1st4th5thand6th wrote on Sep 27
th, 2014 at 4:53pm:
Doug, along these lines.(and in your personal opinion)..can individuals employed by the federal government,who as a condition of that employment, swear an oath of office to uphold and defend the constitution of the United States...be prosecuted for violating their oath?
I don't think that failure to uphold and defend the constitution is a crime under the United States Code. Nor should it be. It's overly vague.
Quote:Example, if Snowdenswears an oath to not divulge confidential information and does so - he's violated his oath and is considered a traitor by the United States...and can be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Snowden didn't swear an oath not to divulge confidential information. His
oath was to support and defend
the constitution, not government secrets. He did, as others with security clearances do, sign an agreement not to disclose classified information without authorization.
Quote:What happens when federal employees violate their oath???
Typically, nothing.
Quote:Specifically, what happens when federal letter agency polygraphers, their bosses, and their bosses, bosses,who take this oath and then violate it (daily) by exempting themselves from it during the course of a polygraph interview and/or violate/ignore the constitutional rights of the candidates they are "interviewing"during the interview...
..
Using the lame excuse that candidates "volunteered"
via a signed a waiver ...does not grant a waiver to any federal employee of his oath... Nor does it grant them latitude to piss all over their candidates rights....
What is the opinion of you and this board regarding this?
The courts
have not held polygraph screening to be unconstitutional. While I think that those who choose to conduct polygraph screening have made a poor ethical choice, I think they are generally well-meaning, and I wouldn't accuse them of violating their oaths to support and defend the constitution.
That said, I think that polygraph screening is fundamentally unfair and inconsistent with humanist values.