number: ODS, P 4180

521.	O'Leary, Nealis. A criminologist to the rescue. Literary Digest. 1934; 118(14):22.Rec #: 4181Keywords: historical interest-law enforcement/ biographies-Goddard, Calvin/ screening-commercial-theft/ cases-embezzlementCall Number: ODS, P 4181

522.	Office of Personnel Security. Polygraph testing policy for examinees with medical, physical, or emotional conditions: federal polygraph community survey results. 1997 Jul; ACD-SP-004. Rec #: 6923Keywords: security screening/ relevant-irrelevant method/ MGQT/ medical conditionCall Number: ODS, P 6923Notes: Prepared by Advanced Concepts Division Research, Analysis, & Methodology Branch.

523.	Office of Technology Assessment. The use of integrity tests for pre-employment screening. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1990;78 p. Rec #: 4199Keywords: OTA report/ integrity tests/ paper and pencil tests/ screening-preemploymentCall Number: Library, 658.311 Us2

524.	Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. Review of the Defense Department's polygraph test and research programs. 1987 Mar 3052 p.Rec #: 4198Keywords: OTA report/ validity/ research/ utilityl/ surveys-U.S. Government/ regulations/ screening-government/ researchCall Number: ODS P 4198

525.	Oglesby, Thomas W. The use of emotional screening in the selection of police applicants. Police. 1958; 2(3, January/February):49-53. ISSN: 0032-2563.Rec #: 4203Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 4203

526.	Olch, Francee. The role of lie detection tests in employee selection and company security. The Canadian Manager. 1976; 1(3):9-11.Rec #: 4215Keywords: screening-commercial-Canada/ CanadaCall Number: ODS, P 4215

527.	Oldham, Charles C. Police forum: Subject: The polygraph. The Police Chief. 1961(August):14.Rec #: 6828Keywords: screening/ preemployment screening/ detection of deception/ accuracyCall Number: ODS, P 6828

528.	Orlansky, Jesse. An assessment of lie detection capability. 1962 Jul 31; 62-16. Rec #: 7105Keywords: validity/ reliability/ criminal investigations/ legal status/ applications-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7105

529.	Orne, Martin T. (Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia). Testimony of Martin T. Orne. Hearings before the Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, Committee on the Judiciary, 95th Congress, 1st and 2nd Sessions. On S. 1845, Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection Act; 1978 Sep 19Washington, DC: GPO; 1977: 386-389, 414-415, 421-425, 427-428. Rec #: 4240Keywords: legislation-federal/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4240

530.	Ostrovsky, Robert A. Testimony of Robert A. Ostrovsky, Gaming Industry Association of Nevada, Inc. and Nevada Resort Association. Hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human ResourcesWashington, DC: GPO; 1983 Apr 23.Rec #: 4243Keywords: screening-commercial-Nevada/ licensing-Nevada/ utility-gaming industry/ surveys-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 4243

531.	Outlaw lie detector tests? U.S. News and World Report. 1978; 84(February):45-46.Rec #: 4250Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ Bayh, Birch/ Kelley, TyCall Number: ODS, P 4250Notes: [Interviews of Birch Bayh (opposed) and Ty Kelley (for)]

532.	Paper and pencil "truth verification test" finding acceptance in pre-employment screening. Security Letter. 1979; 9(18, September 17):Part 1, 1-2.Rec #: 4263Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ screening-generalCall Number: ODS, P 4263

533.	Paterson, Pat. Legitimate uses for polygraph tests. APA Newsletter. 1986; 19(3):15-16.Rec #: 4279Keywords: screening-commercial-drug industry/ McKesson CorporationCall Number: Library

534.	Paterson, Richard D. In favor of the polygraph. Security Management. 1985; 29(11):47-52.Rec #: 4281Keywords: screening-commercial-drug industryCall Number: ODS, P 4281

535.	---. Statement of Richard D. Paterson, on behalf of the National Wholesale Druggists' Association. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities of the House Committee on Education and Labor Washington, DC: GPO; 1985 Jul 30.Rec #: 4282Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-commercial-pharmacies/ utility-drug industry/ National Wholesale Druggists' AssociationCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in Polygraph, 14, 230-235.

536.	Pease, Philip T. Statement of Philip T. Pease, Director of Security, National Security Agency. Hearing before the Investigations Subcommittee of the House Committee on Armed Services, 98th Congress, 2nd Session, on H.R. 4681Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Sep 6: 106-117. Rec #: 4305Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ Department of Defense-polygraph programs/ surveys-statistical-counterintelligence/ National Security Agency/ screening-NSA/ legislation-federalCall Number: ODS, P 4305, Library 351.1325 Un3hNotes: Relating to the administration of polygraph examinations and prepublication review requirements by federal agencies

537.	Pentagon commission advises stronger security measures. Security Systems Digest. 1985; 16(26, December 23):9.Rec #: 4313Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ screening-federal/ Stilwell Commission/ applications-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 4313

538.	Pentagon increasing use of polygraph screening exams. Security Systems Digest. 1985; 16(2, January 21):8.Rec #: 4314Keywords: screening-government/ screening-counterintelligence/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 4314

539.	Pentagon plans more polygraph testing. Security World. 1985; 22(March):3-4.Rec #: 4315Keywords: screening-government/ screening-counterintelligence/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 4315

540.	Phannenstill, Richard J. The polygraph passes the test. Security Management. 1983; 27(8):58-60.Rec #: 7241Keywords: applications-screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 7241

541.	Phannenstill, Richard J. and Horvath, Frank S. A comparison of computerized interviewing of job applicants with a personal security interview. Security Journal. 1991; 2(3):172-179.Rec #: 7146Keywords: preemployment screening/ computer interviewing/ employee selection/ personnel selection/ applicant selectionCall Number: ODS, P 7146

542.	Phillips, Erle and Heuttner, Henry A. Polygraph testing. 1986 Apr 17.Rec #: 4350Keywords: law-statutory-legislation/ law-liability/ law-labor/ screening-commercial-convenience storesCall Number: ODS, P 4350Notes: Paper presented at the Labor Relations for the Convenience Store Industry, Legal Symposium, National Association of Convenience Stores

543.	Philly FOB says "no" to polygraph tests. Law Enforcement News. 1980; 6(20):3, 16.Rec #: 4352Keywords: screening-police-Philadelphia/ Fraternal Order of Police-PhiladelphiaCall Number: ODS, P 4352

544.	Philly PC says polygraph exams are needed to restore integrity. Law Enforcement News. 1986; 11(5):3.Rec #: 4353Keywords: applications-screening-law enforcement/ screening-law enforcement/ Philadelphia Police DepartmentCall Number: ODS, P 4353

545.	Poling, James. Invasion by the lie detector. Reader's Digest. 1966; 88(May):109-113.Rec #: 4390Keywords: criticism-screening/ screening-government/ applications-law enforcementCall Number: ODS, P 4390

546.	Polygraph ban angers jewelry manufacturers. Jeweler's Circular-Keystone. 1977(January).Rec #: 4408Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-commercial-jewelers/ screening-commercial-jewelry manufacturersCall Number: ODS, P 4408

547.	Polygraph cuts jewel thefts from 6% to less than 1/2%. APA Newsletter. 1978; 11(5):1.Rec #: 4427Keywords: screening-commercial-jewelers/ surveys-commercial-lossesCall Number: Library

548.	Polygraph examinations are reliable, proven loss control aids, says practitioner. Security Letter. 1986 May 15; 16(10, part I):3. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 4454Keywords: screening-commercial-theftCall Number: ODS, P 4454

549.	Polygraph examinations saves meat packer from financial ruin. APA Newsletter. 1983; 16(1):14.Rec #: 4451Keywords: screening-commercial-Michigan/ cases-food contamination/ Hygrade Food Products-Ball Park FranksCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 42-43). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

550.	Polygraph examinations: The DoD view. 1984 Oct 10(1319, section II).Rec #: 4453Keywords: screening-government/ examiners-training/ history/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 4453Notes: "Security Closeup" of Security Management 1319, Section II, p. 1-4. [Published by the National Foreman's Institute]

551.	Polygraph flunks government agency scrutiny. Corporate Security. 1984; 8(August):7.Rec #: 4459Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 4459

552.	Polygraph foes find new ammunition in release of Congressional Research Memorandum. Security Letter. 1983; 13(24, December 15):1, part I. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 4460Keywords: screening-federal/ screening-Great Britain/ Great BritainCall Number: ODS, P 4460

553.	Polygraph protection act of 1988 (EPPA): Final rules. Polygraph. 1991; 20(2):115-143.Rec #: 8032Keywords: Employee Polygraph Protection Act/ polygraph/ legislation-federal-screening-commercialCall Number: LibraryAbstract: Individual sections define the terms used and explain the exclusion for public-sector employees and the exemptions from the law for national security and defense; employers conducting investigations of economic loss or injury; security firms; and employers authorized to manufacture, distribute, or dispense controlled substnces. The rights of employees receiving polygraph tests under these exemptions are also detailed. Further sections cover recordkeeping, disclosure, enforcement, and administrative proceedings to be used in cases of alleged violations of the law and regulations.

554.	Polygraph subject of Labor Department hearings. [Statements of J. Kirk Barefoot for the APA; Michael Tines and Peter Allstrom for the AFL-CIO; Statement excerpts of James W. Webb for AFL-CIO]. APA Newsletter. 1980; 13(1):1-13.Rec #: 4508Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ American Polygraph Association/ AFL-CIOCall Number: Library

555.	Polygraph test okay, DEA tells NACDS. APA Newsletter. 1977; 3(3):3.Rec #: 4519Keywords: screening-commercial-pharmacies/ Drug Enforcement AdministrationCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 42). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

556.	Polygraph tests. U.S. News and World Report. 1985(February 25):-.Rec #: 4528Keywords: law-labor-Missiouri/ screening-commercial-MissouriCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in APA Newsletter, 18(2), 28. Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 51). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

557.	Polygraph: The defective detective. Human Behavior. 1975(May):48.Rec #: 4532Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism-validityCall Number: ODS, P 4532

558.	Polygraph use by federal government to rise from Walker spy case. Security Letter. 1985; 15(13):1-2.Rec #: 4535Keywords: screening-government/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 4535

559.	Polygraph use continues strong in government - While civilian use comes down under court pressure. Security Letter. 1985; 15(2, part 1).Rec #: 4536Keywords: screening-government/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4536

560.	Polygraph use for employment screening questioned at major science meeting. Security Letter. 1984; 14(11):1-2, part II. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 4539Keywords: screening-commercial/ validity/ techniques-guilty knowledgeCall Number: ODS, P 4539

561.	Polygraph used in bank embezzlement in Hong Kong. APA Newsletter. 1979; 12(2):1-2.Rec #: 4544Keywords: cases-embezzlement-Hong Kong/ screening-commercial-banking/ Hong KongCall Number: Library

562.	Polygraph utility study. Washington, DC: Director of Central Intelligence; 1984 Feb14 p.Rec #: 8982Keywords: screening-personnel securityCall Number: ODS, P 8982Notes: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYAbstract: on file

563.	Polygraphing toll collectors increases revenues dramatically. APA Newsletter. 1980; 13(4):2.Rec #: 4557Keywords: screening-toll collectors/ applications-toll collectors/ utilityCall Number: Library

564.	Polygraphs and employment: A BNA special report. Rockville, MD: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.; 1985; p. -. Rec #: 4560Keywords: screening-federal/ law/ licensing/ statutes/ screening-commercial/ screening-law enforcement/ validity/ OTA reportCall Number: ODS, P 4560

565.	Polygraphs are here to stay, at least in Defense, SFLRP told. Federal News. 1985; 23:1319-1320. ISSN: 0017-260X.Rec #: 4561Keywords: screening-government/ U.S. Department of Defense/ Society of Federal Labor Relations Professionals/ Stilwell, Richard G./ Ansley, NormanCall Number: ODS, P 4561

566.	Polygraphs in employment - Part I: Statutory regulations of usage and examiners. Government Employee Relations Report. 1985; 23:1085-1086. ISSN: 0017-260X.Rec #: 4564Keywords: validity/ screening-commercial/ law-limiting-state/ psychological stress evaluatorCall Number: ODS, P 4564Notes: [BNA, Inc.]Abstract: on file

567.	Polygraphs in employment - Part II: Non-Defense Department use in the federal government. Government Employee Relations Report. 1985; 23:1125-1127. ISSN: 0017-260X.Rec #: 4565Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 4565Notes: [BNA, Inc.]

568.	Polygraphs in employment - Part III: National security vs. employee rights at DoD. Government Employee Relations Report. 1985; 23:1161-1163. ISSN: 0017-260X.Rec #: 4567Keywords: screening-government/ Department of Defense/ national securityCall Number: ODS, P 4567Notes: [BNA, Inc.]

569.	Polygraphs in employment - Part IV: Review of state and federal case law. Government Employee Relations Report. 1985; 23:1193-1197. ISSN: 0017-260X.Rec #: 4568Keywords: screening-government/ case law-federal/ case law-stateCall Number: ODS, P 4568Notes: [BNA, Inc.]

570.	Polygraphs in employment - Part V: The experts debate the issues. Government Employee Relations Report. 1985; 23:1228-1231. ISSN: 0017-260X.Rec #: 4566Keywords: screening-employment/ criticism-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 4566Notes: [BNA, Inc.]

571.	Polygraphs: The dispute continues. Corporate Security. 1985(March):3, 6.Rec #: 4572Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4572

572.	Pompian, Lillian. Business turns to the lie detector. Kiwanis Magazine. 1962; 44(December/January 1963 ):55-60.Rec #: 4577Keywords: screening-theft/ screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 4577

573.	Pre-employment form: How safe is it? Security World. 1976; 13(5):20-21, 99.Rec #: 4600Keywords: screening-commercial-forms/ law-labor-EEOC/ Equal Employment Opportunity Commission-applicant formsCall Number: ODS, P 4600

574.	Pre-employment polygraph test solves murder. APA Newsletter. 1988; 21(1):11.Rec #: 4602Keywords: cases-homicide/ screening-commercial-cases-homicideCall Number: Library

575.	Pre-employment screening: Coors replaces polygraph with a battery of tests. Security Letter. 1987; 17(1, January 5):Part I. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 4603Keywords: screening-commercial-discontinued/ screening-commercial/ Coors IndustriesCall Number: ODS, P 4603

576.	Pre-employment screening: Polygraph apparently out as committee agrees on measures. Security Letter. 1988; 18(11, June 1):part I. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 4604Keywords: legislation-federal-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4604

577.	Pre-employment tests disclose high percentage of drug use. APA Newsletter. 1986; 19(3):10.Rec #: 4605Keywords: surveys-drug use/ screening-commercial-drug useCall Number: Library

578.	President orders tighter handling of government classified data. Security Letter. 1983; 13(6, March 15):Part I. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 4612Keywords: screening-government/ applications-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 4612

579.	President orders wider use of the polygraph in counterintelligence matters. APA Newsletter. 1985; 18(6):9.Rec #: 4613Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ screening-governmentCall Number: Library

580.	President Reagan's remarks on leaks and lie detectors. APA Newsletter. 1982; 15(1):8-9.Rec #: 4616Keywords: cases-national security/ screening-government/ quotations/ applications-national securityCall Number: Library

581.	Press, Aric and Namuth, Tessa. First the lie detector, then the chemicals. Newsweek. 1986; 107(2, January 27):55-56.Rec #: 4618Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4618

582.	Price, Carroll S. An instrumental approach to applicant evaluation. Police. 1961; 5(5, May/June):39-42. ISSN: 0032-2563.Rec #: 4624Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 4624

583.	Prior, Leroy E. Polygraph testing of Vermont State Police applicants . Polygraph. 1985; 14(3):256-257.Rec #: 4629Keywords: screening-police-Vermont/ surveys-police/ Vermont State Police/ screening-police-costCall Number: Library

584.	Prokasy, William F.Letter To: Unknown. 3 p.Rec #: 9039Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ validity/ legislation-stateCall Number: ODS, P 9039Notes: [Pertains to employee screening and the polygraph]

585.	Properly administered polygraph said necessary to protect innocent. Spotlight. 1987; 13(51, December 21):15-17.Rec #: 4641Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-police/ American Polygraph AssociationCall Number: ODS, P 4641

586.	Protecting the fourth arm. The Times. 1983:(November 30).Rec #: 4647Keywords: applications-counterintelligence-Great Britain/ screening-Great Britain/ Great Britain/ cases-espionage-Great BritainCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in APA Newsletter, 17(1), 26-27. Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 45-46). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

587.	Pumphrey, Janet K. Americans with Disabilities Act; The bill, debate, passage, and the future: A bibliography. Polygraph. 1992; 21(1):74-77.Rec #: 4664Keywords: ADA/ law/ screeningCall Number: Library

588.	Putnam, Richard L. Polygraph screening of police applicants: Necessity or abuse? Polygraph. 1978; 7(4):257-262.Rec #: 4666Keywords: screening-police/ surveys-statistical-police applicants/ cases-screening-admissions/ Washoe County Sheriff's OfficeCall Number: Library

589.	Pyle, Christopher H. Statement of Christopher H. Pyle. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights, House Committee of the Judiciary on the Defense Department's polygraph regulations of 1982 Washington, DC: GPO; 1982 Dec 9.Rec #: 4669Keywords: regulations-Department of Defense/ screening-government/ criticism-civil rights/ law-constitutional/ U.S. Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 4669

590.	Radabaugh, Barbara M. The polygraph: A tool for personnel screening. 1985 May 29.Rec #: 4683Keywords: screening-federalCall Number: ODS, P 4683Notes: Unpublished manuscript.

591.	Rafilson, Fred M. Temporal stability of a preemployment integrity test. Psychological Reports. 1989; 65:1384-1386.Rec #: 7012Keywords: preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7012

592.	Rapoport, Daniel. To tell the truth. The Washingtonian. 1984; 19 (5, February):71-80.Rec #: 4711Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 4711

593.	---. Truth or consequences. The National Journal. 1984(March 3):429.Rec #: 4712Keywords: applications-general/ screening-government/ legislation-federal-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4712

594.	Raskin, David C. Comparison of polygraph examinations in criminal justice and personnel selection. Polygraph. 1980; 9(1):3-16.Rec #: 4720Keywords: screening-general/ validity/ techniques-comparedCall Number: Library

595.	---. Does science support polygraph testing? In: Gale, Anthony, Editor. The polygraph test: Lies, truth and science. London: Sage Publications; 1988; pp. 96-110. Rec #: 9041Keywords: scientific approach to lie-detection/ research/ criticism-screening-preemployment/ screening-federal-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 9041, Library 363.254 P76

596.	---. Science and the polygraph profession. Texas Association of Polygraph Examiners Newsletter. 1979(December):3-7.Rec #: 4719Keywords: examiners-general/ criticism-screening/ examiners-trainingCall Number: ODS, P 4719

597.	---. Statement of David C. Raskin. Hearing before the Senate Labor and Human Resources Committee, on S. 1815, The Polygraph Protection Act of 1985Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23: 56-87. Rec #: 4731Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ criticism-screening/ hearings-federal-EPPA/ theory-base rateCall Number: ODS, P 4731

598.	---. Statement of David C. Raskin before the House of Commons, Employment Committee, Session-1983/1984. The implications for industrial relations and employment of the introduction of the polygraph. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 1984 Jun 20; pp. 30-55. Rec #: 4728Keywords: techniques-compared/ validity/ screening-commercial/ Great Britain/ screening-national security/ ethics/ examiners-trainingCall Number: ODS, P 4728, Library 331.0941 G79i

599.	---. Testimony of David C. Raskin. Hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Senate Committee of the Judiciary, on S. 1845, Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection ActWashington, DC: GPO; 1978 Sep 19: 428-449. Rec #: 4723Keywords: screening-general/ criticism-screening/ screening-commercial/ history/ reliability/ voice stress analysis/ techniques-CQT/ validity/ admissibilityCall Number: ODS, P 4723, Library 342.73 Un3

600.	Reagan administration testing wider use of polygraph examination. Security Letter. 1981; 11(21):2-3.Rec #: 4755Keywords: screening-government/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 4755

601.	Reagan restricts classified government information. Security World. 1983; 20(6):4.Rec #: 4757Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 4757

602.	Reagan signs secret directive ordering mandatory polygraphs for top government officials. Security Systems Digest. 1985; 16(26):8-9.Rec #: 4761Keywords: applications-national security/ applications-counterintelligence/ screening-government/ National Security Decision Directive No. 84Call Number: ODS, P 4761

603.	Reali, Silvestro F. Does the polygraph belong in business? Security World. 1977; 14(1, January):24-25.Rec #: 4763Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 4763

604.	Reed, Sheila. A new psychophysiological detection of deception examination for security screening. Psychophysiology. 1994; 31(Supplement 1, August):S80.Rec #: 4774Keywords: TES/ PLC/ DLCQ/ validity/ applications-screeningCall Number: LibraryNotes: [abstract]

605.	---. Psychophysiological detection of deception - Single test interview. 1995 Feb 16.Rec #: 6538Keywords: STI/ CNP/ security screening/ counter narcoticsCall Number: LibraryNotes: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Science, Seattle, WA

606.	Reid, John E. Professionalization in lie detection. 1961 Dec.Rec #: 4793Keywords: examiners-professionalism/ ethics/ screening-commercial/ law-labor/ training-basic/ law-licensingCall Number: ODS, P 4793 Notes: Paper presented at the 8th annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners. Printed in Newsletter of the Academy for Scientific Interrogation, p. 1-3.

607.	Reid, John E. and Hunter, Fred L. Eliminating your silent partners. American Automatic Merchandiser. 1970(April):25-28.Rec #: 4811Keywords: screening-investigations/ honesty/ Reid report/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 4811

608.	Reid survey. APA Newsletter. 1980; 13(5):5.Rec #: 4814Keywords: Reid survey/ paper and pencil tests/ screening-commercialCall Number: Library

609.	Report of the Working Group on the use of the polygraph in criminal investigation and personnel screening. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society. 1986; 39(March):81-94.Rec #: 4837Keywords: British Psychological Society/ criticism-validity/ Great BritainCall Number: ODS, P 4837

610.	Report on polygraph usage in chain drug stores. National Association of Chain Drug Stores, Inc. Polygraph. 1978; 7(1):49-52.Rec #: 4838Keywords: screening-commercial-pharmacies/ surveys-pharmacies/ utility-pharmaciesCall Number: ODS, P 4838, Library

611.	Research Division Staff. A comparison of psychophysiological detection of deception accuracy rates obtained using the counterintelligence scope Polygraph and the test for espionage and sabotage question formats. Fort McClellan, AL: Department of Defense Polygraph Institute; 1995 Jun; DoDPI93-P-0044. 64 p.Rec #: 9964Keywords: TES/ security screening/ DLC/ directed lie control/ psychophysiological detection of deception/ PDD/ espionage/ sabotage/ polygraphCall Number: ODS, P 9964, Library 327.12 R23cNotes: DTIC AD Number A319333

612.	--. Psychophysiological detection of deception accuracy rates obtained using the test for espionage and sabotage. Fort McClellan, AL : Department of Defense Polygraph Institute; 1995 Jun; DODPI94-R-0009. 47.Rec #: 6995Keywords: TES/ security screening/ DLC/ directed lie control/ detection of deception/ espionage/ PDDCall Number: ODS, P 6995Notes: DTIC AD #A330774

613.	Rigby, D. Aspects of polygraph utilization in private enterprise. 1974.Rec #: 4869Keywords: screening-commercial/ validity/ privacy/ law-constitutional rights/ law-limitingCall Number: ODS, P 4869Notes: Unpublished manuscript, University of Utah.

614.	Riley, Paul T. The use of the polygraph for pre-employment testing of police recruits. Police. 1961; 5(6):42-43.Rec #: 4876Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 4876

615.	Ritter, Joe. Use of the polygraph in public personnel decisions. 1987 May 112.Rec #: 7310Keywords: preemployment screening/ voice-quality/ PSE/ accuracy/ criminologyCall Number: ODS, P 7310, 9903

616.	Robber kept off police force by polygraph examination. APA Newsletter. 1981; 14(6):6.Rec #: 4880Keywords: cases-robbery/ screening-policeCall Number: Library

617.	Robbins, E. L. Loss prevention by selection of personnel. Industrial Security. 1965; 9:2.Rec #: 4882Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 4882

618.	Role of the polygraph in law enforcement personnel discipline. Defense Manual. 1984(Brief 84-2):1-51.Rec #: 4905Keywords: law-labor-police/ screening-police/ applications-internal investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 4905

619.	Rollins, Norma. Polygraph testing: The pros and cons: The case against lie detectors. Management Review. 1986; 75(1, January):61-62.Rec #: 4906Keywords: screening/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P 4906

620.	Romig, Clarence H. A. Does the polygraph invade the mind? Security Management. 1973(March):16-18.Rec #: 4916Keywords: screening-generalCall Number: ODS, P 4916

621.	---. How to improve police selection with the polygraph. Outpost. 1973(July):15-17, 31-33.Rec #: 4917Keywords: South Africa/ screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 4917

622.	---. Improving police selection with the polygraph. Polygraph. 1972; 1(4):207-220.Rec #: 4915Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: Library

623.	Rouke, Fabian L. Psychology of the retail criminal. Police. 1960(March/April):28-32. ISSN: 0032-2563.Rec #: 4960Keywords: screening-commercial/ psychology-criminalsCall Number: ODS, P 4960

624.	Ruse, Deanna. How to successfully pass a lie detector test! Santa Barbara, CA: Accurate Polygraph; 1983. Rec #: 4989Keywords: screening-descriptiveCall Number: ODS, P 4989

625.	Sack, M. Frank. Applicant's attitude and suggestions toward a pre-employment security polygraph examination. nd.Rec #: 5001Keywords: surveys-attitude/ screening-preemployment/ applicantsCall Number: ODS, P 5001Notes: Unpublished manuscript, 5 p.

626.	Sackett, Paul R. Honesty testing for personnel selection: Assessing the validity of "paper and pencil" test. Personnel Administrator. 1985; 30(9, September):67-70, 72, 74, 76, 121. ISSN: 0031-5729.Rec #: 5008Keywords: paper and pencil tests/ screening-commercial-paper and pencil tests/ validity-paper and pencil tests/ law-EEOCCall Number: ODS, P 5008

627.	Sackett, Paul R. and Decker, Phillip J. Detection of deception in the employment context: A review and critical analysis. Personnel Psychology. 1979; 32:487-506.Rec #: 5010Keywords: screening-employment/ criminal investigations/ validity/ law-EEOC/ voice stress/ paper and pencil tests/ countermeasures/ examiners-trainingCall Number: ODS, P 5010

628.	Safeguarding national security information. 1983 Mar 11; National Security Decision Directive No. 84. Rec #: 5014Keywords: applications-national security/ National Security Decision Directive No. 84/ screening-government/ regulations-NSDD 84Call Number: Library 353.0819 Un3n

629.	Samuels, Dorothy J. What if the lie detector lies? The Nation. 1983; 237(18):566, 568.Rec #: 5034Keywords: screening-government/ legislation-federalCall Number: ODS, P 5034

630.	Sanoff, Alvin P. Reagan's drive to plug news leaks. U.S. News and World Report. 1983(November 14):32.Rec #: 5037Keywords: screening-government/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 5037

631.	Sauser, William I., Jr.; Hornsby, Jeffrey S., and Benson, Philip G. Psychometric characteristics of a pre employment screening device. Psychological Reports. 1988; 63:971-977.Rec #: 5043Keywords: screening-preemployment/ paper and pencil tests/ research-paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 5043

632.	Saxe, Leonard. Presentation of Leonard Saxe . 1987 Feb 18.Rec #: 5052Keywords: screening-government/ criticism-generalCall Number: ODS, P 5052Notes: Annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago, IL

633.	---. The science of lie detection - a commentary. New Jersey Law Journal. 1984(March 29).Rec #: 7521Keywords: screening-national security/ validity-criticismCall Number: ODS, P 7521

634.	---. Statement of Leonard Saxe, Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities, House Committee on Education and Labor, on use of polygraph tests in the workplace Washington, DC: GPO; 1985 Jul 30.Rec #: 5049Keywords: criticism-screening-commercial/ criticism-validity/ countermeasuresCall Number: ODS, P 5049

635.	---. Statement of Leonard Saxe. Hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, on Polygraph tests in the workplace Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23: 144-160. Rec #: 5050Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ criticism/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 5050

636.	Saxe, Leonard; Dougherty, Denise, and Cross, Theodore P. The validity of polygraph testing: scientific analysis and public controversy. American Psychologist. 1985; 40(3, March):355-366.Rec #: 5055Keywords: OTA report/ validity-field examinations/ validity-laboratory/ reliability/ surveys-polygraph/ validity/ applications-national security/ screening-federal/ legislation-federal/ criticism/ scientific analysisCall Number: ODS, P 5055Abstract: A major conclusion is that polygraph testing is a complex process that varies widely in application. While the polygraph instrument itself is essentially the same for all applications, the purpose of the examination, type of individual tested,examiner training, setting of the examination, and type of questions asked, among other factors, can differ substantially. The instrument itself cannot detect deception; therefore, the polygraph test requires the examiner to develop questions for each case, compare the physiological response (as measured by the instrument) to the different questions, and infer deception or truthfulness based on these comparisons. A second major conclusion is that no overall measure or single statistic of polygraph validity can be established based on available scientific evidence. The amount and quality of the evidence depends on the particular application. Therefore, conclusion about polygraph validity can only be made in the context of specific applications. The types of applications discussed are specific-issue criminal investigation, specific-issue screening investigation, and personnel security screening, including preemployment or preclearance, an aperiodic. Tabular data and 204 references are provided.

637.	Schaefer, John T. Polygraph and the private sector. The Academy Journal. 1981; 4(2):2, 5.Rec #: 5064Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5064

638.	Scheve, William J., Jr. Testimony of William J. Scheve, Jr., President of the American Polygraph Association. Hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources CommitteeWashington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 239.Rec #: 5077Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5077, 9903

639.	---. Testimony of William J. Scheve, Jr., President of the American Polygraph Association. Hearing before the Employment Opportunities Subcommittee of the House Committee on Education and Labor Washington, DC: GPO; 1987 Apr 30.Rec #: 5078Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ American Polygraph Association/ screening-commercial/ law-labor-rights/ surveys-subjectsCall Number: LibraryNotes: APA Newsletter, 20(3), 12-20.

640.	Schofield, Daniel L. Hiring standards: Ensuring fitness for duty. Polygraph. 1993; 22(4):323-331.Rec #: 5089Keywords: screening-preemployment-standardsCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted from FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 1993, Nov., 62(11), 27-31.Abstract: Discusses pre-employment screening standards, including polygraph.

641.	Schroeder, PatriciaLetter To: Letter to Congressman William D. Ford. On H.R. 4681, Federal Polygraph Limitation and Anti-Censorship Act. 1984 Mar 20.Rec #: 5101Keywords: applications-national security/ screening-government/ legislation-federal/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 5101

642.	---. 1984 at Coors: Polygraphs on demand. Congressional Record. 1977(September 20):E5709.Rec #: 5100Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5100

643.	Schurr, Robert G. Management of the corporate security program. Security Management. 1975; 19(2):14-21.Rec #: 5104Keywords: screening-commercial/ voice stress analysis/ PSECall Number: ODS, P 5104

644.	Screening test solves an old murder. APA Newsletter. 1980; 13(1):26.Rec #: 5122Keywords: cases-homicide/ cases-screening-homicide/ nuclear power plant-screeningCall Number: Library 363.254 J98Notes: Reprinted in N. Ansley & J. Pumphrey (Eds.), Justice and the polygraph (p. 53). Severna Park, MD: American Polygraph Association.

645.	Security Closeup: Rebuttal from a polygraph professional. Security Management. 1988; 1706(Section II):March 25.Rec #: 5133Keywords: screening-commercial/ labor-law/ cases-screening-commercial/ ethicsCall Number: ODS, P 5133

646.	Service, Gregory. Keeping out of court. Security Management. 1990; 34(7):11A-12A.Rec #: 6300Keywords: applications-screening/ criminal investigations/ background investigations/ qualificationsCall Number: ODS, P 6300, 9903

647.	Sherwood, Larry. Testimony of Larry Sherwood, on behalf of Jewelers of America and Manufacturing Jewelers & Silversmiths of America [with appendices from Zales, Gordons & Sherwood Management on actual cases involving the polygraph]. Hearing before the House Employment Opportunities Subcommittee, Committee on Education and Labor Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Jul 30.Rec #: 5183Keywords: screening-commercial-jewelers/ cases-theft/ legislation-federal-commercialCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in Polygraph, 14, 243-251.

648.	Shoop, Julie G. First Job-Applicant Suit Under Lie-Detector Law. Trial. 1990; 26(7):99, 101.Rec #: 9918Keywords: EPPA/ screening-employmentCall Number: ODS, P 9918

649.	Siatt, Wayne. What companies are doing about employee screening and testing. Security World. 1983(April):29-36.Rec #: 5195Keywords: screening-employment/ surveys/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 5195

650.	Siegel, Jay S. Detecting the lie in polygraph laws. New England Business. 1982; 4(4):39-40.Rec #: 5199Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5199

651.	Silas, Faye A. Lie box battle: Workers challenge polygraph. ABA Journal. 1984; 70(February):34-35. ISSN: 0747-0088.Rec #: 3329Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-labor/ law-limitingCall Number: ODS, P 3329

652.	Silverberg, Ben A. Attitudes of job applicants and employees toward the polygraph. Polygraph. 1980; 9(3, September):162-169.Rec #: 5206Keywords: surveys-attitude/ applicants/ employees/ screening-preemployment/ screening-periodicCall Number: ODS, P 5206, LibraryNotes: file

653.	---. Attitudes of job applicants toward the Arther security clearance examination. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1980; 14(6, May):1-4.Rec #: 5207Keywords: surveys-attitude/ applicants/ screening-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 5207

654.	---. Employee attitudes toward periodic polygraph examinations. Journal of Polygraph Science. 1981; 15(4, January-February):1-4.Rec #: 5209Keywords: surveys-attitudes-employees/ screening-commercial-periodic/ CanadaCall Number: ODS, P 5209

655.	Skallerup, Walter T. Jr., Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Security Policy. Testimony of Walter T. Skallerup, Jr. Hearing before the Foreign Operations and Government Information Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, 89 Congress, 1st Session; 1965 Aug 19Washington, D. C.: GPO; 1965610-613.Rec #: 9921Keywords: security screening/ witnessesCall Number: Library, 351.1325 Un3uNotes: Use of Polygraphs as "Lie Detectors" by the Federal Government. Part 6- Testimony of Department of Defense Witnesses.

656.	Skousen, W. Cleon. What about examinations for police personnel? Law and Order. 1961; 9(7, July):44-47, 77.Rec #: 5229Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 5229

657.	Slawson, H. H. When science polices business. Nation's Business. 1937; 25(February):54, 57, 60. ISSN: 0028-047x.Rec #: 5236Keywords: historical interest-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 5236

658.	Slowik, Stanley M. Ethics in pre-employment polygraph examinations. Polygraph. 1979; 8(2):144-149.Rec #: 5242Keywords: screening-preemployment/ ethicsCall Number: ODS, P 5242, Library

659.	---. Pressures in today's workplace. Vol. III; statement of Stanley M. Slowik, Director, John E. Reid & Associates. Oversight hearings before the Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations, of the House Committee on Education and LaborWashington, DC: GPO; 1979 Dec 15: 55-69, 355-447 . Rec #: 5243Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ validity/ field examinations/ reliability/ John E. Reid & AssociatesCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 10, 194-211

660.	Smith, Carl. Frequency of admissions of male and female police officers. nd.Rec #: 5253Keywords: screening-police/ surveys/ admissionsCall Number: ODS, P 5253Notes: Unpublished manuscript

661.	Sosnowski, Daniel E. Curbing employee theft: How firms do it. Security Management. 1985; 29(9, September):109-112.Rec #: 5290Keywords: screening-commercial-theft/ paper and pencil testsCall Number: ODS, P 5290

662.	Sources on lie detection. Systems, Technology and Science for Law Enforcement and Security. 1978; 9(10):10-11.Rec #: 5291Keywords: bibliographies/ Reid Report/ paper and pencil tests-Reid report/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 5291

663.	Spokane commissioner says polygraph invaluable. APA Newsletter. 1987; 20(6):13.Rec #: 5307Keywords: Spokane County Civil Service Commission/ applications-screening-law enforcement/ screening-policeCall Number: Library

664.	State of Michigan. Enrolled House Bill No. 4402. State of Michigan, 81st Legislature, Regular Session of 1982; 1982.Rec #: 6800Keywords: polygraph examinations/ PSE/ preemployment screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6800Abstract: An ACT to prohibit employers and employment agencies from requiring polygraph examinations of employees and applicants for employment; to prohibit employers and employment agencies from discriminating against employees and applicants for employment because they refuse or decline to take a polygraph examination; to provide that an employer or employment agency shall not take any action against an employee because of an alleged or actual opinion that an employee did not tell the truth during a polygraph examination; to regulate the use of polygrap examinations by employers and employment agencies; to regulate the administration of polygraph examinations to employees and applicants for employment; and to provide remedies and penalties for violations of this act.

665.	Stephens, Elvis C. Polygraphs? Pros and cons. Personnel Administrator. 1971(January/February):23-27.Rec #: 5344Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5344

666.	---. The use of polygraph by business firms in Texas. Business Studies. 1967(Fall):65-73.Rec #: 5343Keywords: screening-commercial-TexasCall Number: ODS, P 5343

667.	---. The value of pre-employment polygraph examinations. The Journal of Polygraph Studies. 1969; 3(4, January-February).Rec #: 7089Keywords: applications-preemployment/ preemployment screening/ pretest interviewCall Number: ODS, P 7089

668.	Sternbach, Richard A. The lie detector. Science. 1964; 144, June 5:1177.Rec #: 5355Keywords: criticism-screeningCall Number: ODS, P 5355

669.	Stevenson, Thomas M. Polygraph statistics. 1962 Aug.Rec #: 5361Keywords: screening-commercial-statistics/ surveys-statisticalCall Number: ODS, P 5361Notes: Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners

670.	Stilwell, Richard G. Polygraph policies: Protecting the interests of the individual ... and the nation. Defense. 1984(January):9-13.Rec #: 5375Keywords: screening-government/ regulations-federal/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 5375

671.	---, Deptuy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, U. S. Department of Defense. Statement of General Richard G. Stilwell, USA [Ret.]. Hearing before Legislation and National Security Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, 19 Oct 83; 1983 Oct 19Washington, D. C.; 198312.Rec #: 9929Keywords: security screening/ leaksCall Number: ODS, P 9929

672.	---. Statement of General Richard G. Stilwell, USA (Ret). Hearing before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Senate Committee on Government Affairs Washington, DC: GPO; 1985 Apr 25.Rec #: 5379Keywords: utility-federal/ applications-national security/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 5379, LibraryNotes: Printed in Polygraph, 14, 118-125.

673.	---. Statement of General Richard G. Stilwell, USA (Ret), Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Hearing before the House Subcommittee on Civil Services, on H.R. 4681 Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Feb 29.Rec #: 5376Keywords: screening-government/ legislation-federal/ Department of Defense/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 5376

674.	---. Statement of Richard G. Stilwell, USA (Ret), Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights, House Committee on the Judiciary Washington, DC: GPO; 1982 Dec 9.Rec #: 5374Keywords: screening-government/ regulations-Department of Defense/ Department of Defense/ applications-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 5374Notes: Printed in APA Newsletter, 15(6), 2-5

675.	---. Testimony of General Richard G. Stilwell, USA (Ret), Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. Hearing before the Senate Committee on Armed Services, on polygraphs for counterintelligence purposes in the Department of DefenseWashington, DC: GPO; 1984 Mar 7: 3-43. Rec #: 5377Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ Department of Defense-polygraph programs/ screening-federal-DoDCall Number: ODS, P 5377

676.	Stilwell, Richard G. and Brooks, Jack. Use lie detectors on defense workers? U.S. News and World Report. 1985; 98(February 25):44.Rec #: 5382Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ applications-national security/ screening-federal/ screening-government/ Brooks, Jack/ Stilwell, Richard G.Call Number: ODS, P 5382

677.	Suffridge, James A. The silent assault on the right to privacy. AFL-CIO American Federationist. 1965(August):1-6.Rec #: 5407Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism-privacy/ AFL-CIOCall Number: ODS, P 5407

678.	Sulich, Ingrid. Increased use of drug and truth tests: American authorities and firms test workers and applicants. Beliner Morgenpost. 1986 May 25:-.Rec #: 5408Keywords: screening-commercial/ Federal Republic of GermanyCall Number: LibraryNotes: Translated by Gordon Barland and reprinted in APA Newsletter, 19(4), 25-26.

679.	Sullenberger, Tom E. Is the polygraph suited to pre-employment screening? Security Management. 1985; 29(8):44-48.Rec #: 5409Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ examiners-privateCall Number: ODS, P 5409

680.	Sullivan, RitaLetter To: Ronald Lango. 1986 Jul 10. 3.Rec #: 6756Keywords: drugs-test data analysis/ drug screeningCall Number: ODS, P 6756

681.	Sutor, David. The gray flannel couch: The lie detector in business. U.S. Catholic. 1964(July):6-11.Rec #: 5434Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5434

682.	Swank, Calvin J. and Haley, Keith N. The objections to polygraph screening of police applicants. The Police Chief. 1972; 39(6, June):73-76.Rec #: 5475Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 5475

683.	Swanson, Charles R. Benefits of a sworn polygraph examiner. 19842.Rec #: 3132Keywords: confessions/ preemployment screening/ interrogation/ admissibility/ evidence/ licensing-CaliforniaCall Number: ODS, P 3132, 9903

684.	Taft, William H.IV, Deputy Secretary of Defense. DoD Polygraph Program. Department of Defense Directive Number 5210.48. Washington, DC: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy; 1984 Dec 248 p.Rec #: 2939Keywords: regulations-Department of Defense/ applications-counterintelligence/ screening-Department of Defense/ Department of Defense/ policyCall Number: ODS, P 2939, LibraryNotes: See also Report No.: DOD-5210.48-R, Jan 85, NTIS No. AD-A154 037/6/XAB, Record #1373

685.	---. Statement of William H. Taft, IV, General Counsel, Department of Defense. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights, House Committee on the Judiciary Washington, DC: GPO; 1982 Dec 9.Rec #: 5492Keywords: screening-government/ regulations-Department of Defense/ applications-national security/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in APA Newsletter, 15(6), 5-7

686.	Talley, Lawrence W. Testimony of Lawrence W. Talley for Days Inns of America. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities of the House Committee on Education and Labor Washington, DC: GPO; 1985 Sep 18.Rec #: 5498Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ Days Inns of AmericaCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in Polygraph, 14, 236-238

687.	Terris, William. Attitudinal correlates of employee integrity. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 1985; 1(March):60-68.Rec #: 5524Keywords: subjects-attitudes-theft/ screening-commercial-theft rates/ cases-theft/ research-validity/ research-validity-paper and pencil tests/ personnel selection/ London House-Stanton surveysCall Number: ODS, P 5524

688.	Territo, Leonard. The use of polygraph in the pre-employment screening process. Police Chief. 1974; 41(7):51-53.Rec #: 5525Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 5525

689.	Testing the water or walking on water? Guardsmarks requests polygraph in job ad. Security Letter. 1989; 19(11, June 1):part I. ISSN: 0363-4922.Rec #: 5539Keywords: EPPA/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5539

690.	The American Polygraph Association symposium on pre-employment screening. Polygraph. 1980; 9(1):1-33.Rec #: 112Keywords: screening-symposium/ validity-views of psychologists/ techniques-screeningCall Number: Library

691.	The dimensions of privacy - A survey. APA Newsletter. 1980; 13(2):11-12.Rec #: 1434Keywords: surveys-privacy/ screening-commercial-privacyCall Number: Library

692.	The intimidation of job tests. AFL-CIO American Federationist. 1979; 86:1-8. ISSN: 0149-2489.Rec #: 2737Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism-intimidationCall Number: ODS, P 2737

693.	The polygraph as an administrative tool. Legal Points. 1979:-.Rec #: 4406Keywords: law-administrative/ screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 4406Notes: Published by the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Gaithersburg, MD

694.	The Polygraph: Its capabilities and limitations in security clearances. ONI Review. 1951:288-292.Rec #: 4475Keywords: screening-government/ Office of Naval IntelligenceCall Number: ODS, P 4475

695.	The Question: When is such screening legal? Business Week. 1978; 25(20, February 6):100-101.Rec #: 4675Keywords: screening-commercial/ voice stress analysisCall Number: ODS, P 4675

696.	The Science Of Honesty Testing. Security . 1995; 32(3):11.Rec #: 9400Keywords: employees screening/ psychological tests/ honesty testingCall Number: ODS, P 9400

697.	The truth about "lie" detectors. Collective Bargaining Report. 1964.Rec #: 9171Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticismCall Number: ODS, P 9171Notes: Reprinted from AFL-CIO American Federationist, 1964, November

698.	The truth about the polygraph controversy. Security World. 1984; 21(6):11, 13.Rec #: 5643Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5643

699.	The use of polygraphs and similar devices by federal agencies. Polygraph. 1976; 5(1):2-58.Rec #: 5794Keywords: legislation-federal/ applications-counterintelligence/ screening-government/ voice stress/ research-federal/ Abzug, Bella S.Call Number: Library, 353.001325 Un3uNotes: [copy of the report by Bella Abzug's committee--the Government Information and Individual Rights Subcommittee]

700.	The whole truth - An examination of the lie detector. Professional Intelligence Reporter. 1977(July):3-7.Rec #: 6022Keywords: countermeasures/ validity-field examinations/ screening-generalCall Number: ODS, P 6022

701.	Thomas, Ronald J. The polygraph in private industry: Regulation or elimination? Buffalo Law Review. 1965; 15:655-669.Rec #: 5558Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-limiting/ licensingCall Number: ODS, P 5558

702.	Thurber, Steven. CPI variables in relation to the polygraph performance of police officer candidates. The Journal of Social Psychology. 1981; 113:145-146. ISSN: 0022-4545.Rec #: 9621Keywords: countermeasures/ good impression (GI) scale/ screening-preemployment/ police applicantsCall Number: ODS, P 9621Abstract: Administered the California Psychological Inventory (CPI) and a polygraph to 34 male police officers (mean age 23 yrs), of whom 19 were judged unacceptable because of elevated readings in response to questions concerning antisocial behavior, drug usage, and/or criminal involvement. Ss were placed in pass vs fail categories to analyze the extent to which CPI variables differentiated Ss with gross differences in polygraph performance. Results show that Ss who passed the polygraph scored higher on the Good Impression subscale than those who failed, suggesting a connection between social desirability and the capacity to control autonomic processes.

703.	Timm, Howard W. Effect of posthypnotic suggestions on the accuracy of preemployment polygraph testing. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1991; 36(5):1521-1535.Rec #: 5581Keywords: hypnosis/ countermeasures/ idomotor suggestion/ screening-preemployment/ anxiety levelCall Number: ODS,P 5581, Library

704.	Timm, Howard W. and Hedges, W. Keith. Factors theoretically affecting the incidence of deceptive responses during preemployment screening procedures. Polygraph. 1993; 22(3):229.Rec #: 6555Keywords: screening-preemployment/ Inwald Personality Inventory/ paper and pencil tests/ deceptionCall Number: ODS, P 6555, Library

705.	Tiner, Michael. Statement of Michael Tiner, Assistant Director of Government Affairs, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Labor/Management Relations, House Committee on Education and Labor Washington, DC: GPO; 1979 Oct 16.Rec #: 5585Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism-laborCall Number: ODS, P 5585

706.	---. Statement of Michael Tiner, Assistant Director of Government Affairs, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (AFL-CIO). 1984 Dec 12.Rec #: 5586Keywords: criticism/ labor unions/ legislation-Tennessee/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5586Notes: Hearing before the Tennessee State Legislature

707.	Tiner, Michael and Allstrom, Peter. Statement of Michael Tiner and Peter Allstrom, for AFL-CIO. Hearing before the U.S. Department of Labor Washington, DC: GPO; 1980 Jan 28.Rec #: 5587Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ AFL-CIOCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in APA Newsletter, 13(1), 6-13

708.	Tivnan, Edward. Truth and consequences. New York . 1984; 17, March 12(8):49-58. ISSN: 0028-7369.Rec #: 5625Keywords: law-labor-rights/ criticism-civil rights/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5625

709.	Torres, Christopher B. Detection of deception: The use of polygraph as an aid to national security. California State University, Sacramento; 1985.Rec #: 5605Keywords: applications-national security/ dissertations and theses/ screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 5605Notes: Unpublished Master's thesis

710.	Truth or consequences. Time. 1973; 101, March 19(12):73-74.Rec #: 5647Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5647

711.	Truth's scientific ally. Journal of American Insurance. 1965; 41(2, March-April).Rec #: 5649Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5649

712.	Turner, S. E. So who's afraid of a polygraph test? San Antonio, Texas: Naylor Company; 1974; ISBN: 0-8111-0537-7.Rec #: 3321Keywords: preemployment screening/ heart rate/ blood pressureCall Number: ODS, P 3321

713.	U.S. Civil Service Commission. Use of the polygraph in personnel investigation of competitive service applicants and appointees to competitive service positions. 1973(July 9).Rec #: 5734Keywords: regulations-Civil Service Commission/ screening-government/ Civil Service CommissionCall Number: ODS, P 5734Notes: Appendix D, Federal Personnel Manual.

714.	U.S. Congress. The administration's initiatives to expand polygraph use and impose lifelong censorship on thousands of government employees. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1983; Twenty-fifth report, House Report No. 98-578. Rec #: 5754Keywords: screening-government/ applications-counterintelligence/ Department of DefenseCall Number: Library, 363.254 Un3

715.	---. H.R. 4681, Relating to the administration of polygraph examinations and prepublication review requirements by federal agencies. Hearings before the Investigations Subcommittee of the Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives, 98th Congress, 2nd Session Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Sep 6.Rec #: 5755Keywords: screening-government/ applications-national security/ legislation-federal/ Department of Defense/ Central Intelligence Agency/ National Security Agency/ National Security Decision Directive 84Call Number: Library, 351.1325 Un3h

716.	--. The use of polygraphs and similar devices by federal agencies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1976; Thirteenth Report by the Committee on Government Operations together with separate and dissenting views, House Report No. 94-795. Rec #: 5740Keywords: Department of Defense/ applications-federal/ criticism-congressional/ screening-government/ research-laboratory/ voice stress/ regulations-Department of Defense/ examiners-federal/ training-federalCall Number: Library, 353.001325 Un3u

717.	U.S. Congress. House. Polygraphs in the workplace: the use of "lie detectors" in hiring and firing. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities of the Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives , 99th Congress, 1st Session, on H.R. 1524 and H.R. 1924.; 1985 Jul 30; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: GPO; 1986362 p.Rec #: 5750Keywords: legislation-federal-commercial/ screening-commercial-legislation-federalCall Number: Library, 658.3112 Un3pNotes: Serial No. 99-42

718.	U.S. Congress. House. Pre-employment security procedures of the intelligence agencies. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oversight of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, House of Representatives, 96th Congress, 1st Session; 1916 May 17-1979 Jun 21 Washington, DC: GPO; 1979.Rec #: 5753Keywords: screening-government/ applications-counterintelligence/ Department of Defense/ National Security Agency/ Department of Justice/ Central Intelligence Agency/ State Department/ Defense Investigative Service/ Defense Intelligence Agency/ Federal Bureau of Investigation/ Law Enforcement Assistance Administration/ American Civil Liberties Union/ American Polygraph AssociationCall Number: Library, 353.0074 Un3p

719.	U.S. Congress. House. Presidential directive on the use of polygraphs and prepublication review. Hearings before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 98th Congress, 1st and 2nd Sessions. Apr 21, 28, 1983 and Feb. 7, 1984. Washington, DC: GPO; 1985422.Rec #: 5743Keywords: regulations-NSDD 84/ legislation-federal/ screening-government/ examiners-federal/ National Security Decision Directive 84Call Number: Library, 351.1325 Un3pNotes: Hearings held jointly with the Subcommittee on Civil Service. Serial No. 114.Abstract: It requires those with access to Sensitive Compartmented information to sign a nondisclosure agreement that includes a provision for prepublication review (Government review of employee writings prior to publication.) The directive mandates investigations of unauthorized disclosures, and employees can be fired or otherwise disciplined for failing a polygraph test or for refusing to take such a test. Witnesses opposing the directive include a representative of the American Civil Liberties Union, the president of the American Foreign Service association, and counsel to the Authors League of America. Arguments against the directive focus on first amendment intrusions and include the potential for prepublication political censorship, unnecessary limitations on information flow, and the unreliability of polygraph results. Representatives of various Federal agencies support the directive aas a necessary response to the serious problem of security leaks. They maintain that strict procedures prevent political censorship in prepublication reviews and that polygraph tests are used in the context of other investigative evidence. Appended supplementary material.

720.	---. United States counterintelligence and security concerns - 1986. Report by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence House of Representatives; 1987 Feb 4 Washington, DC: GPO; 198721.Rec #: 5756Keywords: screening-governmentCall Number: ODS, P 5756Notes: Report 100-5, Union Calander No. 3

721.	U.S. Congress. House. Use of polygraph as "lie detectors" by the federal government. Tenth Report by the Committee on Government Operations, 89th Congress, 1st Session Washington, DC: GPO; 1965.Rec #: 5737Keywords: screening-government/ validity-laboratory/ surveys-federal/ applications-investigations/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: Library, 351.1325 Un3uNotes: House Report No. 198

722.	---. Use of polygraph as "lie detectors" by the federal government.(Part 2). Thirty-Ninth Report by the Committee on Government Operations, 89th Congress, 2nd Session Washington, DC: GPO; 1966.Rec #: 5738Keywords: screening-government/ validity-laboratory/ surveys-federal/ applications-investigations/ applications-national securityCall Number: ODS, P 5738, 351.1325 Un3uNotes: Thirty-ninth report, House Report No. 2801Abstract: on file

723.	U.S. Congress. House. Use of Polygraph tests by the U.S. Department of Defense. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 97th Congress, 2nd session.; 1982 Dec 9; Washington, DC. Washington, DC: GPO; 198458 p.Rec #: 5742Keywords: applications-counterintelligence/ screening-government/ regulations-Department of Defense/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 5742Notes: Serial No. 110

724.	U.S. Congress. House. The use of polygraphs and similar devices by federal agencies. Hearings before House Committee on Government Operations, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session Washington, DC : GPO; 1974 Jun 4.Rec #: 5739Keywords: applications-national security/ screening-government/ voice analysis-federal view/ research-laboratory/ research-field/ Federal Bureau of Investigation/ National Security Agency/ Central Intelligence Agency/ Civil Service Commission/ Department of JusticeCall Number: ODS, P 5739, Library 353.001325 Un3u

725.	U. S. Congress. House. The use of polygraphs as "lie detectors" by the federal government. Hearings before House Committee on Government Operations, Foreign Operations and Government Information Subcommittee, 88th Congress, 2nd Session Washington, DC: GPO; 1964.Rec #: 5736Keywords: licensing-state/ examiners-private/ techniques/ ethics/ validity-laboratory/ screening-government/ screening-commercial/ applications-national security/ Department of Defense/ U.S. Army CID/ Naval Investigative Service/ Office of Special Investigations-U.S.Air Force/ psychophysiology-theory/ research-laboratory/ applications-investigations/ Postal Inspection Service/ instument-B&W/ validity-field examinations/ research-field/ theory-Orlansky's views/ surveys-federal/ examiners-federal-training/ training-federalCall Number: Library, 351.1325 Un3uNotes: Part I - Panel discussion with private polygraph practitioners. Part II - Testimony of Army, Navy, and Air Force witnesses. Part III - Panel discussion with scientists. Part IV - Testimony of Post Office witnesses. Part V- Testimony of Federal Bureau of Investigation Witnesses. Part VI - Testimony of Department of Defense witnesses.

726.	U.S. Congress, House Committee on Education and Labor, Subcommittee on Labor/Management Relations, 96th Congress, 2nd Session. Pressures in Today's Workplace. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1981. Rec #: 5741Keywords: screening-commercial/ legislation-federalCall Number: ODS, P 5741

727.	U. S. Congress, House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor. Employee Polygraph Protection Act. Report with Minority, Dissenting, Additional, Supplemental Dissenting, and Additional Dissentive Views. Committed to the Committee of the Whole House, 100th Congress, 1st. Session. Washington, D. C.: GPO; 1987 Jul 9; 100-208. 23.Rec #: 9939Keywords: Employee Polygraph Protection Act/ employee screeningCall Number: ODS, P 9939

728.	U.S. Congress. Senate. Polygraph Protection Act of 1985. Hearing before the Committee on Labor and Human Resources, 99th Congress, 2nd Session on S. 1815. 1986 Apr 23 Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 23524 p.Rec #: 5766Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ Employee Polygraph Protection Act/ EPPACall Number: Library, 658.3112 Un3pAbstract: To prevent the denial of employment opportunities by prohibiting the use of lie detectors by employers involved in or affecting interstate commerce.

729.	---. Polygraphs for counterintelligence purposes in the Department of Defense. Hearing before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, 98th Congress, 2nd Session. 1984 Mar 7 Washington, DC: GPO; 1984101.Rec #: 5765Keywords: screening-government/ applications-counterintelligence/ validity-field examinations/ Department of DefenseCall Number: ODS, P 5765Notes: S. Hrg. 98-1081

730.	U. S. Congress. Senate. Statement of L. Britt Snider, Principal Director, Counterintelligence and Security Policy, Office of the Secretary of Defense. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Manpower and Personnel, Senate Committee on the Armed Services Washington, DC: GPO; 1985 Jun 26.Rec #: 5272Keywords: screening-government/ legislation-federal/ applications-counterintelligence Call Number: ODS, P 5272Notes: Printed in Polygraph, 14, 269-275.Abstract: on file

731.	U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on the Constitution. Polygraph Control and Civil Liberties Protection Act. Hearings before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, 95th congress, 1st and 2nd sessions, S. 1845. 1977 Nov 15-1978 Sep 21 Washington, DC: GPO; c1978653 p.Rec #: 5763Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ validity/ voice stress analysis/ PSECall Number: Library, 342.73 Un3Abstract: S. 1845, A bill to protect the rights of individuals guarnateed by the constitution of the United States and to prevent unwarrented invasion of their privacy by prohibiting the use of polygraph type equipment for certain purposes

732.	U.S. Department of State. Use of polygraph examinations. 1989 Jan 19; Department notice. 13 p. Rec #: 5776Keywords: regulations/ State Department/ applications-national security/ screening-federal/ applications-criminal investigations/ applications-counterintelligenceCall Number: LibraryNotes: Reprinted in Polygraph, 18(2)

733.	U.S. District Court supports police polygraph screening. Polygraph. 1974; 3(4):412-416.Rec #: 5778Keywords: screening-police-San Francisco/ law-labor-policeCall Number: Library

734.	U.S. Joint Security Commission Report Includes Polygraph Considerations. Polygraph. 1994; 23(1):1-23.Rec #: 9623Keywords: screening-national security/ examinersCall Number: Library

735.	Union representative testifies before House Labor-Management Committee. APA Newsletter. 1979(September/October):1-2.Rec #: 5684Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: Library

736.	Unions act on threats to privacy. Business Week. 1965(March 13):87-88.Rec #: 5686Keywords: screening-commercial/ labor-law/ privacyCall Number: ODS, P 5686

737.	United States. House of Respresentatives. Security clearance procedures in the intelligence agencies. Staff report on the Subcommittee on oversight permanent select committee on intelligence, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington: GPO; 19791-34.Rec #: 6902Keywords: intelligence/ security screeningCall Number: Library, 353.0074 Un3p

738.	Vasiliev, Aleksandr. Lie detector: Conjectures and reality. Private Detection, Safeguarding and Security. 1995(June).Rec #: 9625Keywords: screening-preemployment/ RussiaCall Number: ODS, P 9625Notes: Russian journal

739.	Wahrer, J. Martin. The relationship between characteristics of job applicants and admissions of employee theft. Masters Abstracts . 1987; 26(2 ):0210.Rec #: 5861Keywords: dissertations and theses/ screening-commercialCall Number: Library 363.254 W12Notes: Masters thesis, Michigan State University (University microfilm NO: AAD13-31246), 86 p.Abstract: Recently a trend toward the use of methodologically sound empirical studies to gain knowledge on employee theft has developed. The purpose of this project was to determine if relationships existed between characteristics of job applicants and admissions of internal theft. The current study uses data from pre-employment polygraph based interviews on employee misconduct from 599 job applicants. Characteristics examined were past history of drug use, frequency of marijuana use, use of drugs on the job, external economic pressures and age of the applicant. All characteristics were tested in bivariate relationships with admissions of employee theft. Additionally, the results of controlling age, sex, and marital status were examined. Specifically the results of this study revealed a series of relationships among admissions of internal theft and tests reflecting age of the applicant and tests affirming drug use. Additionally, the control variables of age and marital status exhibited statistically significant influences on these relationships. (Abstract shortened with permission of author.)

740.	Waller, Douglas. A tour through "hell week". Newsweek. 1993(April 12):33.Rec #: 7140Keywords: CIA/ psychological testing/ espionage/ security screeningCall Number: ODS, P 7140

741.	Walsh, Thomas J. The case for applicant investigation. Industrial Security. 1966; 10(5):3-6, 8, 10, 43-48.Rec #: 5895Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 5895

742.	Walters, C. Glenn and Gunn, Bruce. Appraising retailers use of the polygraph. Journal of Retailing. 1968; 43(4):10-21.Rec #: 5902Keywords: screening-commercial/ retailCall Number: ODS, P 5902

743.	Warren, Donald R. Fairness, personnel security and the polygraph. Security Management. 1984; 28(10, October):67-68.Rec #: 5909Keywords: screening-government/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5909

744.	Washnis, G. J. Polygraphic tests for city employees. Public Personnel Review. 1962; 23:192-198.Rec #: 5912Keywords: screening-police/ labor-law/ applications-parking lot attendants/ cases-screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 5912

745.	Weaver, Richard S. and Garwood, Marcia. Comparison of relevant/irrelevant and modified general question technique structures in a split counterintelligence-suitability phase polygraph examination. Polygraph. 1985; 14(2):97-107.Rec #: 5939Keywords: techniques-R&I/ techniques-MGQT/ screening-counterintelligence/ screening-suitabilityCall Number: ODS, P 5939, Library

746.	Weaver, Richard S. and Peters, Robert B. Difficulties encountered in assessing the validity and utility of government security screening examinations: Implications for researchers and policy makers. 1989 Oct 2315 p.Rec #: 9945Keywords: screening-security/ screening-federal/ validity/ utility/ policyCall Number: ODS, P 9945Notes: Unpublished manuscript

747.	Webb, James W. Excerpts from statement of James W. Webb, for the AFL-CIO. Hearing before the U.S. Department of Labor. APA Newsletter. 1980; 13(1, January 29):13-14.Rec #: 5941Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ AFL-CIOCall Number: Library

748.	Weir, Raymond J., Jr. Polygraph screening operations. 1962 Aug.Rec #: 5963Keywords: screening-federalCall Number: ODS, P 5963Notes: Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners

749.	---. Pre-test interview for a relevant/irrelevant polygraph examination [demonstration transcript]. 1977 Apr.Rec #: 5976Keywords: pretest interview/ techniques-relevant-irrelevant/ screening-police Call Number: ODS, P 5976

750.	---. Report on face-to-face polygraph testing. 1958 Aug 303.Rec #: 129Keywords: screening/ polygraph techniques/ interview techniquesCall Number: ODS, P 129, 9903

751.	Weir, Raymond J., Jr. and Atwood, Walter F. Applicant screening polygraph examinations. Polygraph. 1981; 10(3):129-142.Rec #: 8964Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 8964, Library

752.	Westin, Alan F. Debates over federal use of polygraphs. In. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum; 1967; pp. 227-241. Rec #: 7568Keywords: security screening/ applications-screening/ confessions/ deceptionCall Number: ODS, P 7568, 9903

753.	---. Probing the mind: Psychological surveillance. In. Privacy and Freedom. New York, NY: Atheneum; 1967; pp. 133-157. Rec #: 8965Keywords: screening/ privacy/ personality tests/ screening-commercial/ screening-law enforcementCall Number: ODS, P 8965

754.	---. The problem of employee privacy still troubles management. Fortune. 1979; 99(11):120-122, 126.Rec #: 5997Keywords: screening-commercial/ criticism-privacyCall Number: ODS, P 5997

755.	Wheeler, Dee E. Pre-employment polygraph examination of police applicants. Law and Order. 1963; 11(8):61-62.Rec #: 6004Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 6004

756.	White, Joseph C. An argument for pre-employment tests. Auditgram. 1964; 40(8).Rec #: 6013Keywords: screening-commercial-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 6013

757.	White, Lawrence T. Attitudinal consequences of the pre-employment polygraph examination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1984; 14:364-374. ISSN: 0021-9029.Rec #: 6014Keywords: screening-commercial-attitudes/ subjects-attitudes-screening/ surveys-subjects-screening/ research-screeningCall Number: Library

758.	White, Lawrence T.; Lopez, Margaret, and Haney, Craig. To polygraph or not: The effects of pre-employment polygraphing on work-related attitudes. Polygraph. 1982; 11(2):185-199.Rec #: 6015Keywords: screening-preemployment/ surveys/ attitudes-work-relatedCall Number: ODS, LibraryAbstract: College students (N=228) read one of two scenarios describing standard job application procedures -- one included a polygraph examination, the other did not -- and then responded to a questionnaire of work-related attitudes. Subjects reading the polygraph version expressed more negative attitudes toward the employer, work situation and other employees. We suggest the polygraph experience acts as a symbolic communication to the prospective employee from the employer, imparting unpleasant information that may lead to feelings of distrust and dislike.

759.	Whiteside, Glen O. Profits vs. polygraph. Phoenix, AZ: Associated Grocers; 1979. Rec #: 6017Keywords: screening-commercial/ law-arbitration/ law-NLRB/ pretest interview/ public relations/ report writing/ commercial aspectsCall Number: ODS, P 6017

760.	Willard, Richard K. Presidential directive on safeguarding national security information and polygraph examinations of federal employees. Statement before the Legislation and National Security Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, U.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC: GPO; 1983 Oct 19.Rec #: 6066Keywords: screening-federalCall Number: ODS, P 6066

761.	---. Safeguarding national security information and polygraph examinations of federal employees. Polygraph. 1983; 12(3):157-195.Rec #: 6065Keywords: applications-national security/ applications-criminal investigations/ screening-federal-policy/ admissibility-federal/ regulations-federal/ Department of JusticeCall Number: Library

762.	---. Statement of Richard K. Willard, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Department of Justice. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Civil Service, House Committee on the Post Office and Civil Service, concerning H.R. 4681, the Federal Polygraph Limitation and Anti-censorship Act of 1984 Washington, DC: GPO; 1984 Feb 29.Rec #: 6067Keywords: legislation-federal/ applications/ screening-government/ Department of JusticeCall Number: ODS, P 6067, 9903

763.	Williams, Pat. Statement of Honorable Pat Williams. Hearing before the Subcommittee on Employment Opportunities, House Committee on Education and Labor. On H.R. 1524, Polygraph Protection Act of 1985 Washington, DC: GPO; 1985 Jul 30.Rec #: 6072Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercial/ criticismCall Number: LibraryNotes: Printed in Polygraph, 14, 224-227

764.	Williams, Pat and Darden, George. Should we ban polygraph testing in private industry? American Legion Magazine. 1986; 120(4):10.Rec #: 6075Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 6075

765.	Wise, Lois Recascino and Charvat, Steven J. Polygraph testing in the public sector: the status of state legislation. Public Personnel Management. 1990; 19(4, Winter):381-390.Rec #: 7122Keywords: state legislation/ preemployment screening/ validityCall Number: ODS, P 7122

766.	Wynn, William H. Statement of William H. Wynn, International President, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union. Hearing before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources Washington, DC: GPO; 1986 Apr 2392-126.Rec #: 6145Keywords: legislation-federal-screening/ screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 6145, Library, 658.3112 Un3p

767.	Yamada, David C. The regulation of pre-employment honesty testing: Striking a temporary(?) balance between self-regulation and prohibition. Wayne Law Review. 1993; 39(4):1549-1587. ISSN: 0043-1621.Rec #: 9437Keywords: screening-commercial-preemployment/ honesty testing-preemploymentCall Number: ODS, P 9437

768.	Yankee, William J.; Giles, Frederick, and Grimsley, Douglas L. A comparison between control question and relevant-irrelevant polygraph test formats in a screening situation. 198696 p.Rec #: 8937Keywords: techniques-control question test/ techniques-relevant-irrelevant/ screeningCall Number: ODS, P 8937, Library 658.3112 Y2cNotes: NSA contract #MDA904-86-R-2192

769.	Yes to lie detector tests for private employers. Nation's Business. 1975(August):16. ISSN: 0028-047x.Rec #: 6198Keywords: screening-commercialCall Number: ODS, P 6198Notes: Reprinted in Utah Polygraph Association Newsletter, 2(4).

770.	Yeschke, Charles L. The advantages and limitations of police applicants testing with the polygraph. 1962 Aug.Rec #: 6200Keywords: screening-policeCall Number: ODS, P 6200Notes: Paper presented at the 9th annual meeting of the American Academy of Polygraph Examiners, Chicago, IL

771.	Young, James. Should a law enforcement polygraphist examine his fellow officers? Yes! Law & Order. 1974; 22(11, November):104.Rec #: 6214Keywords: screening-police/ law-rights-police/ applications-internal investigationsCall Number: ODS, P 6214

772.	Zank, Gordon. The use of the polygraph in business and industry. California State University ; 1979 Jun39 p.Rec #: 6224Keywords: screening-commercial/ surveys-statistical/ dissertations and thesesCall Number: ODS, P 6224Notes: Unpublished thesis