Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4  ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) H.R.2213 (Read 8572 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #15 - May 25th, 2017 at 11:35pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I did my part.  I'd like to think I had something to do with it being shot down - who knows?

More likely scenario is that the Polygraph Industrial Complex caught wind and slammed the door.
  

HR_2213_letter_from_Bilirakis.pdf ( 264 KB | 75 Downloads )

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation.  No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results."  ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #16 - May 31st, 2017 at 7:51pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
At 1:34 this afternoon the House Leader indicated that this Bill will be legislated next week. 

http://docs.house.gov/floor/

Skopos now gives it a 10% chance of passing.  What do you think its chances are?

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr2213

  

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation.  No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results."  ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box xenonman
God Member
Banned
*****
Offline


May sarin, ricin, and
variola major befall
Langley

Posts: 680
Location: WI   USA
Joined: Dec 14th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #17 - May 31st, 2017 at 9:51pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
John M. wrote on May 31st, 2017 at 7:51pm:
Skopos now gives it a 10% chance of passing.  What do you think its chances are?


maybe 7.5% !  (unless someone tacks on an amendment to exempt the IC from its provisions) Roll Eyes
  

What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
Back to top
YouTube  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #18 - Jun 1st, 2017 at 12:09pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
This Bill pertains specifically to the CBP.  The debates on it will hopefully expose the insanity however.  I hope to see my Congressman read my letter on the House Floor at some point.

BTW, did you see the season finale of "The Americans" on FX this week?  It further exposes the "Lie Behind the Polygraph".
  

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation.  No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results."  ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 5839
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #19 - Jun 7th, 2017 at 4:00pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
The House of Representatives is meeting to debate H.R. 2213 now. You can watch here:

http://www.fednet.net/?p=67560
  

George W. Maschke
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
PGP Public Key: 316A947C
PGP Public Key (offline): 2BF4374B
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 5839
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #20 - Jun 8th, 2017 at 11:07am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
H.R. 2213 passed by a wide margin (282-137) yesterday:

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/336811-house-votes-to-allow-lie-dete...
  

George W. Maschke
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
PGP Public Key: 316A947C
PGP Public Key (offline): 2BF4374B
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #21 - Jun 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
George W. Maschke wrote on Jun 8th, 2017 at 11:07am:
H.R. 2213 passed by a wide margin (282-137) yesterday:


Unreal.

It's astonishing how brazenly ignorant of the polygraph process our congresspersons are.

Those that voted against this Bill (all democrats), did so because they don't want any more border enforcement.  I sent tweets to all of them during the floor debates.

I'm starting on my Senators now (Rubio & Nelson).

I think this Bill will eventually pass - what do you think now George?
  

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation.  No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results."  ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 5839
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #22 - Jun 9th, 2017 at 6:57am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
John M. wrote on Jun 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
I think this Bill will eventually pass - what do you think now George?


I, too, expect it will eventually pass.
  

George W. Maschke
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
PGP Public Key: 316A947C
PGP Public Key (offline): 2BF4374B
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Wandersmann
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 228
Joined: Jun 2nd, 2015
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #23 - Jun 9th, 2017 at 1:35pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
John M. wrote on Jun 8th, 2017 at 9:55pm:
Unreal.

It's astonishing how brazenly ignorant of the polygraph process our congresspersons are.


I agree, but not surprised.  I'm not sure if they are brazenly ignorant or just totally corrupt.  I think it's that latter.  I understand your opposition to this bill and agree with you completely.  Could it be a good thing, however?  It seems to me that the entire premise of this bill involves the fact that the polygraph doesn't work.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #24 - Jun 9th, 2017 at 9:48pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Wandersmann wrote on Jun 9th, 2017 at 1:35pm:
Could it be a good thing, however?

Yeah, only if that one brave man you keep talking about shows up.

You should have seen the debates.  All they (the dems) kept talking about was watering down the screening process.

The fact that 60% of applicants are failing it, should be the freaking biggest red flag!

DIA's failure rates from 2011-2015 reportedly ranged from 15% - 22%.

The time has come to put a stop to this madness.
  

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation.  No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results."  ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 138
Location: Tampa, Florida
Joined: May 3rd, 2017
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #25 - Jun 9th, 2017 at 9:49pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
For the 2,000th time, answer the question!
  

CARTOON.JPG ( 34 KB | 47 Downloads )
CARTOON.JPG

"The polygraph examination is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation.  No, unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on its results."  ~ DODI 5210.91.
Back to top
Twitter  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box George W. Maschke
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


Make-believe science yields
make-believe security.

Posts: 5839
Location: The Hague, The Netherlands
Joined: Sep 29th, 2000
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #26 - Jul 14th, 2017 at 8:28am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Senators Durbin and Duckworth have introduced a bill (S.1560) that would block H.R.2213 and expand polygraph screening to currently serving CBP employees as well as mandating polygraph screening for Immigration and Customs Enforcement:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/two-democratic-senators-want-to-block-house...

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1560/text?q=%7B%22searc...
  

George W. Maschke
Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.)
E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com
Wire: @ap_org
PGP Public Key: 316A947C
PGP Public Key (offline): 2BF4374B
Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Ex Member
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 710
Joined: Dec 9th, 2012
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #27 - Jul 14th, 2017 at 2:51pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
George W. Maschke wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 8:28am:
Senators Durbin and Duckworth have introduced a bill (S.1560) that would block H.R.2213 and expand polygraph screening


There you go John M., Xeno and Wandersmann--reach out to these democrats and set them straight!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box xenonman
God Member
Banned
*****
Offline


May sarin, ricin, and
variola major befall
Langley

Posts: 680
Location: WI   USA
Joined: Dec 14th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #28 - Jul 14th, 2017 at 8:26pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Ex Member wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 2:51pm:
George W. Maschke wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 8:28am:
Senators Durbin and Duckworth have introduced a bill (S.1560) that would block H.R.2213 and expand polygraph screening


There you go John M., Xeno and Wandersmann--reach out to these democrats and set them straight!



Democrats speak with forked tongue! Cheesy
  

What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
Back to top
YouTube  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Wandersmann
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 228
Joined: Jun 2nd, 2015
Re: H.R.2213
Reply #29 - Jul 14th, 2017 at 9:15pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Ex Member wrote on Jul 14th, 2017 at 2:51pm:
There you go John M., Xeno and Wandersmann--reach out to these democrats and set them straight!


I'm glad they are going to expand polygraph screening.  That is the only way it will go away.  Pretty soon the number of victims will outnumber the number of people profiting from this system by 1000 to one.  The more innocent victims, the sooner this thing comes to an end.  If they made lawyers, judges, and Congressmen pass a polygraph to keep their jobs the whole thing would be gone tomorrow.   Wink

Quickfix, just curious .......... would you have any problem disbarring an attorney, removing a Federal judge from the bench, or removing a Congressman from office for failing a polygraph?   Huh
« Last Edit: Jul 14th, 2017 at 10:35pm by Wandersmann »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
H.R.2213

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X