Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) American Polygraph Assocation 2017 Contest for President-Elect a Three-Way Race (Read 6346 times)
Joe McCarthy
God Member
*****
Offline


Tiocfaidh ár lá

Posts: 525
Location: The Shroud of The Foggy Dew
Joined: Mar 25th, 2008
Gender: Male
Re: American Polygraph Assocation 2017 Contest for President-Elect a Three-Way Race
Reply #45 - Sep 19th, 2017 at 10:43pm
Print Post  
LMAO

RUN?

Ok Dan, you lost ALL credibility there.

They been trying to make me leave Texas for years and have thrown everything they could at me.  I'M STILL HERE.

Don't mistake dismissal for fear.




  

Joe
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dan Mangan
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 625
Joined: Jul 31st, 2014
Re: American Polygraph Assocation 2017 Contest for President-Elect a Three-Way Race
Reply #46 - Sep 20th, 2017 at 2:04am
Print Post  
Joe, you run from facts, logic, reason, and rational arguments.

Polygraph "testing" is a farce. Have you not read the NAS report?

But I get it: You're part of the PCSOT indu$trial complex. CHA-CHING!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Joe McCarthy
God Member
*****
Offline


Tiocfaidh ár lá

Posts: 525
Location: The Shroud of The Foggy Dew
Joined: Mar 25th, 2008
Gender: Male
Re: American Polygraph Assocation 2017 Contest for President-Elect a Three-Way Race
Reply #47 - Sep 20th, 2017 at 4:12am
Print Post  
YOU ARE FUCKING KIDDING RIGHT?

CHA HING?

Can you tell me where that bank account is?  I would love to know.

Dan, you talk a good game, but that is all you have, talk.

Only person with a history of running from questions, a documented history, is you.  That is the truth.  You have run from Pat, you have run from Raymond, you have run from every examiner who has ever confronted you, and you have run from me. 

Sorry Dan, but there are two types of people, talkers and doers, people like you, are just talkers. All you got is talk.

You say I'm part of the "PCSOT indu$trial complex", when fact is, and you know this, I have done more in one year to fight the corruption in this "complex" in one year, that you ever have, and ever will. 

I have paid the bill, excessively disproportionate to my perceived crimes against the polygraph establishment for telling the truth and exposing the corruption in Texas alone. 

You have done nothing, taken no action, other than hide behind a keyboard, talk and run failed campaigns, where you didn't even do the hard work necessary to win.

Sorry Dan, but to win, you must first, pay the bill.

And you are overdue
  

Joe
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dan Mangan
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 625
Joined: Jul 31st, 2014
Re: American Polygraph Assocation 2017 Contest for President-Elect a Three-Way Race
Reply #48 - Sep 20th, 2017 at 12:52pm
Print Post  
Joe, I know you hate it when I confuse you with the facts, but please pay attention.

*Polygraph "testing" is scientifically illegitimate (save, perhaps, for the rare CIT); there is no universal "lie response"

*The finite accuracy of polygraph "testing" is unknown and in fact unknowable

*A polygraph "test" can be beaten (or fatally confounded) by following simple instructions freely available on the internet

Yet, on its web site, the APA boasts the following claim: ...APA examiners are able to attain accuracy rates exceeding 90 percent.

People need to be protected from such wildly optimistic claims. That's why I have for years been advocating for both a bill of rights for polygraph test-takers, and a countermeasure challenge series to reveal the risks, realities and limitations of polygraph "testing."

Joe, I ask you again: What is the specificity of a 4-RQ PCSOT maintenance polygraph "test"? Please cite the research that supports your claim.
« Last Edit: Sep 20th, 2017 at 1:27pm by Dan Mangan »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Dan Mangan
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 625
Joined: Jul 31st, 2014
Re: American Polygraph Assocation 2017 Contest for President-Elect a Three-Way Race
Reply #49 - Sep 22nd, 2017 at 2:08am
Print Post  
Dan Mangan wrote on Sep 20th, 2017 at 12:52pm:
Joe, I ask you again: What is the specificity of a 4-RQ PCSOT maintenance polygraph "test"? Please cite the research that supports your claim.


C'mon, Joe, the world is waiting for your reply.

Is your answer, as the APA obliquely suggests, over 90 percent?

Is it over 80 percent?

Is it over 70 percent?

Is it over 60 percent?

Is it over 50 percent?

Tell, us Joe...just how accurate is a 4-RQ PCSOT maintenance "test"? And, as a subset of your overall accuracy, what is the specificity of the aforementioned polygraph "test"?

[cue crickets]

Meanwhile, the PCSOT gravy train rolls on...accuracy be damned.
« Last Edit: Sep 22nd, 2017 at 9:49am by Dan Mangan »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Send TopicPrint
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo