AntiPolygraph.org Message Board - Does the CIT steal the Antipolygraph Community's Fire?

(UTC)

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

You can enhance your privacy when browsing and posting to this forum by using the free and open source Tor Browser and posting as a guest (using a fake e-mail address such as nobody@nowhere.com) or registering with a free, anonymous ProtonMail e-mail account. Registered users can exchange private messages with other registered users and receive notifications.

In addition, check out our live chat server.

AntiPolygraph.org Message Board › Polygraph and CVSA Forums › Polygraph Procedure › Does the CIT steal the Antipolygraph Community's Fire?

(Moderator: Administrator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Add Poll

Send Topic

Does the CIT steal the Antipolygraph Community's Fire? (Read 18093 times)

Ex Member God Member Offline Posts: 710 Joined: Dec 9^th, 2012	Re: Does the CIT steal the Antipolygraph Community's Fire? Reply #30 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 2:59am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Electrical Engineering, involved in instrumentation, which sparked an interest in the subject. I find it an interesting mix of science and ethics--similar to whether or not an engineer should be involved in the design of weaponry. I am very prolific and varied in my interests, studies and experimentation encompassing many disciplines, mostly involving science. And, I do find Matte's Hope/Fear concept very interesting....
	« Last Edit: Feb 17^th, 2016 at 8:50am by Ex Member »

	IP Logged

Ex Member God Member Offline Posts: 710 Joined: Dec 9^th, 2012	Re: Does the CIT steal the Antipolygraph Community's Fire? Reply #31 - Feb 17^th, 2016 at 8:53pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Doc, If you are ever so inclined, on page 12 of the attached issue of the European Police Science and Research Bulletin is a very interesting article by Kovalenka & Saldžiūnas which delineates a forensic example of the EKT. I believe these gentlemen are worthy of your time and scrutiny as they have over a decade of empirical data from high stakes field examinations. It's also curious to note that the criminal courts accept their polygraph testimony into evidence. Also interesting is the fact that they tried and eventually abandoned the CQT totally in 2004.

	09_EPSR_BULLETIN.pdf ( 4471 KB \| Downloads )
	IP Logged

xenonman God Member Banned Offline May sarin, ricin, and variola major befall Langley Posts: 680 Location: WI USA Joined: Dec 14^th, 2009 Gender:	Re: Does the CIT steal the Antipolygraph Community's Fire? Reply #32 - Apr 11^th, 2016 at 12:04pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Ex Member wrote on Feb 14^th, 2016 at 7:22pm: Dan, I never attended a polygraph school. I am an engineer by trade. "Polygraph school"? Wouldn't that be a bit like an astrology school? lol

	What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac? A great beginning! The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
	YouTube IP Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3]

Add Poll

Send Topic

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Does the CIT steal the Antipolygraph Community's Fire?

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.