I am eagerly waiting to see if she will be honorable and identify herself. Is she willing to stand by her words? Is the company she works for willing to stand by her words? Or are they still "adopting" a policy of handing out bags of crap? From what I understand, there are lots of bags of crap. What are they so afraid of if I am wrong and they are right? Why would someone hide if they are defending their honor; why not stand proudly and stand up to the bully you insist I am? You see, they have a habit of doing this even in the lawsuit. I suspect that December may be the person from Behavioral Measures that engaged, or tried to engage in exparte communications with the judge from the lawsuit in 2008. She has a history of being willing to carry the Behavioral Measures big bag of Holden crap, and then fall on the sword. This is the Behavioral Measures MO. They send out their employees to do their dirty work, bags of crap in hand to fling whatever poo they can. Then if they get caught like lieguytoo and Ms. Farra Flunky, they fall on the sword and say, "Holden and Parker knew nothing, we acted on our own." Here is the thing, they work for Behavioral Measures and therefor anything they do while working for BM ultimately makes the company responsible too. Do you not manage your employees Rick? How does Parker and Holden not know what is going on in their own office? Well I know Parker had to have known about the exparte communications; because that same day, a letter was sent to the Bar with an identical package of information which contained his signature. Documentation also contained fax headers that identified BM. The information sent to Judge Evans had the fax readers removed by white out and copy, or so it appeared. Oh what got BM and their flunky got caught? Ms. Farah Flunkie got caught because when she put postage of the package sent to the judge, she used the BM postal meter which attached identifying information that led right back to their office. Just lie lieguytoo's IP addresses traced back to the Offices of Behavioral Measures as well. Wow, these people are "wicked smaht" See everyone, these people have no credibility or honor. They would rather let a woman go out and do their dirty work and then let a woman fall on the sword for them. In my opinion, they are no better than Al Qaeda when they filled locations with women and children to prevent a location from being bombed. That is what filthy people like BM and Al Qaeda do, they use women to do their bidding so when they get caught, they can blame it all on them and watch them fall on the sword. Chivalry is clearly dead in the offices of BM. They send Hubbard and Ms. Flunky to do their dirty work because neither are man enough to look me in the eye and take me on man to man. Cowards Another thing I don't understand; if I am such a horrible examiner, and I don't affect their bottom line, why I wonder are they trying so hard to push me out? If I was so horrible, would not the market have done this already? Moreover, I give examples as to why a polygraph company sucks, and can back it up with pure hardcore numbers and facts. 45% of the time, Woods and Associates couldn't tell is someone was telling the truth or not. This lands to one of two conclusions. 1, They are incompetent polygraph examiners and need to go back to school or be removed from the market. I mean come on, would you go to a doctor that 45% of the time couldn't tell you what was wrong? or 2, Their inconclusives were intentional because inconclusive means retest, and retest means another fee, and another fee means more money. During that period that figure added up to be over $50,000.00. Of course they said they retested everyone at no charge. Come on, who leaves 50K on the table? Maybe they are incompetent; either in business or polygraph. If Wood was telling the truth on his discovery, there is no third option. Or did he somehow lie on his discovery and it backfired? Only he knows the truth, and he is too scared of me to tell the truth. So which is it Richard, are you incompetent or are you a thief. It's not an accusation, it is a reasonable question. Because either you and your company can't tell if someone is telling the truth or a lie almost 50% of the time; or, you were double dipping tests for fees. Sorry, there is no way I believe that you did over 50K of free work; no reasonable person would. Hey, I know how to get the answer, maybe the IRS should look into it. One thing I do know, is Wood, Holden, et al got away with everything. So, who is to say I didn't go back to business as usual? Maybe the incompetence or test double dipping is still going on. I guess we will never know. While no one can deny that this happened, no one will ever release their numbers willingly or even have some sort of inside industry independent audit to make sure this kinda unethical behavior is still ongoing. people within the industry don't seem very disgusted that this was happening in Texas back in 2008 and took no measures to investigate or assure this never happened again. I say this because TAPE was aware of these numbers of Wood's as well; because they had the same attorney. So TAPE knew that Wood and Associates had an incredibly high inconclusive rate that should have raised red flags. One can only conclude that the 45% inconclusive rate was because of incompetence or an intentional act of double dipping to increase profit margin. TAPE did nothing after discovering these numbers and did nothing when I pointed out the implications of these numbers. One can only conclude that TAPE didn't care because maybe this might be common practice or because people in Wood and Associates are soooooooooo very important in the industry, it was simply overlooked. Because protection of the industry trumps protection of the polygraph consumer and the general welfare of the children of the State of Texas. Make me so proud that these are Texas' golden boys and "vigilant" protectors. Da da da daaaaaaaa! Maybe that is what all this boils down to; all these big bad Texans are scared of one Masshole yankee trying to right the wrongs of the incompetent or charlatans that want to sell the people of the State of Texas snake oil disguised at a way to protect children from child predators. Bless their hearts. LMAO
|