Joe McCarthy wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2017 at 5:22pm:

ok Dan, you're tollie is going back to the, land of make believe; better go catch it.

The APA will never vote for its own demise.  What I believe it will vote for, is someone what wants to stop the victimization, encourage transparency, start backing responsible regulation within the industry, dam and and enforce free market trade, stop the sense of entitlement to the establishment so EVERYONE has to earn the business they get, insist on independent review of charts so someone is checking behind us to keep us honest, and make sure that while no examiners has a right to business, every examiner has a right to do business  in a responsibly regulated free market

Dan Mangan wrote on Jun 2^nd, 2017 at 7:18pm:


Unbiased, thats funny

I think you're both biased.

One is destructive to protect the status quo, generally speaking, and there are exceptions to the rule.

the other is just plain destructive for reasons even unknown to himself.

One has a purpose, at the vey least

One claims to have a purpose but lacks any substantive action.

ok so you want a platform, but yet you pussy out every time you're given one when you find out you'll be expected to actually answer questions?

This is a big part of my problem with you as of recent.

Also you keep saying you are going to rule from a bully pulpit, and you think that will get people to vote for you>  are ya smoking crack, or are you just that easy?  The more you say garbage like that, the less likely you will achieve that goal.

You make me want to join for no other reason to be a vote for anyone but you.   

You Dan, have been the biggest disappointment since the crucifixion

will you? 

ok lets put you to the test

remember you said you'd answer any question

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/maxprovocateur/2017/06/03/special-show