AntiPolygraph.org Message Board - DOS Diplomatic Security Service

(Moderator: Administrator)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

DOS Diplomatic Security Service (Read 7201 times)

xenonman God Member Banned Offline May sarin, ricin, and variola major befall Langley Posts: 680 Location: WI USA Joined: Dec 14^th, 2009 Gender:	DOS Diplomatic Security Service Aug 30^th, 2015 at 1:13am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Does the Diplomatic Security Service at State use the polygraph at all on its staff and/or applicants? I know that generally the State Dept. does not.

	What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac? A great beginning! The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
	YouTube IP Logged

Wandersmann Very Senior User Offline Posts: 228 Joined: Jun 2^nd, 2015	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #1 - Aug 31^st, 2015 at 3:50am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	xenonman wrote on Aug 30^th, 2015 at 1:13am: Does the Diplomatic Security Service at State use the polygraph at all on its staff and/or applicants? I know that generally the State Dept. does not. Don't know, they probably do because the elitists in the Diplomatic Corps look down on 1811's and they are just seen as commoners. What about Hillary ? I have no doubt that she would always be found NDI. If she was going down the drain and her political demise was assured, however, then like sharks devouring one of their own, the polygraphers would pounce on her and declare her DI. They would then take credit for discovering her nefarious behavior. If it wasn't so serious and there weren't so many innocent victims, the application of this garbage science is laughable.


	IP Logged

xenonman God Member Banned Offline May sarin, ricin, and variola major befall Langley Posts: 680 Location: WI USA Joined: Dec 14^th, 2009 Gender:	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #2 - Aug 31^st, 2015 at 4:02am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Similarly, in Langley, the DDCI and DCI are immune from having to undergo the polygraph ordeal that their underlings all must suffer! [size=12]

	What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac? A great beginning! The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
	YouTube IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Online Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #3 - Sep 1^st, 2015 at 6:11am	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	xenonman wrote on Aug 30^th, 2015 at 1:13am: Does the Diplomatic Security Service at State use the polygraph at all on its staff and/or applicants? To the best of my knowledge, the answer to your question is "no" insofar as polygraph screening is concerned. See the State Department's polygraph policy here: https://antipolygraph.org/documents/12m0250.pdf However, the State Department has compelled non-U.S. citizens hired abroad to undergo polygraph screening "tests" at certain locations, including the U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen: https://antipolygraph.org/blog/2013/03/29/u-s-embassy-in-yemen-reportedly-forces...

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

Wandersmann Very Senior User Offline Posts: 228 Joined: Jun 2^nd, 2015	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #4 - Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 4:42pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	xenonman wrote on Aug 31^st, 2015 at 4:02am: Similarly, in Langley, the DDCI and DCI are immune from having to undergo the polygraph ordeal that their underlings all must suffer! [size=12] This is interesting. I'm surprised they don't take it to create the appearance of fairness. I guess our class of royalty in America is taking form. If they had to take it, they probably wouldn't fail it. If by some odd chance an overzealous polygraph examiner didn't follow the party line, there would be no consequences to them for failing. I'm curious, does anyone know if General Petraeus was required to take a polygraph ? One of my friends told me that the polygraph is what tripped him up and got him in trouble. That could be correct, but my recollection is that someone came forward with information that lead to his troubles. If my recollection is correct, that could imply that he passed his polygraph(s) ?


	IP Logged

George W. Maschke Global Moderator Online Make-believe science yields make-believe security. Posts: 6211 Joined: Sep 29^th, 2000	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #5 - Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 6:01pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	I am not aware of any documentation that the CIA director and deputy director are exempt from the CIA's polygraph screening requirement. However, a 1994 article by Washington Post columnist Al Kamen suggests that CIA directors may not have been obligated to take the polygraph, but subjected themselves to it anyway: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1994/03/09/woolsey-to-join-cia-p... With respect to former CIA director David Petraeus and the polygraph, see: https://antipolygraph.org/cgi-bin/forums/YaBB.pl?num=1352539901

	George W. Maschke I am generally available in the chat room from 3 AM to 3 PM Eastern time. Tel/SMS: 1-202-810-2105 (Please use Signal Private Messenger or WhatsApp to text or call.) E-mail/iMessage/FaceTime: antipolygraph.org@protonmail.com Wire: @ap_org Threema: A4PYDD5S Personal Statement: "Too Hot of a Potato"
	WWW Twitter YouTube IP Logged

Wandersmann Very Senior User Offline Posts: 228 Joined: Jun 2^nd, 2015	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #6 - Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 6:19pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	George W. Maschke wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 6:01pm: However, a 1994 article by Washington Post columnist Al Kamen suggests that CIA directors may not have been obligated to take the polygraph, but subjected themselves to it anyway: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1994/03/09/woolsey-to-join-cia-p.... I love the quote from Robert M. Gates stating that "he volunteered to take it [polygraph] about a year after his appointment as CIA director in 1991 "to maintain the symbolism" of enduring the same hardships as rank-and-file employees". Doesn't that say it all ! Symbolism over substance, our new motto. In other words, it's a total joke because if he failed it absolutely nothing would happen to him. John Q. Public, on the otherhand, possibly an honest, innocent, wounded veteran with lots of debt and five mouths to feed would be out on the street.


	IP Logged

Evan S Senior User Offline Posts: 67 Joined: Dec 22^nd, 2007	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #7 - Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 6:54pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Wandersmann: Thanks for this interesting tidbit. Unfortunately the WP link does not seem to work. A similar thing occurred around 1999 with Bill Richardson, head of the DOE. If memory serves, he took the security-screening polygraph to set an example for the rank-and-file scientists. (This was in the aftermath of the Wen Ho Lee incident.) Not surprisingly Richardson passed it. His polygrapher knew who the subject was, and the NDI was a foregone conclusion. The polygrapher's survival instincts kicked in; failing the manager guarantees your own failure. Regards, Evan S


	IP Logged

Wandersmann Very Senior User Offline Posts: 228 Joined: Jun 2^nd, 2015	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #8 - Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 7:58pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Evan S wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 6:54pm: Thanks for this interesting tidbit. Unfortunately the WP link does not seem to work. Thanks for letting me know Evan. I suggest everyone go to George Maschke's response above mine and use his link. It works.


	IP Logged

xenonman God Member Banned Offline May sarin, ricin, and variola major befall Langley Posts: 680 Location: WI USA Joined: Dec 14^th, 2009 Gender:	Re: DOS Diplomatic Security Service Reply #9 - Sep 15^th, 2015 at 10:50pm	Mark & Quote Quote Print Post
	Wandersmann wrote on Sep 2^nd, 2015 at 4:42pm: xenonman wrote on Aug 31^st, 2015 at 4:02am: Similarly, in Langley, the DDCI and DCI are immune from having to undergo the polygraph ordeal that their underlings all must suffer! [size=12] This is interesting. I'm surprised they don't take it to create the appearance of fairness. I guess our class of royalty in America is taking form. If they had to take it, they probably wouldn't fail it. If by some odd chance an overzealous polygraph examiner didn't follow the party line, there would be no consequences to them for failing. I'm curious, does anyone know if General Petraeus was required to take a polygraph ? One of my friends told me that the polygraph is what tripped him up and got him in trouble. That could be correct, but my recollection is that someone came forward with information that lead to his troubles. If my recollection is correct, that could imply that he passed his polygraph(s) ? NO, because as DCI he would have been exempt from the Agency polygraph requirement.

	What do we call it when every employee of the Agency's Office of Security and Office of Personnel drowns in the Potomac? A great beginning! The best intelligence community employee is a compromised IC employee!
	YouTube IP Logged

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Send Topic

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

DOS Diplomatic Security Service

Name:
E-mail:
Your Verification Code is:	Please type the characters that appear in the image. The characters must be typed in the same order, and they are case-sensitive.
Verification Code:
Preview

Message Icon:

Subject:

Message:
You can resize the textbox by dragging the right or bottom border.

Max 200000 characters. Remaining characters:

Text size: pt

More Smilies

View All Smilies

Collapse/Expand additional features

Attachments More Attachments

Allowed file types: txt doc docx ics psd pdf bmp jpe jpg jpeg gif png swf zip rar tar gz 7z odt ods mp3 mp4 wav avi mov 3gp html maff pgp gpg
Maximum Attachment size: 500000 KB

Attachment 1:

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Attachment 4:

Attachment 5:

Attachment 6:

Attachment 7:

Attachment 8:

Attachment 9:

Attachment 10:

Disable UBBC and Smilies:

Check this if you wish to disable parsing of ubbc tags and smilies.

Return To:

Select where you would like to return to after posting.