To: Bill Brown:

“There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact.” 
― Arthur Conan Doyle, The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes

William McCallsiter

ATTENTION NEW YORK AREA!!!

I am seeking information regarding a physical and/or sexual child abuse case that occured in the New York Area. The victim is possibly two (2) years of age.   Possibly in the Astoria or Bellerose (Queens County) New York area. This information was developed from a family member. Between  1993 - 2005. The suspects are:

Husband & Wfe:
Zamela Balbhadr Jambard, Age 47
Seeram Matadial, age 43
The currently reside in Orlando, Florida.

Anyone with information, please respond to:

William L. McCallister
President
Florida Polygraph Associates, Inc.
Winter Haven, FL 33880
863-299-9424
floridapolygraph@comcast.net

Interesting to see Mr. McCallister squirming like a snail in salt. However, sir, you did accept the plea bargain, therefore you must have done it, yes? I was forced into a similar situation, and accepted the lesser sentence on a false accusation. No one believes me, either, and now I must take "maintenance polygraphs" to insure the public is safe from the fiendish impulses of a degenerate sex offender. I've already seen a poly examiner lie about me capriciously on at least 2 occasions. You need to find a new occupation.

abusedbygov, 

You described your crime in an earlier post and admitted to it.  Your plea bargain was to escape incarceration and it was based on your admissions and actions.  Mr. McCallister also admitted to his previous conviction and has not hidden it from "Sandra", according to her post in support of him.  That was also a valid conviction for which he served time.  Is he guilty of the current allegations?  Only he and the ones accusing him know for sure.  We will find out when there is a trial or plea bargain, and I am willing to accept the judgment of the court or his admission at a plea bargain.  I believe things look very bad for him at this time, however, I'm not privy to all of the facts in his current case.  I cannot make a judgment based on the information I currently am aware of.   

To: Tampa Polygraph Examiner

Why don't you give your name??? You must be one of the many poorly trained and incompetent examiners operating throughout the State of Florida.  People use my service because of my knowledge, skills and experience. It is one thing to make an accusation, but another to prove it.   

There is an examiner, you know who you are, that I sued back in 1986 for being incompetent.  I suspect this comment came from you. As much as it pains me to say this...the AntiPolygraph community is understandably right about their complaints with the polygraph profession.  I have been on both sides, therefore, I have first hand knowledge.  It is easy to make a rush to judgement, so until you have all the case facts and information regarding a specific allegation or situation, it is best to be reserved. 

William McCallister

Abusedbygov, 

This was your second post on this board.  I don't know your true age and I am sure you do not know my true age.  Thanks for the compliment "what are you smoking Kid".  

Oh yes indeedy, my perspicacious friend. Only, in my case, it went a whole lot deeper. It was the owner of perverted-justice.com, NOT a cop, just a wild-eyed fanatical Jesus loving GAWD fearing jizzbone. I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, and THEY knew I knew it wasn't a 13 yr. old, yet they tracked me down and boom! That was it.

My reading of your post indicates a sexual conversation with a person posing as a 13 year old, that was a crime and you were convicted by plea bargain, which means you admitted to the allegations and charges.  You served your time and I do hope you moved on in your life and no longer speak with persons posing as 13 years olds, regardless of their true age.  

Best of luck to you in your future endeavors 

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 117 > § 2422
§ 2422. COERCION AND ENTICEMENT
(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.

abusedbygov, 

A plea is a person’s formal response to a criminal charge.  If you enter a guilty plea, it means that you admit you committed the crime with which you’ve been charged.  The judge then asks "Are you pleading guilty because in fact you are guilty?" or words to that effect.  You must answer; “Yes”, or the guilty plea is not accepted by the court and a trial is set.   

  I didn't make the laws.   There are appellate court decisions that allow conviction when any party is posing as a 13 year old and you are an adult.  Just for the record, I am considered a "Senior" by my younger associates.  

In the statute it does not address the issue of an adult posing as a child.  The appellate courts upheld convictions on cases where adults posed as young children and the individuals talking to them believed the adult was a child.  

"persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual" to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so"

I believe that is the part of the statute used in the decisions.  The Supreme Court has also upheld the appellate court decisions.  The courts have held that this is not entrapment.  There are several organizations, one mentioned by abusedbygov that goes after these cases.  

The court decisions have allowed this practice and do not find it to be entrapment.  The persons posing as underage children do not encourage the person they are talking with to violate any laws.  All conversations are saved on the computer for use in court with no omissions of wording.