Good luck in your efforts!

(Just don't expect great miracles from your Congressman, especially in matters involving the IC)

Quote:


All it will take is one decent, honest person in authority to bring this entire corrupt fraud against the American people crashing down.  The tyrants who ran East Germany thought their people's paradise would last forever.  Good and evil haven't changed.  Beware the fury of a patient man.   

Security Executive Agent Directive 2 - 14 September, 2014, signed by James R. Clapper (attached).

(U) USE OF POLYGRAPH IN SUPPORT OF PERSONNEL SECURITY DETERMINATIONS FOR INITIAL OR CONTINUED ELGIBILITY FOR ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED INFORMATION OR ELGIBILITY TO HOLD A SENSITIVE POSITION

Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities governing the use of polygraph examinations conducted by agencies in support of personnel security vetting for initial or continued eligibility for access to classified information or eligibility to hold a sensitive position.

E. (U) POLICY:
l. (U) Agency heads are responsible for establishing and maintaining an effective program to ensure that access to classified information or placement in a sensitive position is clearly consistent with the interests of the national security. When an agency head elects to use the polygraph for personnel security vetting as defined in Section D, this policy will apply, consistent with the EPPA and other applicable laws and regulations.

(U) CSP examinations represent the baseline for the application of polygraph in support of personnel security vetting. Heads of agencies may authorize the use of the CSP for the purposes stated above in Section B when deemed to be in the interest of national security. CSPs may be used in support of determinations of initial eligibility for access to classified information and initial eligibility to hold a sensitive position, thereafter in support of reinvestigations or continuous evaluation, and administered at periodic or aperiodic intervals.

Like I've pointed out several times before:  DODI 5210.91 is consistent with the EPPA in that the polygraph is a supplement to, not a substitute for, other methods of investigation.  No unfavorable administrative action shall be taken based solely on the results of the polygraph.

So, why is that no one can stop them from doing it?

I doubt we’ll see quickfix again.  Maybe he finally took my advice and spoke to someone from the Office of General Counsel.  Maybe Aunty Agony’s comments made him question his ignorance, or I know, maybe he’s trying to figure out who ordered the code red.

We’ll probably never be able to totally eradicate the polygraph, but we will be able to stop the abuse.  The DIA Office of Security is out of control, and the so-called “Credibility Assessments Program” is an evil entity that profits from destroying innocent lives.  They’ve been operating autonomously for way too long.  Soon they’ll all be exposed.

I never thought it would take this long, but believe me when I say, judgement IS coming.   

I am very grateful for all your support.

Wandersmann wrote on May 1^st, 2017 at 3:04am:


DOD developed Instructions (5210.91) and Directives (5210.48) in order to establish policy and assign responsibilities for the use of the polygraph amongst its agencies.  If there are identical regulations at the agencies you list, you must obtain them.

DIA has enacted its own policy that directly usurps DOD’s authority (DIAI 5200.002).  It’s right there in black and white!  Unmistakable and irrefutable material fact.

Even though I can clearly prove that they are in violation of Department regulations doesn’t mean much.   The DOD IG Congressional liaison told me that they had “limited” powers and the best they could do was “embarrass” the responsible officials.  He actually said that.

I spent 34 years in the IC without a single security related incident.

Six consecutive SSBI’s and a favorable adjudication by the Chief, Defense Intelligence, Central Adjudication Facility doesn’t mean much either.  I was stripped of my career, labeled a threat to security, a vulnerability to the mission, and needed to be “mitigated”.

The truth will eventually come out, it just needs to come out sooner.  Innocent people are continuing to be abused by a program that’s overeager to find the next leaker.  To stay relevant and keep their program alive, the offenders must keep finding potential traitors – exactly like the Stassi business model.

quickfix wrote on May 1^st, 2017 at 4:34pm:


There you have it John M, the polygraph said you are a security threat so you must be.  And the polygraph said Bradley (Chelsea) Manning and Edward Snowden are not security threats, so they must not be.     Quickfix, now get back to cleaning those latrines.  How many REMF medals have you received for your heroism on the polygraph?

John, just curious, were you ever given any indication that they may have something in addition to the polygraph results? Could someone have done you harm from the shadows? One of the reasons I left the corporate realm is because of too many scorpions under the rocks.