Here are the INDISPUTABLE MATERIAL FACTS:

1)      Fear and anxiety are irrepressible emotions – emotions that the polygraph interprets as a “lie.”

2)      Because the polygraph is inherently probabilistic, DoD has put protections in place that explicitly prohibit abusing an employee based solely on the results of the polygraph.

3)      People in DIA like quickfix, advance in their careers by violating approved and relevant regulations - in full view of everyone involved.  (To further prove this point, I have a 397 page independent investigation that contains affidavits, interrogatories and sworn testimonies from senior officials who admit to doing it.  I have also obtained hundreds of emails and other documents through FOIA that reveal their behind-the-scenes cover-up).

4)      Due to the lies, semantics and attempts to misdirect from the DIA Office of Security (like quickfix has so ineptly used on this thread), Inspector Generals at all levels (IC, DoD, DIA) are helpless to enforce the regulations and stop this abuse.


My Congressman and Senator’s offices are very aware of the issue, as is the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform and the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.  Because I am still awaiting the Judge’s rulings from two separate federal cases, I have been advised by all to wait for those Judge’s rulings.  This is why those rulings will be landmark – they will once and for all prove that DIA is in violation of DoD authority and my individual rights.

Quickfix’s arrogance is disgusting and his willful ignorance is utterly shameful.  If he is as who he says he is, a senior official involved in this pernicious abuse, he along with the others must be held accountable.

It takes a willing hand to punish horrible men.

Since you can't handle the truth, I'm done with you quickfix.  I refuse to answer one more of your silly little lies.  Thanks for helping me prove my point though.

You and those like you will ultimately be held accountable.

Quote:



One major point I have learned from this thread (combined with my own negative experiences with the IC) is that one's talents, skills, interests, and desire to work for the IC run a very far, far second to one's ability to play the polygraph and BI games, when it comes to employment within the IC.

The polygraph is, of course, modern day alchemy and the BI is essentially a popularity contest.
At the time of my applications to the IC, I had a perfect credit history, a clear police record, and a "satisfactory" residential and lifestyle history.  All that merely made it necessary for the BI's to have to dig deeper for dirt, until they finally were able to come upon some, in the form of a few jerks at a place where I worked part time when I was in college (known as "developed informants" in FBI-speak).

On another occasion, CIA recruiters informed me that because of my knowledge and skills, I was virtually assured of an "offer of employment" from the Agency.  This contact came as the result of my being approached by someone at the Agency, NOT the other way around.  Unfortunately, as I learned the hard way, the recruiters are wholly out of the loop of the Office of Security, and have no input into its processes.  The Offices of Security of the IC agencies are the last redoubt and deep cave for the troglodytic  "quickfixes" of the IC.

Those applicants best able to worm their way through the polygraph and BI tend to be chameleons and sociopaths, selected because of their ability to be deceptive and to be "all things to all people".  Since one's qualifications, skills,  and aptitude apparently play virtually NO role whatever in the personnel selection decisions of the IC agencies' Offices of Security" , it is small wonder that IC personnel are so mediocre and that the IC is a perfect incubator for the mental development of specimens like a "quickfix"!. 

In the case of the CIA, its successful applicants appear to be college grads with otherwise unemployable majors, who have lucked their way through the BI popularity contest and the polygraph, and who have thus been hired based primarily upon luck and chameleonship, rather than occupational qualifications!

I wish to thank the various participants in this thread.  More than most of the other posts on this site, the present prolonged thread has provided me with ample clarification and insight as to the attitudes of those who in fact control the keys of access into the IC.

This is what this thread looks like to Aunty --

George W. Maschke, Doug Williams, Wandersmann, xenonman, John M., et. al.: Some government agencies are violating their own guidelines that limit administrative actions based on the polygraph lie detector. As an applicant or employee, you may be required to undergo a polygraph examination. You will have an even chance to fail whether you are lying or not, and because these agencies illegally violate their own prescribed procedures, if you fail a polygraph test you will not be hired or you will lose your clearance. 

quickfix: No, you guys are wrong wrong wrong. If you fail a polygraph test you will not be hired or you will lose your clearance. 

Caca_Dau wrote on Apr 10^th, 2017 at 2:22pm:


It isn't  just quickfix, but also all of his colleagues at the various agencies' respective Offices of Security throughout the entire IC.  You will find that his type of mentality permeates every agency that restricts access to its premises and/or that handles classified info.   

Quote:


Much luck in your endeavors!  
I might even be game for a class action?  lol  

Quote:


Count me in for sure.  When you are ready let me know and we'll work out a way to get in contact.  When we find some honest jurists with half a brain this should be huge.  Libeling people with absolutely no evidence or proof, taking away livelihoods with no due process.  Sooner or later they will take down someone with the right political connections and it will all come crumbling down.  It is inevitable now because they are parasites and parasites can't stop feeding until it is too late.  Beware the fury of a patient man.