AntiPolygraph.org Message Board - to those who have used countermeasures

(UTC)

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

News:

You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.

In addition, check out our live chat server.

AntiPolygraph.org Message Board › Polygraph and CVSA Forums › Polygraph Procedure › to those who have used countermeasures

(Moderator: Administrator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

to those who have used countermeasures (Read 5897 times)

beech trees God Member Offline Posts: 593 Joined: Jun 22^nd, 2001 Gender:	to those who have used countermeasures Jun 28^th, 2001 at 3:57am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	I'm curious: How long did you practice, and what advice would you give to make practice more productive?

	"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government." ~ Thomas Paine
	IP Logged

Godzilla New User Offline Posts: 8 Joined: Aug 9^th, 2001	Re: to those who have used countermeasures Reply #1 - Aug 22^nd, 2001 at 5:34am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	I have the same concerns, i would love to see an educated response to this question.


	IP Logged

Gordon H. Barland Senior User Offline Posts: 68 Joined: Mar 13^th, 2001	Re: to those who have used countermeasures Reply #2 - Aug 31^st, 2001 at 11:27pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	I find it revealing that in two months and 227 viewings, nobody has seen fit to answer the plea. So let me put in my two cents worth. I don't think there's any one answer to this. There are a lot of variables involved: What type of test is being used? Some are more susceptible to CMs than others. How experienced is the examiner at detecting CMs? Is he alert for them? Has he had specialized training in identifying them? This varies from agency to agency, examiner to examiner. Is there quality control? All federal examiners operate within a quality control system. On average, quality control personnel seem to be more experienced at detecting many CMs than the original examiner. What type of CMs are being employed? Some are likely to be detected, others are less obvious. How adept is the person taking the test at employing the CM? Some people learn them quickly and well; others do poorly regardless of how much instruction they get. This last point is the one Beech Trees and Godzilla are interested in. As you see, it is only one item in a long equation. Let me reiterate an important point. Countermeasures may shift the odds to a greater or lesser degree; they do not assure success. There are risks involved. Examiners are catching an increasing number of people who were unsuccessful in applying countermeasures. In my opinion, this increase in CM detection is likely caused by two factors: First, more people are trying them based on the Internet advice. Second, examiners are more experienced in detecting them. Peace. Gordon

	Gordon H. Barland
	WWW IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Offline Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6220 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: to those who have used countermeasures Reply #3 - Sep 2^nd, 2001 at 10:05am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Gordon, I also find it interesting that in two months and 227 viewings, "nobody has seen fit to anwer the plea." I don't know how much can be inferred from this, however. As with polygraphy, there are too many unknown and unknowable variables. For example, we don't know, and cannot know, how many people who used countermeasures read this message thread (though it seems safe to assume that the number was less than 227). Clearly any who did use countermeasures and viewed this message thread chose not to post a reply. You said that this is "revealing." What, in your opinion, does it reveal? You assert that a polygrapher's experience, alertness, and training in detecting countermeasures is a "variable involved." Could you cite any peer-reviewed research that indicates that a polygrapher's experience, alertness, and training have any correlation with a polygrapher's ability to detect the point countermeasures discussed in The Lie Behind the Lie Detector? With regard to the last point you made: Quote: Let me reiterate an important point. Countermeasures may shift the odds to a greater or lesser degree; they do not assure success. There are risks involved. Examiners are catching an increasing number of people who were unsuccessful in applying countermeasures. In my opinion, this increase in CM detection is likely caused by two factors: First, more people are trying them based on the Internet advice. Second, examiners are more experienced in detecting them. This is similar to your argument in the message thread Countermeasure considerations for the innocent. Yet when you were asked to support your arguments, you chose to dodge the hard questions that were put to you. Which I find "revealing."

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

beech trees God Member Offline Posts: 593 Joined: Jun 22^nd, 2001 Gender:	Re: to those who have used countermeasures Reply #4 - Sep 9^th, 2001 at 9:00am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Quote: Anonymous, Now this is exactly the type of discussion I had hoped for, on a topic dear to my heart. I will give you my views in the coming days and weeks, but wish to clear up some of the back log first. Mr. Barland, The above cited quote appears from a reply you made almost four months ago to a post directly addressed to you in another thread. I find it interesting and illustrative that you chose not to address that topic-- dear to your heart-- as you clearly stated you would do, but rather you expend your energies on other threads created after whatever 'backlog' you were experiencing has no doubt dissapated.

	"It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government." ~ Thomas Paine
	IP Logged

Gordon H. Barland Senior User Offline Posts: 68 Joined: Mar 13^th, 2001	Re: to those who have used countermeasures Reply #5 - Sep 29^th, 2001 at 3:07am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Beech trees, I've posted a note about this on another thread, "Theories of CQT-polygraphy (Attn Gordon Barland)." It will be a while before I can discuss theories. So many topics, so little time! But patience. I will indeed return to theories. Peace, Gordon

	Gordon H. Barland
	WWW IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

to those who have used countermeasures

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.