Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 18 ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) DIA's Insider Threat Program (Read 129034 times)
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Guest


Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #75 - Apr 5th, 2017 at 7:39pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Come on quickfix.  Do you even read what you've cut and pasted?  Reading comprehension must not be one of your strong suits.  Keywords: INITIAL, BASED ON A WRITTEN FINDING. 

Please read the ENTIRE regulation again and come to terms with the fact that the results of the polygraph by themselves can not be used to take unfavorable administrative action against an individual who is already been granted a clearance.

This is POLYGRAPH ABUSE!

When the Federal Judges come down with their ruling - and it will come soon - will you believe me then?

Wandersman - see my earlier post about the Code of Federal Regulations and the definition of Unfavorable Administrative Actions.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box quickfix
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 371
Joined: Jan 15th, 2006
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #76 - Apr 5th, 2017 at 7:56pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I know exactly what it says, as I participated in the creation of the regulation.  You are confusing clearance and access.  A person's CLEARANCE may not be revoked or suspended.  Access is completely different and can be denied or withdrawn.  Every DOD agency follows this guideline.  Access and clearance are NOT the same.  One can have a clearance and not be granted access, which is apparently where you fit.  In addition, initial and continuing access are both covered in 5210.91. I already previously cited the portion of the reg that covers continuing access.  Unless your CLEARANCE has been suspended or revoked, you have no legal argument.  You let us know when you hear from those federal judges.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Guest


Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #77 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 12:59am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
quickfix, you are part of the problem.  You are either deliberately trying to cover up the truth, or you have trouble with reading comprehension.

What does UNFAVORABLE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION mean to you?

I suggest you read the Code of Federal Regulations - especially definitions.  The regulation doesn't cover anything related to the difference between clearance and access -come on man, you're just making stuff up now.   

Your reference to continuing access was directly in taken from the part where it states who can be subjected to the polygraph - not what you can do with the results.

I have been trying to make this point for over three years now and finally, it's about to be exposed.

How do you know what every DoD organization does?  Maybe everyone outside of DIA follows the regulation.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Guest


Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #78 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 1:33am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
I have an idea quickfix.  How about discussing this with your OGC.  If you are DIA, start with Brett Stern (202)-231-6094.

Let's see you twist this - 

Unfavorable administrative action. Adverse action taken as the result of personnel security determinations and unfavorable personnel security determinations as defined in this part.

Unfavorable personnel security determination.
A denial or revocation of clearance for access to classified information; denial or revocation of access to classified information; denial or revocation of a Special Access authorization (including access to SCI); nonappointment to or nonselection for appointment to a sensitive position; nonappointment to or nonselection for any other position requiring a trustworthiness determination under this part; reassignment to a position of lesser sensitivity or to a nonsensitive position; and nonacceptance for or discharge from the Armed Forces when any of the foregoing actions are based on derogatory information of personnel security significance.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Guest


Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #79 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 1:37am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
An even better POC in the DAI/OGC is Brent Evitt (703)735-6317.

lawyer up buddy.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Wandersmann
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 228
Joined: Jun 2nd, 2015
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #80 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 2:39am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
quickfix wrote on Mar 26th, 2017 at 6:53pm:
Polygraph testing is voluntary, not mandatory.


Are you serious ?  Just like when someone holds a gun to your head and demands your wallet.  If you give the armed robber your wallet under those circumstances, it is also voluntary.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box xenonman
God Member
Banned
*****
Offline


May sarin, ricin, and
variola major befall
Langley

Posts: 680
Location: WI   USA
Joined: Dec 14th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #81 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 3:07am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Wandersmann wrote on Apr 6th, 2017 at 2:39am:
quickfix wrote on Mar 26th, 2017 at 6:53pm:
Polygraph testing is voluntary, not mandatory.


Are you serious ?  Just like when someone holds a gun to your head and demands your wallet.  If you give the armed robber your wallet under those circumstances, it is also voluntary.


Of course it's voluntary; you just kiss the rest of your application processing good-bye! Grin
  

What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
Back to top
YouTube  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box quickfix
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 371
Joined: Jan 15th, 2006
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #82 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 7:05pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
lawyer up buddy.


No need.  Unlike you, I passed my poly.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box xenonman
God Member
Banned
*****
Offline


May sarin, ricin, and
variola major befall
Langley

Posts: 680
Location: WI   USA
Joined: Dec 14th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #83 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 7:07pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
quickfix wrote on Apr 5th, 2017 at 7:56pm:
Access and clearance are NOT the same.



What exactly, in practical terms, is the difference between the two? Huh
  

What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
Back to top
YouTube  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box xenonman
God Member
Banned
*****
Offline


May sarin, ricin, and
variola major befall
Langley

Posts: 680
Location: WI   USA
Joined: Dec 14th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #84 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 7:16pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
So, for 10 months I sat waiting for my fate - with nothing to do, answering phones and occupying a meaningless position.  They put me in a section they affectionately called “The Misfit Toys”.  This is where people go who lose their clearances for things like beating their wife, drunk driving, or drugs.


I suppose that we should be grateful that the DIA at least makes an effort to provide accommodation for its now "useless" employees who've lost clearances.

At the CIA, it would just be "see you later, sucker" !  lol Grin
  

What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
Back to top
YouTube  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box quickfix
Especially Senior User
*****
Offline



Posts: 371
Joined: Jan 15th, 2006
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #85 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 7:35pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
For those like John M. who are ignorant of the difference between a clearance and access, here are the differences:

one can have a TS clearance and not have access. A clearance only grants one the eligibility to have access to that level.  Clearance granting is based on a favorable background investigation.

Access is the approval for read-on to special programs, special compartmented information (SCI), or other restricted or protected programs or information.   Certain programs require additional security measures as a condition.  Special Access Programs (SAP), SCI, JWICS, NSA network, CIA access, and other similar programs may require successful completion of a polygraph exam as a condition for that specific access.  Failure to successfully complete a polygraph will result in denial of access, but not loss of the clearance.  As a result, loss of access is not considered "administrative adverse action", as John M. incorrectly believes.  Adverse administrative action means loss of job, loss of clearance when clearance is a condition of employment, loss of pay, or reduction in grade.  Loss of clearance occurs when credible derogatory information exists to justify revocation (loss) of clearance.  A civilian employee who loses access is simply put into another position at the same grade and pay that does not require access.

Which is why John M. has been banging his head against the table for 3 years.  He has no valid argument regarding loss of access after 5 unresolved polygraphs.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Guest


Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #86 - Apr 6th, 2017 at 10:09pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Okay, this is getting really old.  Is the regulation that hard to understand?  Possibly, but I doubt it.  If people like quickfix actually believe what he says, DIA’s abuse of the polygraph has become institutionalized.

I’ll repeat this one more time, the DOD regulation states:

The polygraph is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of screening or investigation.  No unfavorable administrative action (to include access, employment, assignment, and detail determinations) shall be taken solely on the basis of either a refusal to undergo a polygraph examination or an unresolved polygraph examination.

The Code of Federal Regulations Title 32, Part 154, subpart 154 defines an unfavorable administrative action as: 

Unfavorable administrative action. Adverse action taken as the result of personnel security determinations and unfavorable personnel security determinations as defined in this part.

Unfavorable personnel security determination. A denial or revocation of clearance for access to classified information; denial or revocation of access to classified information; denial or revocation of a Special Access authorization (including access to SCI); nonappointment to or nonselection for appointment to a sensitive position; nonappointment to or nonselection for any other position requiring a trustworthiness determination under this part; reassignment to a position of lesser sensitivity or to a nonsensitive position; and nonacceptance for or discharge from the Armed Forces when any of the foregoing actions are based on derogatory information of personnel security significance.

Now, what is that bullshit about access and clearance again quickfix?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box xenonman
God Member
Banned
*****
Offline


May sarin, ricin, and
variola major befall
Langley

Posts: 680
Location: WI   USA
Joined: Dec 14th, 2009
Gender: Male
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #87 - Apr 7th, 2017 at 1:21am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
Quote:
If people like quickfix actually believe what he says, DIA’s abuse of the polygraph has become institutionalized.


There's doubtlessly a quickfix in all the Offices of Security throughout the IC, the DOD, and the various branches of the Armed Forces.  

With this thread, I'm starting to understand the mentality of these security cadres in the Government. Roll Eyes
  

What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security
and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac?   A great beginning!

The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
Back to top
YouTube  
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box Wandersmann
Very Senior User
****
Offline



Posts: 228
Joined: Jun 2nd, 2015
Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #88 - Apr 7th, 2017 at 3:31am
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
xenonman wrote on Apr 7th, 2017 at 1:21am:
With this thread, I'm starting to understand the mentality of these security cadres in the Government.


Easy to understand.  Insecure, envious, insignificant people who can feel important by messing with people superior to them in every way through this stupid voodoo that is sanctioned by a corrupt government.  I remember one little miscreant with a high school degree who was getting his jolly's by messing with a PhD.  If it wasn't for the polygraph most of these clowns would be working in a car wash.  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paste Member Name in Quick Reply Box John M.
Guest


Re: DIA's Insider Threat Program
Reply #89 - Apr 7th, 2017 at 1:39pm
Mark & QuoteQuote Print Post  
xenonman wrote on Apr 7th, 2017 at 1:21am:
With this thread, I'm starting to understand the mentality of these security cadres in the Government.


Precisely why I started it.  My goal was to expose this insidious and pernicious form of abuse and make it stop.

Major class action lawsuit here - lawyers like Mark Zaid should take notice and seize on this opportunity.

I completely agree with you Wandersmann.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 18
ReplyAdd Poll Send TopicPrint
DIA's Insider Threat Program

Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Open Preview Preview

You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.
Insert Hyperlink Insert FTP Link Insert Image Insert E-mail Insert Media Insert Table Insert Table Row Insert Table Column Insert Horizontal Rule Insert Teletype Insert Code Insert Quote Edited Superscript Subscript Insert List /me - my name Insert Marquee Insert Timestamp No Parse
Bold Italicized Underline Insert Strikethrough Highlight
                       
Change Text Color
Insert Preformatted Text Left Align Centered Right Align
resize_wb
resize_hb







Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:
Text size: pt
More Smilies
View All Smilies
Collapse additional features Collapse/Expand additional features Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips Sealed Undecided Kiss Cry
Attachments More Attachments Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB
Attachment 1:
X