quickfix wrote on Oct 16^th, 2017 at 7:00pm:

Nothing libelous about it.  You were a threat to national security, and you've been neutralized.  The system works as it's supposed to.

No quickfix, the system does not work at least the system that relies on the fraud of the polygraph. That system is corrupt and broken and needs to be destroyed. And when you  talk  about a threat to national security – you and your fellow charlatans are a grave threat to our national security because you have sold the government a bill of goods and you know you are lying – and soon everyone else will know too!

quickfix wrote on Oct 16^th, 2017 at 7:00pm:


Quickfix, on the basis of what evidence do you assert that John M. was a threat to national security?

quickfix wrote on Oct 17^th, 2017 at 7:30pm:


Not that I give a big flying flatus what you think Quickfuk, but I will tell you that the "evidence" that the  Government presented in  my case was evidence of only one thing – a set-up by a group of polygraph operators who were enraged at having been confronted with the truth about the evil polygraph industry. As to why I plead guilty – I really had no option. My POS attorney told me at lunch on the first day of trial that he did not know how to offer a defense. In an adversarial proceeding if you cannot present a defense, you're screwed. So I told him to make the best deal he could and then I had to live with it. But as I have said before I was imprisoned for doing something that you and all your cohorts have always said was impossible for me to do – teach someone to beat the polygraph. My conviction proves the polygraph is worthless as a "lie detector"!  And it was worth two years in prison to finally be able to prove that – and to prove that the government knows that! 

George W. Maschke wrote on Oct 17^th, 2017 at 8:35pm:

That's the $64,000 question.  The only person who can answer that question is John M., not me, not you, not the Examiner.  John M.  He was given ample opportunity to provide a reason.  He chose not to.  And that's what did him in.   

As far as Doug goes, he let his own arrogance do him in.  Entrapment, no entrapment, doesn't matter.  He committed a felony, and suffered the consequences.

The attached "reasonable information" was provided in writing to my chain of command and the SSO shortly after my second interrogation.  It was also included in my appeal - which was also ignored.

The truth is, and hard as it is to get this across, there are many reasons for someone to emit a physiological response.  I've said this many, many times before - fear of failing produces a very strong uncontrollable reaction.  On their polygraph machine, it must look very much like a lie.

For what it's worth, the only facet of my DOD OIG complaint that they actually investigated, was whether or not I had committed a security violation with any of the" reasonable information" which I provided (see the second attachment)

Here is the second attachment from my last post...

Quickfix,

Thank you for the examples you provided, but they aren't examples of truthful persons who exhibited significant responses to relevant questions. In both of your example, the examinee had actually answered a relevant question untruthfully (and only came clean during post-test interrogation). So again, hypothetically speaking, what sort of explanation could a genuinely truthful person whose polygraph charts nonetheless turn out "significant response" provide that would lay to rest any security concerns?

Regarding Doug Williams' situation, yes, of course his prison sentence was real. But again — and despite having seized Doug's sales, e-mail, and phone records and having questioned many of his thousands of identified customers — the only "crimes" with which Doug was charged, and to which he pled guilty, are those that our government conceived, planned, and play-acted. Perhaps none of that disturbs you, but it doesn't seem like justice to me.

quickfix wrote on Oct 18^th, 2017 at 9:01pm:

Because you can't handle the truth.  This whole messed up situation is soaked with irony.

This is the type of non-coherent blather that they are using to get away with abusing people with the polygraph.

Notice how he didn't touch my "concerns with the question" memo from yesterday.  After I would divulge this information to the polygraph operators, they would say "okay, now other than that, what else did you do?"  Like, I'm supposed to forget that they told me that I failed the question before, and somehow suppress the fear and anxiety of what will happen if I would react again.

I was scared shitless that I was going to lose my career if I reacted.  It was like they were holding a gun to my head.  This happened 5 times in 3 years.  I have estimated that over those 20+ hours of interrogation, I was probably asked that goddamn question over 2,000 times.  It keeps me awake at night - still.

I've often explained my uncontrollable reaction as like when you are driving at night and flashing lights appear in your rearview mirror. You haven't been drinking, you aren't speeding, and you know that you haven't done anything wrong.  You can't help but get the butterflies.  Hell, I was getting butterflies on the way to the appointments - just knowing that they were going to ask me that question - and have to sit through another interrogation.

George asks some very pointed questions that have gone unanswered for too long.  Now, dickfix doesn't want to debate the issue either - anybody care to guess why?