Quote:
When I received this letter, needless to say I was floored. I am a Field Training Officer, I have received numerous letters of commendation as well as letters of recommendation and I am Nationally Certified Use of Force Instructor.
Officer Owens,
Welcome to the site,
With the impeccable credentials you have, I too would have not only been floored but insulted that my integrity was compromised by the "pseudoscience of polygraphy".
The fact that you were at work and only a few (10 or so) minutes late for your exam because of an on-duty incident that required your presence only gives the polygrapher an excuse to find you "deceptive". You probably have downloaded and started to explore
The Lie Behind The Lie Detector. The knowledge you gain from this reading will give you insight into what the polygrapher does before, during, and after the exam.
Did the polygrapher question you regarding your tardiness during the pre-test interview?
Did the polygrapher interrogate you after the test was over in an attempt to get an admission of guilt regarding any of the relevant questions during the exam that you allegedly had a "significant emotional response" to?
Quote:I believe thorough background investigations, psychological exams and a strenuous screening process are far better ways to weed out the "bad apples"
You are very correct in this statement. It is a shame that so many LE agencies use the polygraph as the "primary" investigative tool to filter applicants because in their eyes the "accuracy" warrants the expenditure of testing applicants(at the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Dept. polygraphers make $70,000 a year). When you look at failure rates at the LAPD and LASD, it raises a huge RED FLAG about "vaildity" of the test.
Keep you head up Officer Owens,
Good Luck
Fred F.