Wandersmann wrote on Feb 16^th, 2017 at 3:07am:


I remember that the Agency polygrapher who was "interviewing" me posed the question as to whether my intention in applying for employment was to cause the Agency "harm". He also asked as to whether I had "studied" the polygraph. Back then, in those days of my innocence, I had no idea what he possibly could have meant by either question.   
Now today, more fully understanding the reality that is the IC and polygraphy in general, I suspect that my participating in a forum such as AP would today be interpreted as exactly what that jerk had in mind back then by my wanting to "cause harm" to the Agency.  I am glad that today we have such opportunities (that would not have been imaginable back in 1979) to cause such "harm".
The vile personal attacks made against myself and others at AP serve as confirmation for me that AP is indeed causing concern and consternation for an Agency which has for far too long relied on utter unaccountability and lack of visible scrutiny un order to cloak its continuing malfeasance.  The importance of that success in causing anger for the folks at Langley can never be underestimated.  The thuggish tactics of the pro-polygraph minority who attempt to deride, in increasingly hostile fashion, those who are crusading against this contemporary form of witch burning are a clear indication, to me at least, that the strength and influence of AP are on the rise, and that we have the truth on our side !